What was worse?

  • Indiana Jones and the Crystal Skull

    Votes: 502 29.9%
  • Star Wars Rise of Skywalker

    Votes: 1,179 70.1%

  • Total voters
    1,681

kamineko

Linked the Fire
Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,673
Accardi-by-the-Sea
Skull was just ok. TRoS actually made me angry—and I never get mad about movies, that's just silly. I can't believe they ended a 9 movie saga with that
 

take_marsh

Member
Oct 27, 2017
7,361
First walking out of TROS, I would've said Crystal Skull.

A week of thinking and then seeing it a second time: TROS is a worse film. It's an extremely unsatisfying conclusion to a trilogy where the middle film is almost entirely ignored. Although I felt the performances in TROS was stronger than Crystal Skull, Crystal Skull was 100% campy and didn't actively shit on the other movies. I have no desire to watch either movie another time, mind you.
 

Mr. Poolman

The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
7,071
Crystal Skull never tried to pander to a toxic, racist, mysoginist fanbase as a response to a previous movie.
 

Hound

Member
Jul 6, 2019
1,868
Crystal Skull is better by far. It's true to the themes of the adventure serials that the series is based on, it just didn't do it particularly well, and there's some silly shit in there that feels out of place. Rise of Skywalker was a stupid, rushed, incompetent mess of a movie that did not know where it was going and is completely underwhelming as the end of a series. The only positive thing in that movie was that Palps and his clone hype-crew were kinda fun.
 

digitalrelic

Weight Loss Champion 2018: Biggest Change
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
13,124
Crystal Skull was about 3-4 removed scenes and some tweaks here and there from being a legitimately great Indy film.

The Rise of Skywalker was just complete garbage from beginning to end. Totally irredeemable.
 

Tomasoares

Member
Oct 28, 2017
4,679
Crystal Skull isn't even the worst Indiana.

....

Rise of Skywalker also isn't lmao but it is still worse than any Indiana Jones film
 

Keldroc

Member
Oct 27, 2017
12,051
TROS, and it's not even close. Crystal Skull is sub-par. Rise of Skywalker is outright inept.
 

RXM027

Member
Dec 18, 2020
1,017
ejks4ygv7w541.jpg

Hate both, but it's Rise.
 

StreetsAhead

Member
Sep 16, 2020
5,145
Crystal Skull is entirely standalone and can be disregarded, but Rise of Skywalker hitched its wagon to all the preceding films and practically sunk the franchise.
 

Praxis

Sausage Tycoon
Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,320
UK
I've seen both once and if I had a gun to my head and absolutely had to pick one I'd choose the bullet... Or Crystal Skull.

Maybe
 

Barn

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,137
Los Angeles
I could at least make thematic sense out of Crystal Skull -- I understand the progression from '40s pulp adventure to '50s sci-fi (which I actually kind of liked), and it has some cool moments and bits, despite being an overall bad movie with lots of bad parts. It's been a while, but I don't remember ever thinking that the script simply didn't function (don't at me about the fridge, it was on-par for Indiana Jones silliness, I mean the actual narrative progression of the movie).

Rise of Skywalker was just rotten to the core. In addition to sinking on the broken foundation of a completely incompetent script -- like shockingly, laughing-in-the-theater incompetent -- what puts it over the edge of badness for me is the meta surrounding the film. J.J. received the ball and he and Disney consciously decided to make a film that overtly coddled and catered to a vocal community of alt-right white male hate while entirely sidelining its bipoc cast, all in favor of making an incomprehensible, dissonant mess. It's fucking gross. That puts it over the edge for me; even compared to the prequels, it may have a much nicer sheen and better base-level performances, but at least those movies weren't quite as deliberately regressive.
 

redlentil

Member
Oct 27, 2017
415
Two of my worst movie experiences ever were swinging through the trees with the monkeys from Crystal skull, and Princess Leia flying through space in The Last Jedi. Only one of those is on this list, so Crystal Skull. I can never watch those movies again because of those scenes. I'm sure there are worse scenes in the history of cinema, but those two gave me such a strong negative response that I still can't shake them years later.
 

Siresly

Prophet of Regret
Member
Oct 27, 2017
6,637
Remember Crystal Skull as being subpar for the series in a kind of Die Hard 4 way, but still ok overall.

Rise of Skywalker had some ok parts but left me with the feeling that it primarily splurted things on the walls out of unjustified desperation, resulting in a contrived, haphazard, artificial mess by creators that stifled their creative integrity in favor of causing the foundation of the whole trilogy to crumble into a hacky random nonsense singularity where nothing felt like it mattered any longer and I was just waiting for it to end already.

Having enjoyed the first two, it bums me out that this is how the trilogy ended. Probably the worst finale of a trilogy I've seen.
 
Last edited:

Deleted member 1627

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,061
Crystal Skull was bad.

The Rise of Skywalker was offensive in that it actively fucking pandered to a part of its audience that should have been shut the fuck down and told to shut the fuck up long before the filming even started. So yeah, that movie not only sucks as a movie but on a bunch of other levels too. And this is the end of the saga? Fucks sake...
 

ElectricBlanketFire

What year is this?
Member
Oct 25, 2017
32,008
Two of my worst movie experiences ever were swinging through the trees with the monkeys from Crystal skull, and Princess Leia flying through space in The Last Jedi. Only one of those is on this list, so Crystal Skull. I can never watch those movies again because of those scenes. I'm sure there are worse scenes in the history of cinema, but those two gave me such a strong negative response that I still can't shake them years later.

As a casual fan, I thought the Leia force flying thing was cool.
 

Pulp

Member
Nov 4, 2017
3,023
I never cared to rewatch Crystal Skull. Thought it was mediocre when it came out. TROS on the other hand made angry with how damn bad it was. One of the worst blockbuster movies I have ever seen
 

DiipuSurotu

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
53,148
Chronologically I assume Indy 5 would take place before the Old Indy segments in Young Indiana Jones, so Indy 5 would probably end with Indy officially retiring from treasure hunting.
It's unclear whether the Old Indy segments are even canon anymore. When Lucasfilm re-released the series, they re-edited the stories and removed all the Old Indy segments (original series is titled "The Young Indiana Jones Chronicles", re-released version is titled "The Adventures of Young Indiana Jones").
 

HotHamBoy

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
16,423
But in saying that, it's clear you understand what I'm saying that it's cause and effect. You disagree with them doing it, you disagree with how they did it, but neither of those things are here nor there. They did it because of the second film and the reaction it received.
Obviously there is no denying that TROS is a highly-reactionary film. But who's reaction were they responding to and why? Critics loved it. Half the people who saw it loved it and a good portion more thought it was fine. The movie made bank. It was praised for its bold choices.

TROS was trying to make course corrections that it didn't need to make. If it had doubled-down on TLJ it would have at least made half the audience happy rather than none. And further more, the solutions they hit on are creatively bankrupt.

And let's examine the film on its own terms. It has problems that are completely unrelated to the previous two films in the franchise. Chewbacca is dead! But five minutes later we learn he's fine. C3PO is going to lose his memories! Oh, no wait, he's fine. That's just two glaring examples of how the film refuses to commit to any stakes.

i could go on, talk about the editing and useless plot detours, the mediocre Williams score that misuses themes, etc, but this isn't the thread
 
Oct 27, 2017
12,756
It's unclear whether the Old Indy segments are even canon anymore. When Lucasfilm re-released the series, they re-edited the stories and removed all the Old Indy segments (original series is titled "The Young Indiana Jones Chronicles", re-released version is titled "The Adventures of Young Indiana Jones").

I know, the edited version is the one I've been watching with a friend of mine the last few months.

And re: that series.... My God does it feel very un-Indy. No supernatural stuff, and the episodes with Kid Indy is basically educational programming.
 

Kernel

Member
Oct 25, 2017
20,011
Rise of Skywalker turned me off Star Wars completely.

Crystal Skull was just disappointing with some awful CG.
 

Deleted member 32005

User requested account closure
Banned
Nov 8, 2017
1,853
crystal skull could be redeemed with a few reshoots and cuts. solid script, poor direction.

RoS is a total loss imo.
 
Oct 27, 2017
12,756
As a concept I really like what they tried to do. But the execution could definitely have been better, yeah...

I like the series for what it is, but it got rather formulaic very quickly, with Indy just happening to bump into random historical people just because, like they were some kind of deus ex machina, so the writers could spin a yarn about Indy meeting <famous historical person>. IIRC Lucas is/was very fond of Tolkien and LotR, so I'm almost surprised they didn't have Indy meet Tolkien during WW1 just because.
 

Fj0823

Legendary Duelist
Member
Oct 25, 2017
26,738
Costa Rica
Crystal skull has some dumb sequences but it does not single handlely make the original three movies mean absolutely nothing nor does it negate all of Indy's achievements and then force a lamer version of said achievements to Mutt.
 

thecouncil

Banned
Oct 29, 2017
12,423
The movie tried to course correct as a result of the second film. It's a bad movie, but it's still not the worst in that trilogy. What happened was a result of course correcting. You're welcome to say someone else could have done it better, but it is cause and effect.

"Course correction" doesn't even explain half the shit that was piled onto that plot.
 

redlentil

Member
Oct 27, 2017
415
As a casual fan, I thought the Leia force flying thing was cool.

Yeah, for sure. It's a me thing. I'm sure some people were cheering at the monkey scene too.

I think TROS didn't affect me so strongly was because I had already switched off from that trilogy long before it released. My expectations were so low that even a film that bad didn't have the power to make me feel anything.
 

El Bombastico

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
36,174
"Course correction" doesn't even explain half the shit that was piled onto that plot.

It kinda does, in the sense that it feel likes Abrams went "well, fuck, my version of Episode VIII would've been COMPLETELY different than TLJ. Hmm, you know what? Fuck it. Let's just combine both my ideas for VIII or IX into one big, long-ass movie while ignoring as much of TLJ as possible. That'll be okay, and won't turn it into an incoherent mess, right?"
 

SeroTyler

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,199
Remember how TROS teased a new recording of Duel of the Fates and then there was absolutely no memorable music moment in the entire(3 hour!) conclusion of Star Wars?
 

PeskyToaster

Member
Oct 27, 2017
15,322
The Rise of Skywalker is what happens when JJ Abrams actually has to conclude his mystery boxes instead of leaving so other people have to contend with them. It's especially insulting because it's clear The Last Jedi knew that those mysteries had no real answer so it resolved them and then Rise just brings them right back. It's kind of funny if not a little sad. You can see that people get super invested in them though and they hate how they got resolved in TLJ. It's why the trick has worked so well, people never learn. It was the same shit with Lost too. People will fall for it over and over again and even hate on the dude who tells them its a trick and tries to get them to move on. Nobody wants to admit they got fooled into getting invested in who Rey's parents were when everyone who was familiar with Abrams' prior work knew it was nothing.
 

Deleted member 22750

Oct 28, 2017
13,267
crystal skull is bad

but its not unwatchable for one full watch just to see a little DR Jones
 

ArkkAngel007

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
5,060
TRoS completely undid the legacy of the family in the title, and was the rotten cherry topping of a trilogy that wanted to keep calling back to the originals while rendering the journey through them entirely meaningless. That's all on top of being a disappointing installment.

Crystal Skull was a disappointment only within its own runtime. I can watch the other Indiana Jones films without giving Crystal Skull a second thought.
 

sml_x

Member
Oct 27, 2017
248
Remember how TROS teased a new recording of Duel of the Fates and then there was absolutely no memorable music moment in the entire(3 hour!) conclusion of Star Wars?
Yeah, this too. I get it, John Williams is old, but there's like 1 new half-baked theme in RoS, surrounded by generic filler, without even that many callbacks to previous themes. This could've (and should've) been a grand finale to a 40+ year epic, had anyone involved in production given it the time and effort it deserved.
 
Oct 26, 2017
17,500
Yeah, this too. I get it, John Williams is old, but there's like 1 new half-baked theme in RoS, surrounded by generic filler, without even that many callbacks to previous themes. This could've (and should've) been a grand finale to a 40+ year epic, had anyone involved in production given it the time and effort it deserved.
I don't think there was much inspiring him to put any effort into that project. Such a forgettable OST.
 

Siggy-P

Avenger
Mar 18, 2018
11,872
Crystal skull at worst was just boring and kinda crappy.

TROS actively makes 2 other films worse to watch.
 
Oct 25, 2017
41,368
Miami, FL
Honestly I don't remember the last Indiana Jones movie to be honest. Just bits and pieces (for the best I'm sure). I remember greatly disliking it. Like I remember feeling bad because I enjoyed all the other IJ movies so much and just hated most things about this one. The swinging with the monkeys. The surviving the nuke. The aliens. Just didn't vibe with me at all. I'd have to watch it again to really know where I slot it in comparison. But I'm pretty sure Star Wars would rate worse with me. IJ didn't actively ruin characters retroactively at least.