• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oct 25, 2017
6,877
OH Biden +4 poll comes in: "Oh, just one poll, no way he's winning there, outlier, etc."

Morning Consult Trump COVID-19 approval +4 comes in: "I knew it, Trump always wins."

These last four years have done a number on y'all.
 

Autodidact

Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,729
In theory, if a state doesn't hold a vote on federal election day, it would just surrender any electoral votes, wouldn't it? Though I'm sure you could cook the books to make sure only absentee ballots collected by X date would end up counting or something, or pull other legal bullshit.
Federal elections can only be moved by Congress. We control the House.

If you want to get all panicky HE'LL DO IT ANYWAY, I've done some number crunching:

-Every Hillary state except MA, VT, MD, and NH has a Democratic governor; all those states have a supermajority Democratic legislature.
-North Carolina has a Democratic governor whose vetoes can't be overridden.
-We have Whitmer, Evers, and Wolf in MI, WI, and PA, respectively.

In other words, the states that would agree to it without an act of Congress have fewer than 270 electoral votes. So basically, who cares if Alabama moves its election to the 12th of never?

This scenario won't play out.
OH Biden +4 poll comes in: "Oh, just one poll, no way he's winning there, outlier, etc."

Morning consult Trump COVID-19 approval +4 comes in: "I knew it, Trump always wins."

These last four years have done a number on y'all.
You're telling me! And as I said before, people only pick the B- and C-tier pollsters to obsess over.

Have some standards.
 

Blader

Member
Oct 27, 2017
26,634
OH Biden +4 poll comes in: "Oh, just one poll, no way he's winning there, outlier, etc."

Morning Consult Trump COVID-19 approval +4 comes in: "I knew it, Trump always wins."

These last four years have done a number on y'all.
It's just the principle of the thing. It boggles the mind that anyone can approve of how he's handling the pandemic when he's at best done absolutely nothing and at worst exacerbated the problem more at every opportunity. I cannot get into the space of someone who watches his Oval Office address or his Rose Garden bullshit and thinks, yes, I approve.
 

Box of Kittens

Resettlement Advisor
Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,018
OH Biden +4 poll comes in: "Oh, just one poll, no way he's winning there, outlier, etc."

Morning Consult Trump COVID-19 approval +4 comes in: "I knew it, Trump always wins."

These last four years have done a number on y'all.
Not to mention we're still early in the outbreak and the approval situation is going to be fluid.

It's kind of like a mirror of 2016. Then people handwaved away any indication that Trump had a chance. Now the positive signs for Trump are the only things people pay attention to.
 

aspiegamer

Member
Oct 27, 2017
10,465
ZzzzzzZzzzZzz...
We can at least agree that a swing state R governor testing out mysterious new powers no one ever previously knew they had to stop an election a few hours before it starts is more than a tad concerning, right?
Federal elections can only be moved by Congress. We control the House.

If you want to get all panicky HE'LL DO IT ANYWAY, I've done some number crunching:

-Every Hillary state except MA, VT, MD, and NH has a Democratic governor; all those states have a supermajority Democratic legislature.
-North Carolina has a Democratic governor whose vetoes can't be overridden.
-We have Whitmer, Evers, and Wolf in MI, WI, and PA, respectively.
Neat. Like, no, seriously, that's actually pretty awesome.
 

AnotherNils

Member
Oct 27, 2017
11,936
Federal elections can only be moved by Congress. We control the House.

If you want to get all panicky HE'LL DO IT ANYWAY, I've done some number crunching:

-Every Hillary state except MA, VT, MD, and NH has a Democratic governor; all those states have a supermajority Democratic legislature.
-North Carolina has a Democratic governor whose vetoes can't be overridden.
-We have Whitmer, Evers, and Wolf in MI, WI, and PA, respectively.

In other words, the states that would agree to it without an act of Congress have fewer than 270 electoral votes. So basically, who cares if Alabama moves its election to the 12th of never?

This scenario won't play out.
/theydidthemath
 

Loudninja

Member
Oct 27, 2017
42,235
People dont know what the fuck is going on he created a major major clusterfuck much worse then Iowa,people still going to show up not knowing what to do

 

Arm Van Dam

self-requested ban
Banned
Mar 30, 2019
5,951
Illinois

On Hannity's show, Nunes says "media freaks don't have a clue" what's going on. Nunes claims he was encouraging people to do drive-thru or takeout during his Sunday Fox hit, despite saying people can easily get into restaurants and telling people to go to local pub.
 
Oct 26, 2017
7,978
South Carolina


tenor.gif


It's just the principle of the thing. It boggles the mind that anyone can approve of how he's handling the pandemic when he's at best done absolutely nothing and at worst exacerbated the problem more at every opportunity. I cannot get into the space of someone who watches his Oval Office address or his Rose Garden bullshit and thinks, yes, I approve.

Don't wanna be wished into the cornfield. Besides, "Identity" can change, "You" don't!
 

SpitztheGreat

Member
May 16, 2019
2,877
There are drive-thru liquor stores, but I know what you mean.
I took a dialog/speech test online one time and it tried to determine your accent based upon the phrases you used and how you pronounced certain words. One of the questions was "What is a drive-thru liquor store called?" And my answer was "There is no word for this/no such thing."
 
Oct 25, 2017
6,927
I took a dialog/speech test online one time and it tried to determine your accent based upon the phrases you used and how you pronounced certain words. One of the questions was "What is a drive-thru liquor store called?" And my answer was "There is no word for this/no such thing."
Next you're going to tell me you don't know what a bubbler is!

(I remember that quiz. lol)
 

adam387

Member
Nov 27, 2017
5,215
God, this Ohio thing is the dumbest shit ever. Dewine is a fucking moron.

So, from what I can piece together: Since the judge decided he couldn't move the election like he wanted to, he simply had the state health's director order the polls not be open. However, that in no way cancels or moves the election. So, technically, the election is still on even if the polls aren't open. Then, at some point, they're going to go to the courts and demand that everyone who wants to vote, but hasn't, gets to.....somehow. Then you have GOP State Reps who are fucking livid because ... this is clearly not Constitutional:



And there are down ballot stuff everywhere tomorrow, including levies and shit. Absolutely ridiculous.
 

Loudninja

Member
Oct 27, 2017
42,235
So, Ohio SoS issued a directive to all the board of elections:

I guess they're using the Medical Director to get around the judge's order (which is actually fine because the judge just didn't want to do it on his own, he had no qualms with them using their authority to do so) and basically moving it to June.

God. What a stupid mess.
People still going to show up do to the very poor timing of all of this .
 

CreepingFear

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
16,766
Think of the goodwill that Bernie could do by dropping out for the health of the country. Which is why we will see Bernie stay in all the way until the convention.
 

adam387

Member
Nov 27, 2017
5,215
People still going to show up do to the very poor timing of all of this .
That's what annoys me the most. Like, in the directive the SoS issued, they're actually going to let people request absentee ballots between now and the end of May. They're not making it harder, in all honesty, to vote. I don't see malice as much as fucking incompetence.

If they wanted to do this, and I am sympathetic to them doing it, they had days to do this. Dewine has been on the TV six ways to Sunday. They could have announced this Friday, Saturday or Sunday. Doing it late in the day on Monday is absurd.
 

Loudninja

Member
Oct 27, 2017
42,235
That's what annoys me the most. Like, in the directive the SoS issued, they're actually going to let people request absentee ballots between now and the end of May. They're not making it harder, in all honesty, to vote. I don't see malice as much as fucking incompetence.

If they wanted to do this, and I am sympathetic to them doing it, they had days to do this. Dewine has been on the TV six ways to Sunday. They could have announced this Friday, Saturday or Sunday. Doing it late in the day on Monday is absurd.
Yeah very hard for me to trust a republican at all here.
 

adam387

Member
Nov 27, 2017
5,215
Yeah very hard for me to trust a republican at all here.
Eh. I mean, fucking with our primary doesn't help him at all. And, honestly, Dewine has been really good the last few weeks handling COVID. I think his rationale makes total sense here...it's the implementation that's horrible. We also cannot get enough poll workers because older folks have no desire to be out right now, and I don't blame them. There are also down ballot things that affect both Dems and GOP. I just think it's poor strategy more than malfeasance.
 

patientzero

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,729
Eh. I mean, fucking with our primary doesn't help him at all. And, honestly, Dewine has been really good the last few weeks handling COVID. I think his rationale makes total sense here...it's the implementation that's horrible. We also cannot get enough poll workers because older folks have no desire to be out right now, and I don't blame them. There are also down ballot things that affect both Dems and GOP. I just think it's poor strategy more than malfeasance.

It's this. Incompetence over malice.

I've said it already and I'll say it again. DeWine is, as a Republican, an asshole. But he's been doing damned good until today.

This situation strikes me as something where the intentions are actually in good faith, but they waited too long to act and are now trying like hell to will the situation into being and it's sending terribly mixed messages. Still, I'll be at my polling situation as soon as "work" ends tomorrow.
 

Loudninja

Member
Oct 27, 2017
42,235
Eh. I mean, fucking with our primary doesn't help him at all. And, honestly, Dewine has been really good the last few weeks handling COVID. I think his rationale makes total sense here...it's the implementation that's horrible. We also cannot get enough poll workers because older folks have no desire to be out right now, and I don't blame them. There are also down ballot things that affect both Dems and GOP. I just think it's poor strategy more than malfeasance.
Yeah I also dont want anyone to go out and vote at all right now as well. The fact is he had plenty of time to do this right he did not he did it in the worse way possible thats going to cause him and many people major issues
 

Scottt

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,218
On one hand it sounds absurd to bail out a generally superfluous industry like casinos, but on the other hand it would support vulnerable Native American economies. I don't know what to think.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.