Sure, but muh taxes aint paying for poor people to have free things you filthy communist!
More money for me is great, but not it if it means more money for the poors (there's actually a study on this, and that's very much how a lot of right wingers think).But surly it means that "poor" people have more money to spend, thus boosting the economy and meaning more money in your pocket........right?
Yeah, who needs Vegas when the stock market is like this? Hoping to find the next AMD.
Is there any chance we actually get this thing? It would be so helpful.
More money for me is great, but not it if it means more money for the poors (there's actually a study on this, and that's very much how a lot of right wingers think).
I believe it was because they wanted to feel like they're doing better than others.Because they want the poor to remain poor? I never understood this line of thinking. Why would you want to see people in poverty?
I expect prices to increase on everything. $100 bananas incoming.
I'll believe it's happening the moment i see that check in the mail. This is coming from a compulsive liar after all.wow so america is the first capitalistic country to have a basic income in form of helicopter money and the republicans are doing it. how about that.
It will all go to bills/debt
lol jk, if the sources are right, I make too much income to get a stimulus. Sucks on me for *just* making that cutoff.
Just curious what are the sources saying?
If I do get it, I will use it to pay my 2019 tax bill.
What the threshold would be is still under consideration, but likely individuals would need to make below $100,000. It's possible the benefit could be capped for anyone making more than $75,000.