His Guardians was pretty ace, though.Dan Abnett can be great but he's frequently a jobber of a writer. He'll just go out there and do the deed that editorial tells him to write.
Same as Dan Jurgens.
His Guardians was pretty ace, though.Dan Abnett can be great but he's frequently a jobber of a writer. He'll just go out there and do the deed that editorial tells him to write.
Same as Dan Jurgens.
Absolutely. The entirety of DnA-era cosmic Marvel was amazing and I loved his run on New Mutants.
That was Abnett and Lanning together though
Dan Abnett can be great but he's frequently a jobber of a writer. He'll just go out there and do the deed that editorial tells him to write.
Same as Dan Jurgens.
I agree.I admit, I love the jobbers. Abnett, Jurgens, Nicieza, Tomasi, Tieri, Giffen.
Folks that are rarely A-tier, but they keep the trains running on time. I would've put Taylor and Ewing in that spot a few years back, but they've gotten stronger.
I dunno if I'd necessarily throw Tomasi in thereI admit, I love the jobbers. Abnett, Jurgens, Nicieza, Tomasi, Tieri, Giffen.
Folks that are rarely A-tier, but they keep the trains running on time. I would've put Taylor and Ewing in that spot a few years back, but they've gotten stronger.
I wouldn't say Abnett is as bad as Waid in that regard. His Nightwing was likely a victim of DC editorial's noted disdain for the character at the time. His Aquaman run did a good job avoiding those pitfalls and I give him credit for helping build Mera up.I dunno if I'd necessarily throw Tomasi in there
The reason I dislike Abnett is because I think he writes characters poorly. He writes modern characters as though they haven't evolved, sort of like Waid. The difference is, Waid tries but has no understanding of the modern voice (look at his Champions and Avengers runs that ran along that time). When he writes older characters in the current timeframe, great! He's able to adapt his writing to their current character and the arcs they've gone through combined with the classical tone he understands.
Abnett writes characters as though they've never evolved and even worse in some cases. His Nightwing being the best example.
He does? Somehow I never noticed. Thinking back to his flash run I legitimately don't recall this trope being used much (although boy there were a lot of evil speedsters). I don't remember his FF run having this for the non-Doom arcs too. His Dr Strange run didn't have this eitherAnd he doesn't pull the same "arch-enemy is the one pulling the strings behind the scenes" trope that Waid does in nearly every fucking book.
Sam "Our Love is Real" Humphries?
yes.
Honestly part of my like for that book came from the ending of the stupid Rick Grayson stuff
Searched up the book out of curiousity and lol
Plantsexuals riot in the streets for equal rights. Humans fall in love with dogs. And crystals are more than just jewelry. A chance encounter on the job changes a riot cop's life forever as he finds himself caught in a bizarre love triangle that blurs romance, crime, and lust beyond recognition.
Bro, I still have a copy. It's super short but also the most batshit insane comic I've ever read.
I think I might try Slott's FF. I am usually pretty iffy on his writing, but I keep hearing good things.Lol Spidey always making me crack up in the Hickman FF/Fantastic Four run. He does have a big butt.
Good things? Can't say I heard much of that in my circlesI think I might try Slott's FF. I am usually pretty iffy on his writing, but I keep hearing good things.
Really? The scattered impressions I read here in this thread seemed fairly positive.
It's okay. It's like reading comic versions of an F4 cartoon that doesn't exist.I think I might try Slott's FF. I am usually pretty iffy on his writing, but I keep hearing good things.
It's okay just fineReally? The scattered impressions I read here in this thread seemed fairly positive.
I could be wrong. Like I said, I usually think Slott is a bit crap.
I get why but i never liked how Doom and Galactus just went back to their old selves especially doom in Slott FF especially after the climax of Hickman era where learned humility and was happy
But no back to classic Doom
Who
Oh yeahIt was a subplot from the Infamous Iron Man? The woman thought she was carrying Doom or Tony Starks' child.
I'm almost done with season 2 of Infinity Train. I'm not digging it as much as the first season. I mean, it's okay.
Fair enough.It's okay just fine
It makes me miss Chip Zdarsky Two in one which was a way better ff book but it's fine
I don't know how Silver Surfer is so great but his ff is so bleh
You don't need to read it
Try a few issues and decide it doesn't get better or worse besides some highlights
I like Empyre, but it reeks of those Marvel events that were clearly just meant to be a crossover arc that got blown up so they could have a sales boost. It did not warrant the amount of content it has.
Abnett wrote Nightwing like he was baby Robin or Batman 2.0. That's not out of editorial disdain, that's "I read Wolfman's Titan's and that's it." Same thing with a lot of writers, honestly, but Abnett is a lot worse. His Titans is just a genuinely unlikable book.I wouldn't say Abnett is as bad as Waid in that regard. His Nightwing was likely a victim of DC editorial's noted disdain for the character at the time. His Aquaman run did a good job avoiding those pitfalls and I give him credit for helping build Mera up.
And he doesn't pull the same "arch-enemy is the one pulling the strings behind the scenes" trope that Waid does in nearly every fucking book.
It's definitely the weakest season, but it ends really strong all the sameI'm almost done with season 2 of Infinity Train. I'm not digging it as much as the first season. I mean, it's okay.
The ending is too powerful for me to not feel for her
I mean, if you count stories from three unrelated books that were like 2 years apart each, if you consider that a storyline or buildup or something then sure, Empyre is a climax of all those in a sense
I'm annoyed about it spinning so heavily out of Excalibur as well because I also dropped it after 2 issues. But, I went back and bought up to issue 8 or 9 when they were on sale and I really liked them. It has some of the most consistently good art of any Dawn book. I'm mostly annoyed that X of Swords is interrupting all the X books which means I won't read it until the collection.Fair enough.
I think I'll leave it.
I have plenty more things to read.
Its kind of annoying that X of Swords seems to be spinning out of Excalibur heavily.
I thought it was easily the weakest of the X lineup. I dropped it after a few issues.
Now I feel I might need to catch up.
Oh I know it isn't, but it felt like it, as in the actual story doesn't seem to justify its scope.Nah. Otherwise Jason Aaron would be involved.
Also it was going to be bigger. Covid cut the tie-ins down by something like 40%.
Some of them I wouldn't call jobbers, more like past their prime, but still doing it.I admit, I love the jobbers. Abnett, Jurgens, Nicieza, Tomasi, Tieri, Giffen.
Folks that are rarely A-tier, but they keep the trains running on time. I would've put Taylor and Ewing in that spot a few years back, but they've gotten stronger.
They're like Kane in the WWE. Flirted with the main event decades ago, Now just floats around the mid card for years as an established worker good for a 6/10 match whenever ya need it.Some of them I wouldn't call jobbers, more like past their prime, but still doing it.
I think I might give Excalibur anther try.I'm annoyed about it spinning so heavily out of Excalibur as well because I also dropped it after 2 issues. But, I went back and bought up to issue 8 or 9 when they were on sale and I really liked them. It has some of the most consistently good art of any Dawn book. I'm mostly annoyed that X of Swords is interrupting all the X books which means I won't read it until the collection.
It helps how small it is but at the same time, having an actual Avengers tie in would have helped.
Empyre was definitely Cebulski's Civil War 2 in that it was "We need a big standalone event."
I'm guessing he means standalone as in not tied to any specific series that built up to it. Standalone as in it kinda comes out of nowhereIt helps how small it is but at the same time, having an actual Avengers tie in would have helped.
(And come on, no one was gonna give a fuck about Aaron's Moon Knight vs. Avengers thing.)
CW2? Standalone?
You cray cray.
They show up and do the job that's asked of them, not really pushing for their own story ideas.Some of them I wouldn't call jobbers, more like past their prime, but still doing it.
No one is passionate about Ric GraysonThey show up and do the job that's asked of them, not really pushing for their own story ideas.
Do you think Dan Jurgens is writing Ric Grayson because he's really passionate about it? It's "for hire" work in the most basic sense.