Abortion is one of the great evils of modern civilization. A fundamental devaluing of human life as having value or merit outside of what it contributes to society. Having an anti-abortion message is a good thing, just as having an anti-racism message is a good thing. The more films that perpetuate these messages, the better. That doesn't make Unplanned a good film, however. It doesn't absolve it of criticism for being manipulative or the veracity of its subject matter being dubious. At best, one hopes it inspires actually good films about abortion and the people who dedicate themselves to the fight against it.
To be clear I am pro abortion, and it's posdible that you overstated your position in the moment?
Ok, so, um, you have a right to this opinion but, uh, equivocation to racism is NOT a track you want to go down my friend. Let's try to steer clear of... that... and focus on the principle
'Abortion is one of the great evils of our time and contributes to the devaluation of human life outside of the context by which is contributes to society'.
The racism comparison along with no qualifiers on abortion is a yikes yikes for me, but...
As it pertains to your position and only within the context of being relevant to the subject at hand:
1) What do you mean by 'society' within the context of your statement.
2) What is your stance on the value of human life and in what way, if any, is it altered with and without the context of any types of social interactions (assuming that in your view society, as you've described it and disagree with, treads these acts are the prerequisite to attaining value).
3) In contrast to your view of a societal shift that does not promote inherent baseline value to a persons, can you describe a practical threshold (under your system of belief) by which a person will meet or fail to meet the criteria of having contributed to society. What is a 'contributive act' and in what way, in your mind, would a person or persons have to practice or pattern these types of acts, if at all, to 'have value'
4) Let's assume that you view all human life as inherently possessing value. If not, feel free to correct me.
In your view is there any group or type of persons that hold differing levels of value and if so, why (race, gender, age, situate etc) [speaking only as relevant to the issue of abortion]?
5) Under what conditions if any is abortion 'reasonable' or 'permissible', and is it ever 'an ethically neutral' act.
6) Assuming that the fetus or unborn child is granted the same rights and considerations that we would give a normative person; why does said fetus have the intrinsic right to use the mother's body without consent?
7) What is your stance on consent?
8) What is your stance on bodily autonomy?
9) Why ought society at large view abortion as a Bad.