Won't someone think of the whites, straights and males?He passively shit on whites, straights and males all in one sentence.
Won't someone think of the whites, straights and males?He passively shit on whites, straights and males all in one sentence.
Not that I'm necessarily a gamer label defender, but I've reported the comment.hey gamer label defenders, maybe call out this dog whistle? just a thought.
Dog whistle? Please... this is a joke at this point. Any line of thinking outside of you own is racist now? The guy clearly came in and equated gamer with the scum of the earth.hey gamer label defenders, maybe call out this dog whistle? just a thought.
i'm really not interested in your concern with status quoDog whistle? Please... this is a joke at this point. Any line of thinking outside of you own is racist now? The guy clearly came in and equated gamer with scum of the scum of the earth.
sorry, that wasn't meant to be mutually exclusive. I just find it strange that the ones who are so up in arms about the gamer label being mixed with toxicity are ones I never see call this garbage out.Not that I'm necessarily a gamer label defender, but I've reported the comment.
And I'm not interested in witch hunts.
What were we supposed to call out exactly?sorry, that wasn't meant to be mutually exclusive. I just find it strange that the ones who are so up in arms about the gamer label being mixed with toxicity are ones I never see call this garbage out.
hey gamer label defenders, maybe call out this dog whistle? just a thought.
I agree with all of this, if you are into golf and your a "golfer". It doesnt imply that you belong in a cult with everyone that plays golf. It simply states your hobby.I think there's a disconnect in the two sides here.
- The "gamer" group isn't saying it's part of their or your identity, they are saying it's just a descriptor for a hobby.
- The "not a gamer" side reactions are so strong that it's as if not being one is part of their identity.
Personally I don't understand the vehemence of the reaction to this word - it's like there's been an in-group re-definition of the term so that it has become jargon for something else. I suppose the questions for me are:-
Why does it have to be an active aspect of your identity to be one or NOT be one?
Why aren't we just using the general consensus definition of "gamer"?
I would class myself as a games enthusiast since I own a high end PC, but I haven't had a slight interest to play the following mega popular games.
Why does it have to be an active aspect of your identity to be one or NOT be one?
Why aren't we just using the general consensus definition of "gamer"?
Probably because they love playing, reading, and talking about games more than any other hobby.Here's a question, why would a minority who gets harassed endlessly by those who put them self under the 'gamer' identity want to be recognized as a gamer them self?
Yeah.I agree with all of this, if you are into golf and your a "golfer". It doesnt imply that you belong in a cult with everyone that plays golf. It simply states your hobby.
GamerGate are sexist/racist assholes. But people here generally aren't those things (at least not publicly) and I think most people who know about resetera would describe it as a forum for gamers.There's been an unfortunate association of gamers with GamerGate, as if playing games makes you a sexist and racist asshole.
Yeah, you don't get it.
And no, it wouldn't. Only times I've been actually treated well were the times I'd say I was a guy, and would avoid voice chat like the plague. So no I have my reasons to not want to call myself "a gamer" lmao.
GamerGate are sexist/racist assholes. But people here generally aren't those things (at least not publicly) and I think most people who know about resetera would describe it as a forum for gamers.
I think the culture point is a good one. While the argument around the dictionary definition of 'gamer=someone who plays games' is one thing, the culture and discourse that surrounds games in 2018, and the way some gamers act within those, is often the more troublesome element that a strict definition revolving around 'play' doesn't quite cover. If 'gamer' only meant 'plays games' I'd probably use it with less care than it's current connection to and adoption by entire hate groups of internet shitlords (and some streamers/youtubers etc) willing to start, support or defend harassment campaigns over the mildest thing.I don't identify myself as such often but if someone says I am I don't dispute it, I do play games. I'm a gamer in that I am an enthusiast player of games, but I hate gamer culture, and I don't just mean the racist sexist bigots, but the socially awkward, poorly dressed man baby stuff as well.
Yep. There's really nothing more to it.I agree with all of this, if you are into golf and your a "golfer". It doesnt imply that you belong in a cult with everyone that plays golf. It simply states your hobby.
Well, viewer - so yes. But a more appropriate analogy to game -> gamer (as opposed to player) would be:
tv -> tver (as opposed to viewer)
book -> booker (as opposed to reader)
music -> musicer (as opposed to listener)
Toxicity aside, it's never made english sense. It's basically a neologism, and it just honestly makes you sound like you're 10 years old.
Hell no! When I hear "gamer" I think of the annoying crowd at Xbox conferences. I like video games and have no problem to admit it, but I would never use the term "gamer" to describe myself.