Skull was just ok. TRoS actually made me angry—and I never get mad about movies, that's just silly. I can't believe they ended a 9 movie saga with that
Two of my worst movie experiences ever were swinging through the trees with the monkeys from Crystal skull, and Princess Leia flying through space in The Last Jedi. Only one of those is on this list, so Crystal Skull. I can never watch those movies again because of those scenes. I'm sure there are worse scenes in the history of cinema, but those two gave me such a strong negative response that I still can't shake them years later.
It's unclear whether the Old Indy segments are even canon anymore. When Lucasfilm re-released the series, they re-edited the stories and removed all the Old Indy segments (original series is titled "The Young Indiana Jones Chronicles", re-released version is titled "The Adventures of Young Indiana Jones").Chronologically I assume Indy 5 would take place before the Old Indy segments in Young Indiana Jones, so Indy 5 would probably end with Indy officially retiring from treasure hunting.
Obviously there is no denying that TROS is a highly-reactionary film. But who's reaction were they responding to and why? Critics loved it. Half the people who saw it loved it and a good portion more thought it was fine. The movie made bank. It was praised for its bold choices.But in saying that, it's clear you understand what I'm saying that it's cause and effect. You disagree with them doing it, you disagree with how they did it, but neither of those things are here nor there. They did it because of the second film and the reaction it received.
It's unclear whether the Old Indy segments are even canon anymore. When Lucasfilm re-released the series, they re-edited the stories and removed all the Old Indy segments (original series is titled "The Young Indiana Jones Chronicles", re-released version is titled "The Adventures of Young Indiana Jones").
As a casual fan, I thought the Leia force flying thing was cool.
As a concept I really like what they tried to do. But the execution could definitely have been better, yeah...And re: that series.... My God does it feel very un-Indy. No supernatural stuff, and the episodes with Kid Indy is basically educational programming.
As a concept I really like what they tried to do. But the execution could definitely have been better, yeah...
The movie tried to course correct as a result of the second film. It's a bad movie, but it's still not the worst in that trilogy. What happened was a result of course correcting. You're welcome to say someone else could have done it better, but it is cause and effect.
As a casual fan, I thought the Leia force flying thing was cool.
"Course correction" doesn't even explain half the shit that was piled onto that plot.
Yeah, this too. I get it, John Williams is old, but there's like 1 new half-baked theme in RoS, surrounded by generic filler, without even that many callbacks to previous themes. This could've (and should've) been a grand finale to a 40+ year epic, had anyone involved in production given it the time and effort it deserved.Remember how TROS teased a new recording of Duel of the Fates and then there was absolutely no memorable music moment in the entire(3 hour!) conclusion of Star Wars?
I don't think there was much inspiring him to put any effort into that project. Such a forgettable OST.Yeah, this too. I get it, John Williams is old, but there's like 1 new half-baked theme in RoS, surrounded by generic filler, without even that many callbacks to previous themes. This could've (and should've) been a grand finale to a 40+ year epic, had anyone involved in production given it the time and effort it deserved.