I mean.....it's not a great quote when you think about it!
"Hit the ground flyin'" is just crashing!
Lol touché
I mean.....it's not a great quote when you think about it!
"Hit the ground flyin'" is just crashing!
I mean.....it's not a great quote when you think about it!
"Hit the ground flyin'" is just crashing!
The email stuff should get major attention because it should allow her personal emails to be subpoenaed to find out what is in there. That's what Gowdy is being disingenuous about.
Autodidact agrees.Am I the only one that thinks anyone who refers to themself in the third person should be tarred, feathered, and then made to wear a sign that says 'I'm a moron' for eternity?
Somebody doesn't watch Jojo.Am I the only one that thinks anyone who refers to themself in the third person should be tarred, feathered, and then made to wear a sign that says 'I'm a moron' for eternity?
I quite enjoy the image used here, the last Democratic governor we may have for a while.
I quite enjoy the image used here, the last Democratic governor we may have for a while.
He's tweeting about how the narrative is mostly bs yeahHeh. Nate Silver tweeting about the theory of failing liberalism just now. Coincidence.
That's not at all what he is saying. Not sure how you can look at the global landscape and think this either.
Only the white workers seem reluctant to vote for Democrats. I wonder why.The party needs a significant tectonic shift to address the changing global landscape - it needs to rebuild its coalition with the workers fundamentally.
Racism.Only the white workers seem reluctant to vote for Democrats. I wonder why.
That's not at all what he is saying. Not sure how you can look at the global landscape and think this either.
The second sentence in thatThat second tweet.
I might be reading the wrong tweet - but I don't see that.
Racism.
The party has abandoned labor though. Quite frankly I think we're still experiencing fallout from the financial crisis that we won't fully understand for years to come.
That doesn't matter.Like 98% of the Black "Working Class" supports Democrats so when disingenuous political pundits say that the Dems need to do more to appeal to the "Working Class" they mean White racists.
The party has not abandoned labor, it has mostly just stopped prioritizing white male labor over the actual labor force. The fact that some people are interpreting that as a move away from labor is telling.
The Dems are of course far superior to the ghouls on the right. My point is this - if you look around the globe and see the rise of far right populism - the Dems need a sweeping change in economic thought. It needs to be comprehensive Wall Street reform, anti monopoly efforts, re kindle unionization, etc.That doesn't matter.
The Democrats have abandoned labor. They totally championed right-to-work laws. They refused to offer solutions and help to people affected by offshoring and free trade, except all those times they offered retraining and talked about improving infrastructure and telecommuting opportunities in those areas, talked about expanding the safety net and tackling the drug crisis, etc. But apart from that, nothing.
We're a party of neoliberal cosmopolitan corporatist centrists and all those other words that basically mean "racist white people don't like us," and we have to be better because the mark of true virtue is appealing to salt-of-the-earth factory workers who haven't voted Democratic in fifty years.
EDIT: Blast said it far more concisely.
I mean, I don't think this is true. The Democrats have had some failures on economic policy and we need to recognize that in order to grow. It doesn't mean our intersectional efforts aren't also necessary.
To add insult to injury, the carbon tax system won't even hurt the economy that much of at all. It just won't grow as fast by a negligible amount at the beggining of its implementation but actually end up accelerating it in the medium term because it's pretty much a wealth redistribution system. Consumers usually end up with more money than what they started with as they change thier behaviors to be more carbon neutral.
This little fucker.
Is he confusing "big D Democratic" liberalism with "small d democratic" liberalism? Because I'm not aware of any popular arguments suggesting society is becoming less cosmopolitan.
Do people make arguments that geographic changes against the current electoral systems might create a decline in big D Democratic liberal political power? Yeah.
Do people make arguments that we're becoming more illiberal, more anti-democratic as we destroy norms and corrode our ability to govern? Yeah.
Do people make arguments that society is leaving big cities, moving to rural areas, and becoming more conservative in their ideology? Uh, no.
The Dems are of course far superior to the ghouls on the right. My point is this - if you look around the globe and see the rise of far right populism - the Dems need a sweeping change in economic thought. It needs to be comprehensive Wall Street reform, anti monopoly efforts, re kindle unionization, etc.
Just like it looks like we're slowly ambling towards a climate future that requires major shifts in policy thought - the coalescing of capital at the top requires radical change.
Hes talking about positions of punditry, not the actual facts.Is he confusing "big D Democratic" liberalism with "small d democratic" liberalism? Because I'm not aware of any popular arguments suggesting society is becoming less cosmopolitan.
Do people make arguments that geographic changes against the current electoral systems might create a decline in big D Democratic liberal political power? Yeah.
Do people make arguments that we're becoming more illiberal, more anti-democratic as we destroy norms and corrode our ability to govern? Yeah.
Do people make arguments that society is leaving big cities, moving to rural areas, and becoming more conservative in their ideology? Uh, no.
At this very moment in 2018 - do you believe neoliberalism is succeeding in the world?Hes talking about positions of punditry, not the actual facts.
And ranting against "elites" has been super in vogue for decades upon decades.
Client scientists are in it for the money? What the what. The pretzels the right twists itself in because they don't want business to have to run environment friendly operations are astounding.
That isn't really a new argument. "Doing it for grant money" has been an argument against climate change for 25+ years.
Client scientists are in it for the money? What the what. The pretzels the right twists itself in because they don't want business to have to run environment friendly operations are astounding.
The worst part is that they believe scientists on literally everything else, its just this one thing they're lying about.
do they? all environmental issues, evolution, quantitative economics research on austerity and trickle-down econ not working, race being a social construct, sexual orientation and gender identity not being choices.....
Another of the Never Nancys says he'll vote for her on the floor if there's no other viable candidate.
So he's voting for Pelosi.
Pure theater.
RRH Elections
@RRHElections
#MSSen Poll: Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith (R) leads ex-Rep. Mike Espy (D) 54-44. rrhelections.com/index.php/2018…