Maybe they're talking about EV/IV and other advanced stuff that you can completely ignore.
Maybe they're talking about EV/IV and other advanced stuff that you can completely ignore.
They aren't deflecting anything. The people defending this game are. If they're going out of their way to make core fans that think this looks shitty want to buy the game, defenders saying that the game "isn't for you" or is just "going for a new demo" is complete trash and utterly invalid.How is going after a new demographic (Go players, casuals, even younger kids and non-gamers) a deflection? They are using nostalgia and the same battle mechanics as the core games to keep at least some of the core fans on board which it looks like they have. But their main focus is on a new demographic, that is why they announced the 2019 game at the same time. The idea with the games is to make the Switch more appealing to non-gamers and casuals and to bring in more people to the Pokemon game series.
If you truly know a lot about Gen 1 balancing you would also know that Special Attack and Special Defense use to be all in one stat which in itself makes a difference.We know that the number of Dark and Steel types is still absurdly low, and there's a single viable Ghost type. Heck, the reason for the Alolan forms in this game is an attempt to cover the balancing issues without betraying the 151 concept.
If you go in expecting mainline Pokemon you will be disappointed, if you go in expecting a casual alternative to the series that is meant to be focused and smaller, you will have the right set of expectations because that is the intent of this game.
Gen 8 is next year, and no matter what Gen 8 would've been next year as it needs proper dev time to be a good game because obviously they are gonna put more effort into that than this smaller title.
I never stated that at all, that's your assumption. Try rereading what I said properly this time instead of using your emotions to dictate what others state.Can we please drop the "this game isn't for you" argument? It literally is a nonsensical statement, since Game Freak keeps trying to convince us we should buy this game anyway.
The world doesn't revolve around you, hence why I didn't quote you. I was talking to the dozens of people parroting that on the previous page.I never stated that at all, that's your assumption. Try rereading what I said properly this time instead of using your emotions to dictate what others state.
Can we please drop the "this game isn't for you" argument? It literally is a nonsensical statement, since Game Freak keeps trying to convince us we should buy this game anyway.
It's a very divisive game.
How do you think the core RPG players will react to the Let's Go games? I know Pokémon Go was immensely popular but it had quite a mixed reaction amongst more 'hardcore' players - how do you appease those players and is it more a case that they should wait to 2019 for the game they're after?
Masuda: So the first thing I can say is that... I've been the director on the main series Pokémon RPGs - most of them, up until now - and there are a lot of kind of core tenets or rules of the series that I've never broke up until now, for example the whole idea of the flow of going into a battle against wild Pokémon, reducing their health and then catching them. That was one of the things that we just never wanted to change but, with these games specifically, I wanted to create a new experience for kids and with this time I decided to shift that towards more of a kind of casual, lighter experience. So that's one of the things I wanted to do.
Can we please drop the "this game isn't for you" argument? It literally is a nonsensical statement, since Game Freak keeps trying to convince us we should buy this game anyway.
That doesn't change the fact that it sure as hell doesn't play like one
My conclusion is the exact opposite of yours, though. You think they're only aiming this game at one specific group. I think they're trying to have their cake and force us to eat it, too.Games are always "for everyone" because companies like money. We have the power of deduction to come to our own conclusion with what we're actually shown of the game and not phrasing that sounds like Reggie Fils-Aimé PR speak.
Maybe they're talking about EV/IV and other advanced stuff that you can completely ignore.
Less Pokemon to design, less effort involved in designing the game and less mechanics for casual fans to have to endure.
For the longest time this series has stacked on more and more complex mechanics that have made it difficult for even veterans to get too in-depth with, this game is meant to not only appeal to new fans, but people who are rather sick of how complicated the newer games have gotten and perhaps this'll make it easier for them to delve into the mainline releases again.
I don't think the game is supposed to be for me. I think they've made a product that outright goes against a lot of what I like about the series, and they're trying to go above and beyond to convince me and others to buy it.I think it makes way more sense for you to drop the "this game is supposed to be for me" basis of criticism, its literally nonsensical. The game is obviously different than usual and they said they are targeting a younger more casual audience. If that means nothing to you then you are delusional and creating unreasonable expectations for yourself. They are merely hoping that traditional fans enjoy it, which isn't that crazy, these guys made Sun and Moon, and X and Y, its not like they think traditional fans are hardcore gamers in the first place ?
They're invisible stats. You can just ignore them. Never in the main story do you have to breed for IVs or farm to EVs. So removing them makes no sense whatsoever. Same goes for natures.Well thats something I can agree with. Taking IV and EV would help get the casual to play this game. Its a rather grinding mechanic, so I could see the game going smoother without it.
My conclusion is the exact opposite of yours, though. You think they're only aiming this game at one specific group. I think they're trying to have their cake and force us to eat it, too.
Nobody is saying this.Guys game freak said this game is for regular fans so i expect it to be super hardcore and difficult LMAO
What's your point here?"And because of that we really wanted to expand on that kind of idea of what a Pokémon RPG could be, something that's broader, for everyone, and that's why we work on these games."
I will have tons of fun with this, and also hope that the 2019 games are more hardcore because of it. I was a little put off at reveal but knowing theres traditional games coming, im fine. This is a different experience.
Anyone not expecting a different experience than usual from the moment they saw the trailer is so delusional, theres really no point in trying to understand it.
The salt will make this that much more delicious.
Im excited to see what a Pokemon Lets Go meta game will look like lmao
The obvious success of this game obviously won't affect the 2019 title AT ALL.Yep, people parroting "but 2019" are going to get dunked next year lmao. It's going to be bad.
Aren't the current mainline games full of handholding already? Seems to me like people are complaining about Let's Go because it isn't targeted at them. Game Freak has stated the 2019 games will follow the more hardcore mechanics several of the fans are used to by now, if anything people should direct their concerns at that title and make sure GF knows they shouldn't water it down, instead of shitting up every Let's Go thread.You act like the 2019 game is guarenteed to be free of the bullshit that ruined this one, when there's zero proof of that.
If anything, next year's game will be even more likely to be loaded with shitty tutorials and handholding, because they'll want to cater to the people who apparently needed it in Let's Go.
My point is that they want this game to be for everyone but are ignoring things that core players wantWhat's your point here?
Have you seen a single second of footage from the core RPG?
Have you gotten a big inside scoop about the core RPG that the rest of us don't have?
If not, don't get bent out of shape about it.
Are you complaining about Let's Go, or the game they haven't shown anything of?My point is that they want this game to be for everyone but are ignoring things that core players want
Exactly. It's not even like adding the 20 or so missing evolutions would suddenly ruin the game experience. Heck, Go users have already been introduced to them.My point is that they want this game to be for everyone but are ignoring things that core players want
No, no. That is not what I'm saying at all I'm stating that this is their main focus, they still want to appeal to several groups of people, but that's just it, you can't appeal to everyone trying to appeal to everyone that doesn't work. So the slant of this game is in fact more for casuals, they are trying to appeal to several types of groups here but what fans need to understand is this isn't going to cater to only them and things they might like will be changed to appeal to a wider audience.My conclusion is the exact opposite of yours, though. You think they're only aiming this game at one specific group. I think they're trying to have their cake and force us to eat it, too.
In fact it does, that's a lot of mechanics, abilities, move types, things to catch for someone completely new to the series. Perhaps for someone who's played for over a decade it isn't a concern, but this is meant to appeal to MORE than just veterans of the series, and more than just typical gamers. I've seen many women so excited to play this with their husband or boyfriends, even my brother's wife this'll be the first Pokemon game she'll buy because of the simplicity and co-op.So why not grab from all Gens instead of giving only Gen 1 special treatment?
Grabbing from the other six gene would not make this game any more complex then it already is. What mechanics would someone have to endure if I wanted my Gardevoir?
Or even just keeping the Gen 1 evolutions? It's not like getting Rhyperior is any more complex then getting a Machamp.
Valid concern, Im also hoping they keep the little good things were seeing in this entry. I hope they can handle this nuance....probably not lolI'm more concerned about Game Freak adding the mechanics from this game into the upcoming Generation 8 entries, as X/Y & Sun/Moon already made those games passive with A LOT of handholding & linearity, along with forcing you to be friends with a bunch of candy ass nimrods that I didn't give a damn about (never mind the game constantly interrupting me about how to use a Pokémon Centre or how my emotionless avatar is not reacting to the things that are happening in-game).
That is my main concern, as I missed what Black/White & Black/White 2 had offered, both in pacing, difficulty, & post game content.
Let's Go. You said that everything isn't for everyone in regards to Let's Go, when they clearly stated they want this to be for everyone.Are you complaining about Let's Go, or the game they haven't shown anything of?
They aren't deflecting anything. The people defending this game are. If they're going out of their way to make core fans that think this looks shitty want to buy the game, defenders saying that the game "isn't for you" or is just "going for a new demo" is complete trash and utterly invalid.
Again, I wasn't talking to you. I actually quoted someone else outright in this instance.No, no. That is not what I'm saying at all I'm stating that this is their main focus, they still want to appeal to several groups of people, but that's just it, you can't appeal to everyone trying to appeal to everyone that doesn't work. So the slant of this game is in fact more for casuals, they are trying to appeal to several types of groups here but what fans need to understand is this isn't going to cater to only them and things they might like will be changed to appeal to a wider audience.
They're invisible stats. You can just ignore them. Never in the main story do you have to breed for IVs or farm to EVs. So removing them makes no sense whatsoever. Same goes for natures.