Consider this: maybe I just want a 6-8 hour game and that's it
- Thread starter Silky
- Start date
Ah, Silky being cranky as usual.
Pretty sure every publisher that isn't Sony or Ubisoft has at least something for you. Hell, hop on over to Steam with any half-decent toaster and you can find a wide breadth of indie games which range on the shorter side and also tend to be cheap. Lots of gems to sort through.
Alternatively you could maybe look for some MP games to waste time with. Play a few matches, turn it off at your leisure. Whenever I'm burned out on story or lengthy SP games I'll just play some MP for a while until I remember how much I hate playing with fellow humans.
Pretty sure every publisher that isn't Sony or Ubisoft has at least something for you. Hell, hop on over to Steam with any half-decent toaster and you can find a wide breadth of indie games which range on the shorter side and also tend to be cheap. Lots of gems to sort through.
Alternatively you could maybe look for some MP games to waste time with. Play a few matches, turn it off at your leisure. Whenever I'm burned out on story or lengthy SP games I'll just play some MP for a while until I remember how much I hate playing with fellow humans.
Admittedly, I hopped in this thread completely ready to get in OP's ass about the "virtue of short games", but then I read his actual post. He's just looking for recs, this shouldn't be an opinion thread lol.
But this take is spicy. You gotta chill. I accept people saying they don't take video games seriously, but they gotta be doing hella shit otherwise.
But this take is spicy. You gotta chill. I accept people saying they don't take video games seriously, but they gotta be doing hella shit otherwise.
I could use a shorter game right now. I'm in the midst of finishing my original playthrough Divinity Original Sin 2, which I had started a while back but put it down for Odyssey and some other stuff. I'm nearly 100 hours deep and I still have a fair amount to go. The next games on my backlog are the likes of Persona 5, Witcher 3, Dark Souls 3, Horizon, etc...so pretty daunting. Might have to pick something else before I dive into any of those.
Some games really are too long, and all for the wrong reasons. I don't mind if a game is 60+ hours, but only if you can give me enough diverse content to justify such a length. A properely paced, dense 8-hour game leaves much more of a mark on me most of the time. And what's more: I'll never replay a 60 hour game (unless you're Zelda) but I will replay a short game. As much as I love Xenoblade X and 2 (games I put a good 90-100 hours into each), they could have easily gotten rid of certain parts and made it a tighter and just plain better experience overall.
Mate. I got Breath of The Wild in December. It's the only game I play, I still havn't beaten it.
When I am done I look forward to DOOM.
When I am done I look forward to DOOM.
Could you maybe update the OP with mores specific things you look for in these short games? People generally love giving specific recommendations, but the OP turned this into a complaint thread. Like Telltale games are pretty short, but don't have much gameplay, Journey is short but may be too artsy/indie.
Episodic games are good for this. Life is Strange helped me get back into gaming after I hadn't finished a game in over two years – the bitesize chunks it came in made it far easier to digest.
So along those lines, I'd also recommend Hitman Season 1 and Tales from the Borderlands. You may need more self-control with episodic games that are already complete. Try to leave a couple months between each episode to avoid burnout (they have recaps if necessary, because this is how they were originally made to be played).
I'd also strongly recommending jumping in on the next episodic game that interests you at all on release, being part of the community discussing it can be just as fun as playing the game itself.
So along those lines, I'd also recommend Hitman Season 1 and Tales from the Borderlands. You may need more self-control with episodic games that are already complete. Try to leave a couple months between each episode to avoid burnout (they have recaps if necessary, because this is how they were originally made to be played).
I'd also strongly recommending jumping in on the next episodic game that interests you at all on release, being part of the community discussing it can be just as fun as playing the game itself.
That ain't the original op. Was just the bottom drunken rant about how he wished all games were shorter. Wasn't much to say beyond i agree, i disagree, or congrats on the opinion.
Personally, I'm fine playing long games for months or quitting games i don't feel like playing anymore. But some people feel like they have to finish everything so what ought to be entertainment turns into work and that's a shame
So...OP just spent 3hrs on the forum, and he wanted an 8hrs game?
He basically used up 1/2 of his time already for today instead of playing a random game.
He basically used up 1/2 of his time already for today instead of playing a random game.
How long to beat dot com is probably your friend OP. Or maybe you could get into speed running. They finish long ass games in minutes. Or you could mentally decide that any 6 hour playtime constitutes 1 game. So a 60 hour game is in fact 10 games. Talk about value! There are lots of short games though - probably more than there has ever been ever. Hope you find what you are looking for. I'm so balls deep inside The Witcher 3 at the moment I can't think of any recommendations that you wouldn't already know about.
The Last Day of June is a short story focused indie game that's a one-and-done. Light puzzle elements and plenty of charm.
Honestly, I despise this mindset. At least, the mindset put forward in the title, implying that games in general should be shorter or something.
I'm a busy person with a lot on my plate during my everyday life. I don't have much time for videogames.
But i'll always respect a game that offers a lot of content for my 60$. Look at God of War, it has dozens of hours of content and none of it feels rushed, poorly made or filler content.
It might take me weeks or a completely free weekend to go through it, and I welcome that immensely. Last thing I need is a 6 hour romp where I end up feeling like 'that's it?'
I'm a busy person with a lot on my plate during my everyday life. I don't have much time for videogames.
But i'll always respect a game that offers a lot of content for my 60$. Look at God of War, it has dozens of hours of content and none of it feels rushed, poorly made or filler content.
It might take me weeks or a completely free weekend to go through it, and I welcome that immensely. Last thing I need is a 6 hour romp where I end up feeling like 'that's it?'
OP, most games are 6-8 hours... they just add another 10 hours of cutscenes and 20 hours of navigating an uninteresting world on top of it. (only semi joking)
To answer more directly, the last AAA/full priced game that I finished in one sitting (minus a break here and there) was Bayonetta 2 when it originally released on the Wii U. Think it was around 8-10 hours the first time through and absolutely felt as though I got my money's worth. Perfectly paced with just enough story to break up the action without getting bogged down by it.
To answer more directly, the last AAA/full priced game that I finished in one sitting (minus a break here and there) was Bayonetta 2 when it originally released on the Wii U. Think it was around 8-10 hours the first time through and absolutely felt as though I got my money's worth. Perfectly paced with just enough story to break up the action without getting bogged down by it.
I honestly see no difference in 10 enjoyable 6 hour games and 1 enjoyable 60 hour game, except you are paying more for the 10 6 hour games.
But your choice, I don't care. Here's what you need to do.
Go to https://howlongtobeat.com/
Click search. Then click options. Put in 6 or 7 (hell or 8 if you're feeling adventurous) to the maximum game length option. Viola! Hundreds of games to pick from that are under your desired length.
But your choice, I don't care. Here's what you need to do.
Go to https://howlongtobeat.com/
Click search. Then click options. Put in 6 or 7 (hell or 8 if you're feeling adventurous) to the maximum game length option. Viola! Hundreds of games to pick from that are under your desired length.
None.
It's just his typical drive by bait/troll post. They've became kinda predictable at this point.
Some kids nowdays love insulting others for no reason. In this case it seems like some typical edgy stuff.
People love getting "value" out of their games even if that "value" is meaningless boring filler. That game that has 8 hours of content can easily be turned into 30 with a little bit of copy/pasting and people love it. It's why this gen is by far, by far the worst when it comes to AAA games.
They're like movies before they've been edited. "4 hour movies, nice!" said no one.
They're like movies before they've been edited. "4 hour movies, nice!" said no one.
You should also read / follow this thread. People there tend to play quite a lot of shorter games, even games under 1 hour in length, but it's very common for people to list out dozens of short games in a row in that thread.
Also, by in large, the entire genre of Adventure games tends to be shorter experiences, generally in the 8 or less hour range, so follow that thread too.
Also, by in large, the entire genre of Adventure games tends to be shorter experiences, generally in the 8 or less hour range, so follow that thread too.
In a perfect world. But they almost never do that. Only Hellblade comes to mind and it wasn't worth buying and was $30.
I dislike the mindset that every game has to be super long. That's why all these Zelda games got more and more stuffed with uninteresting garbage.
When I buy games I factor in replay value. That's why the Mega Man games are so great. I can beat them in a single sitting and I replay them a lot. I'm not paying more than 30 bucks for a game I only play once. That's why I resell more expensive ones to get money back.
When I buy games I factor in replay value. That's why the Mega Man games are so great. I can beat them in a single sitting and I replay them a lot. I'm not paying more than 30 bucks for a game I only play once. That's why I resell more expensive ones to get money back.
As somebody who have little time I do not understand the idea that games have to be shorter to enjoyable.
I would argue that the issue instead is that some games needs long game sessions to be enjoyable. That kind of games I cannot play anymore. I think I would love the Witcher 3 if I played it 10 years ago but I cannot see myself enjoy it today. Monster Hunter I have put a lot of hours in (80+) since it is perfectly enjoyable in short game sessions.
Generally speaking games with a lot of cut-scenes I found really hard to enjoy with my limited free time.
I would argue that the issue instead is that some games needs long game sessions to be enjoyable. That kind of games I cannot play anymore. I think I would love the Witcher 3 if I played it 10 years ago but I cannot see myself enjoy it today. Monster Hunter I have put a lot of hours in (80+) since it is perfectly enjoyable in short game sessions.
Generally speaking games with a lot of cut-scenes I found really hard to enjoy with my limited free time.
I get it, I love short games too. It is pretty hard to make a sp game that's well designed and engaging for 20 hours or more. Not every game can do what RE4 did back in the day. Here are some recommendations from the last years that should suit your need
INSIDE
Steamworld Dig 2
Momodora IV: Reverie Under the Moonlight
Uncharted: Lost Legacy
The Sexy Brutale
Undertale
Wonder Boy: The Dragon's Trap
The Beginner's Guide (only 1,5 hours)
Tales from the Borderlands
Oxenfree
INSIDE
Steamworld Dig 2
Momodora IV: Reverie Under the Moonlight
Uncharted: Lost Legacy
The Sexy Brutale
Undertale
Wonder Boy: The Dragon's Trap
The Beginner's Guide (only 1,5 hours)
Tales from the Borderlands
Oxenfree
Oh. Then yeah it's hard to even see OP's point of view. He's talking about not having time for long games but mentions a good game having replayability. That's a difference in design ethos--I ain't got time to replay shit, I'm busy hacking through a new game, fam.
Thats ok. Nobody wants a rpg like tw3 with a Game length of a First Person shooter.
I like playing Games for some weeks. They dont Need to end in 4 hours just because i have Limited Time.
OP, I 100% agree.
I'd play way more traditional videogames if we had a lot more 4-6 hour AAA titles.
As such, I've found a lot of satisfaction in VR gaming. There are enough quality titles that only demand 2 hours or so to complete. A bit on the short side, but coupled with the benefits of a quality virtual reality setup - it'll more than suffice.
I'd play way more traditional videogames if we had a lot more 4-6 hour AAA titles.
As such, I've found a lot of satisfaction in VR gaming. There are enough quality titles that only demand 2 hours or so to complete. A bit on the short side, but coupled with the benefits of a quality virtual reality setup - it'll more than suffice.
People who are busy working dont mind giving 60 dollars for a short but finished product.
One of my favourite games ever Max Payne 2 is like 4 hours long.
People in this thread equating quantity with a price point ("I'd only pay $20 for a 10 hour game!") are exactly the problem. This is why we have so many unnecessarily bloated, often open-world games with filler content.
Judged by how many copies all these Ubisoft games sell, however, it seems we're in the minority, OP. Shame really...
Edit: I realise this is all subjective. But there are enough options nowadays to quickly and without much effort to make the game longer/bigger. There's no denying this repetitive content, filling checklists and hundreds of symbols on a map. So with that in mind, I have no problems with a game being long if the content is varied and interesting but that's all very relative again.
Judged by how many copies all these Ubisoft games sell, however, it seems we're in the minority, OP. Shame really...
Edit: I realise this is all subjective. But there are enough options nowadays to quickly and without much effort to make the game longer/bigger. There's no denying this repetitive content, filling checklists and hundreds of symbols on a map. So with that in mind, I have no problems with a game being long if the content is varied and interesting but that's all very relative again.
Last edited:
Yeah no, I can get not wanting a bunch of filler, but you're not on a clock. Play it for a while, if you lose interest come back to it after you play something else.
You gotta admit that your premise will look weird to us (ridiculous even for some other) ....when many think that they are already catering to folks like you , by cutting short games from genre that should be long enough . I mean you're already called something like Horizon "too long" , when you can't exactly create an open world game that would be shorter than the standard length of assassin creed (it's usually quite short for the genre if you just focus on the main story) . The whole point of open world games is to travel through its world , even with massive handheld and guiding .
Just pick stuff like modern fps and tps campaign , some good indies few other genres ... they are often short for the comfort of people like you .
Just pick stuff like modern fps and tps campaign , some good indies few other genres ... they are often short for the comfort of people like you .
Last edited:
I'm in the same boat as the OP.
Also If any dev tries to use longer game length to sell their game to me they are doing the opposite and putting it on the ignore list. I got no time for 30+ hour games anymore. 6-12 hours is the sweet spot fot me.
Also If any dev tries to use longer game length to sell their game to me they are doing the opposite and putting it on the ignore list. I got no time for 30+ hour games anymore. 6-12 hours is the sweet spot fot me.
I never got this line of thinking, even when I'm busy I can just pop back into a game like Witcher or Horizon and play that for an hour or 2 before my next session.
I can't say that i get such mindset personally . Plenty of us got period when it's hard , even impossible to commit to regularly playing a long game . I've had period when i had to finish a megami tensei title over the course of 6 months .... Does not mean that because some games are long , that they are just full of filler content to bloat a game and would only be interesting for a short time . I don't think most people that enjoyed say the Witcher 3 felt cheated over its length , and had to face Dragon Age Inquisition/Assassin Creed level of bloated content .
I'd see nothing wrong with playing the Witcher 3 a few hours only per weeks , instead of settling for anything shorter , and convincing myself that anything longer is bloated
OP has shit to do, might be the only one with shit to do. The way you're acting you'd think developers didn't implement a save function to just play games in short bursts.
You must have lots of shit to do.
You must have lots of shit to do.
Play games for as long as you are having a good time. See, all your problems solved. It's all about having a good time, not plowing through content or "completing". Once you realize that you understand that the amount of time you spend on a game is irrelevant.
It's up to you to respect your time not the game.
It's up to you to respect your time not the game.