Mouse click to move and RMB+LMB vs virtual joystick?
If it's the same thing but with touch controls, but with more people in the party, how does that make it simplified? Are touch controls more simple than mouse controls?
No one wants to spend $1000 on an Iphone X to play this at a good framerate when we have PC's & Consoles at home, that's my problem, no one cared about Hearthstone being a mobile game years ago. Bethesda is putting Blades on everything, they made the smart move.We're in 2018 and people on a gaming forum are still treating mobile games as if we're in 2008. C'mon people. It's a valid platform for millions and millions of players of all demographics and levels of dedication to the hobby. Is mobile still not the largest and most profitable gaming market?
There will come a day within most of our lifetimes where dedicated hardware will go the way of the dodo anyway, and most games will be streamed/ cast from our favoured devices onto their screens or others. I'd rather be part of the movement than an angry old man clinging to his dedicated "hardcore" box.
What's simplified about it? I see 5 abilities and two potions you can use. A magic bar and a life bar. Per-ability cooldown timers. How is that simplified over Diablo III? How is touching something simplified over mouse-clicking something?
It's an MMORPG. You don't have time for an MMORPG.I will probably get hated for this opinion but I'm excited about this. Nowadays I don't have time to play a loot grind game and something like Diablo on my phone is perfect. I feel the gameplay in this series is simple enough it may work. Something like Monster Hunter or Destiny would be much harder to do on phones.
As a person who doesn't usually play games on phones this could very well be my first ever mobile game I play seriously.
We're in 2018 and people on a gaming forum are still treating mobile games as if we're in 2008. C'mon people. It's a valid platform for millions and millions of players of all demographics and levels of dedication to the hobby. Is mobile still not the largest and most profitable gaming market?
I'm confused, did you think I was implying touch controls were better?Mouse click to move and RMB+LMB vs virtual joystick?
Uh, yes they are. Stuff like dashing is less precise because you cannot control the distance with a virtual joystick, and that's just basic movement. Precise casting is also way inferior, button binding, etc.
We've seen this before a hundred times in this genre.
No one wants to spend $1000 on an Iphone X to play this at a good framerate when we have PC's & Consoles at home, that's my problem, no one cared about Hearthstone being a mobile game years ago. Bethesda is putting Blades on everything, they made the smart move.
I did, I meant to quote the other guy. I apologize.I'm confused, did you think I was implying touch controls were better?
Not sure what's the point. Whenever they do announce D4, they are all gonna come back anyway.Wonder if reaction to this is going to force their hand into an earlier than planned announcement of Diablo 4. Similar to how MP4 was probably announced early after the reaction to Federation Force.
We're in 2018 and people on a gaming forum are still treating mobile games as if we're in 2008. C'mon people. It's a valid platform for millions and millions of players of all demographics and levels of dedication to the hobby. Is mobile still not the largest and most profitable gaming market?
There will come a day within most of our lifetimes where dedicated hardware will go the way of the dodo anyway, and most games will be streamed/ cast from our favoured devices onto their screens or others. I'd rather be part of the movement than an angry old man clinging to his dedicated "hardcore" box.
I'm confused, did you think I was implying touch controls were better?
At worst they may implement d-pad-like controls, but they've already done that with the console versions of Diablo III, and people love those ports.
Ah okay, it's been one of those days and if I misread something it wouldn't be the first time. No worries.
The trailer seemed to have framerate drops & it was likely running on good hardware, the visuals look on par to D3 as well, which means older phones/tablets are no doubt gonna struggle with this. I might be wrong though, but still, i would prefer to play this at 60fps on my PC or even Switch.It's Netease and their games have absurdly low spec requirements. They will want it to run on as many devices as possible so why would they lock it to such a high spec and cost?
They won't, Diablo is dead to Blizzard. They sold the IP to NetEase games who will tarnish it and then destroy it. It's all over. Diablo is doomed.
Not sure what's the point. Whenever they do announce D4, they are all gonna come back anyway.
They question I responded to saying 'yes' asked if touchscreen controls were more simple than the mouse.you quoted a person saying "yes" to someone asking if kb/m was better than touch and said "not for a game like this no"
i was confused by it as well
Not trolling. I know D3 was hated at launch, but they really went a long way to fix most of the issues, it's now a great game. And the console ports got high reviews.ah, so you're definitely trolling
i'll just give you a reminder - people werent okay with the casualization of skills in D3. at all
The trailer seemed to have framerate drops & it was likely running on good hardware, the visuals look on par to D3 as well, which means older phones/tablets are no doubt gonna struggle with this. I might be wrong though, but still, i would prefer to play this at 60fps on my PC or even Switch.