I do wish Stahl had come back with hard facts instead of basically just saying "yes you did" at his denials. I guess you don't really go to 60 Minutes for hard hitting.
He can if not enough of us show up to vote (see 2016). Thankfully I don't think that mistake is being made this year, but I do worry about fraudulent shit going down invalidating mail in/early votes, which is why we need to make it a landslide and not remotely disputable where one state with close numbers would swing the whole thing (ala Florida 2000)
They both seem pretty bad in this.
He's throwing a tantrum and giving non-answers meanwhile she's hardly challenging him with facts
This is the one thing in american journalism I dont get.I do wish Stahl had come back with hard facts instead of basically just saying "yes you did" at his denials. I guess you don't really go to 60 Minutes for hard hitting.
I'm losing my mind. Have you ever tried reasoning with a toddler throwing a tantrum? All the facts in the world wouldn't have changed this interview.
Lesley Stahl, legendary jouranlist, bad at interviews. I've heard it all today.
You cannot get a narcissist to admit things unless it is convenient for them at the moment. PERIOD. You can show all the evidence in the world and recall things they said verbatim and they will always say they were joking or you misinterpreted or come up with some other outlandish, outrageous excuse.They both seem pretty bad in this.
He's throwing a tantrum and giving non-answers meanwhile she's hardly challenging him with facts
This is the one thing in american journalism I dont get.
Is it so hard t prepare a rebuttal for things they know with pretty much 100% certainty he is going to say? They bitch and moan, but when they have an opportunity to actually show their work, they do this. Is it because they dont want to be banned from interviews...? I dont get it.
They both seem pretty bad in this.
He's throwing a tantrum and giving non-answers meanwhile she's hardly challenging him with facts
You cannot get a narcissist to admit things unless it is convenient for them at the moment. PERIOD.
Yeah it's not even a question they'll be doing exactly this... it's par for the course with 60 Minutes interviews to do cutaways to the contextualizing facts isn't it?We haven't seen the 60 Minutes edit of this yet. They could easily cut to footage of him saying these things in the program.
Is it?
Ok well you clearly, for some reason, don't think Trump comes across as an outrageous childish buffoon in this interview.Then don't hold the interview. There's really no point if it's going to be the same result as the majority of interviews with him. Prep yourself beforehand because the dude spews the same 3 lines of bullshit- have your facts in order to rebuttal against the lies.
Seriously. His clever distractions and changing of focus never ever work. He undermines his new narrative immediately, or just gives people something as horribe (or worse) to go at him with. His base has been solidified for a long time, and none of this helps or hurts him with them. All he does is keep Biden's polling lead historically steady, and hamper his own ability to pin any bullshit on Biden.
Ok well you clearly, for some reason, don't think Trump comes across as an outrageous childish buffoon in this interview.
Stahl literally pushed trump so hard that he quit the interview, I don't know how some of you are expecting her to go harder.
I honestly thought this was a joke.. But.. I can't.. Lol
I do wish Stahl had come back with hard facts instead of basically just saying "yes you did" at his denials. I guess you don't really go to 60 Minutes for hard hitting.
Yeah it's not even a question they'll be doing exactly this... it's par for the courses with 60 Minutes interviews to do cutaways to the contextualizing facts isn't it?
Fuck that. You think trump saying somehting shitty absolves this shitty response from leslie? So your telling me focus on how terrible trump is and ignore shitty reporting? Fuck that. I don't have to both sides obvious shit.Jesus christ dude, this is not the hill you wanna die on. Fucking think about your Trump-defending "b-but both sides bad!" rhetoric before you post here.
Let's be real, he'll just go again with 'fake news' and 'how nasty of you'
Yep. She was bad at containing him and holding his feet to the fire.
Exactly. How hard was it for her to say, " Obama care IS what started covering pre-existing condition" , how bout she mention how millions of people weren't covered before obama care and now they are. The point isn't to try and convince this turd, but to not let me unopposedly go unaswered. Like he goes on and on and on about hunter biden and you dont even mention he was IMPEACHED even once because of that? EVEN FREAKING ONCE!I do wish Stahl had come back with hard facts instead of basically just saying "yes you did" at his denials. I guess you don't really go to 60 Minutes for hard hitting.
I'm guessing she decided/was told not to bother with live fact-checking because they would just insert the clips/tweets in the actual show.Despite what some are saying I liked that she didn't "fact check" him outside of "yes you did," because we know it's true, and it's not on us to prove his eight billion lies are lies (they are). It's a waste of time to do the work fact checking idiots like this, of course they're lying, and by the time you dig up the clip they've already moved on to something else that's totally insane. You can't have an intelligent conversation with this guy, he is incapable of it.
The proof is going to be in the actual edit of the episode. They're going to cut to the proof multiple times. That's 60 Minutes shtick.For sure. She knows what questions she's going to ask, she should be prepared for his rebuttals with proof.
"Nice dodge" lol insanely unnecessary. I wasn't dodging, but that irritated me, so now I'll bite. My point is, is that she's interviewed him before; she knows what she's doing. He's going to lie regardless. I think she clearly did a good job considering the fact that he's been whining about it ever since, and has been trying to discredit her, and walked out of the interview early. She royally pissed him off. The best interviewer was the Australian guy IMO but she clearly did her job and got him very heated.
The insincerity is radiating off you, and your attempts to both sides this interview is transparent. Stahl did her job, stop armchair quarterbacking how to interview when you clearly are out of your element. Interviewers can't stop the interview in its tracks to show PowerPoint slides or video files proving Trump is lying, nor is it their job to go "gotcha" like they're in a live feed Era thread.
Not to mention, how exactly would that accomplish anything? Trump is a denial machine. He isn't suddenly to admit wrongdoing just because they show him footage of him saying stuff. He'd say it was fake news or a joke. And the interviewer accomplishes nothing except wasting time.
Hallie Jackson has a habit of doing that when the GOP WH officials try to push the talking points instead of answering the question.Most of the time I find any comments about a reporter "owning" an interviewee to be exaggerated but she really did hand him his ass there.
The insincerity is radiating off you, and your attempts to both sides this interview is transparent. Stahl did her job, stop armchair quarterbacking how to interview when you clearly are out of your element. Interviewers can't stop the interview in its tracks to show PowerPoint slides or video files proving Trump is lying, nor is it their job to go "gotcha" like they're in a live feed Era thread.
Not to mention, how exactly would that accomplish anything? Trump is a denial machine. He isn't suddenly to admit wrongdoing just because they show him footage of him saying stuff. He'd say it was fake news or a joke. And the interviewer accomplishes nothing except wasting time.
Do your mental health a favor and skip this. It's nothing new or substantial and is everything you expect it to be.