Goddamn what a season of television. My absolute favorite show of 2022, top 10 shows of all time maybe, in the conversation for top 3 Star Wars and a good second/final season would easily cement it as #1
View: https://twitter.com/asgd1998/status/1590293055206481924
Final post credits shot is insane, it took the Empire 4 more years to go from this to fully armed and operational battle station
There's a good chance the series does a lot of bridge-building toward Rogue One from here. It'll be fascinating to see the trail of breadcrumbs that leads the Alliance to discover the Death Star. So I didn't so much see it as a wink-type reference as a tease for the trajectory of Season 2.The post credits scene was really stupid and unnecessary, the kind of "wink wink, nudge nudge" the show had smartly mostly avoided. The prisoners being cogs in the Imperial war machine was all we needed to know about what they were doing there.
Okay can you explain how it's awful?
It's a 10 second clip that connects back to the Prison Arc, shows something that has sorely needed to be shown for a long time now (pretty much all TV/Movie media has just said the Empire built the Death Star but not really how, showing it utilized slave labor is a meaningful display of fascist rhetoric and functionality), and y'know, connects back to the series finale of this show, Rogue One.
I'm not show it's awful other than "oh my god I hate stuff connected to Star Wars" and for some reason you didn't mind the droids, the stormtroopers, the kyber crystal, the TIE fighters....
I don't think it's meant to be "a little fan service thing." Andor is positioned as the direct foundation to Rogue One, which is meant to underline the effort and sacrifices the rebels made to effect the very first major Rebel victory against the Empire: the destruction of the Death Star.
It's appropriate to show it here because it's the ultimate symbol of one of the show's theme, the tightening grip of an oppressor that fears its dissidents.
Sure. I loved the Prison stuff and I thought it was very obvious that they were building stuff for the Death Star. I didn't need to be spoon fed that at the end. So that's the main issue.
The Death Star itself isn't really relevant to the Andor story at this point, (which is why it was in the post credits) so it was just a really annoying piece of fan service that took away from the excellent ending scene before the credits.
Cassian building something that will lead to his death is pretty damn poetic though. The fact that it's the laser itself speak volume to the severity of Death Star, before Abrams ruins it with Starkiller.The post credits scene was unnecessary and kind of stupid, the kind of "wink wink, nudge nudge" nonsense the show had smartly mostly avoided. The prisoners being cogs in the Imperial war machine was all we needed to know about what they were doing there, let alone tying it directly to the Death Star. It's not a big deal, but it was a misstep.
Anyway, I really enjoyed the show and am looking forward to season 2.
Cassian building something that will lead to his death is pretty damn poetic though. The fact that it's the laser itself speak volume to the severity of Death Star, before Abrams ruins it with Starkiller.
I keep telling people some SWs fans have PTSD.
A 10 second post credits shot of the Death Star when the when the entire show is about how Andor ends up in the place where he gives his life to find out about it and help destroy it should not be any sort of controversial but here we are...
It's not fan service. Cassian is literally killed by the Death Star. Like, the scene marks the trajectory of his story, and also the story of the whole rebellian that culminates in the destruction of the Death Star.Sure. I loved the Prison stuff and I thought it was very obvious that they were building stuff for the Death Star. I didn't need to be spoon fed that at the end. So that's the main issue.
The Death Star itself isn't really relevant to the Andor story at this point, (which is why it was in the post credits) so it was just a really annoying piece of fan service that took away from the excellent ending scene before the credits.
It's cool that you think so, but there were still people theorizing on it and when it comes to displaying fascism it's good to show aggressively and not just let people fill in the blanks or hope they figured it out. It's good to let people know the fascist empire used slave labor to build their weapons of mass destruction.
It literally is a cheap wink wink nudge nudge because your reading of the scene only works if you've seen Rogue One and know the story. Which obviously most people watching the show do.It's not fan service. Cassian is literally killed by the Death Star. Like, the scene marks the trajectory of his story, and also the story of the whole rebellian that culminates in the destruction of the Death Star.
It's not there for cheap wink wink nudge nudge.
Yes. Later in the episode a couple of ISB agents are discussing that conversation and suggesting that gambling debts could explain the oddities in their banking. So it worked, as far as we know at this time.So speculation, did Mon throw her husband under the bus? Were there actually gambling debts or was it brainfood for the driver? I'm leaning to Mon set up her husband to be a plausible reason for her banking.
Well duh, it's the direct prequel to Rogue One. It's natural for a work of fiction to communicate with and be informed by the works that came before it. It being set in the past doesn't mean that it must pretend that connecting works don't exist.Obviosuly there are dumb people who need this stuff spoon fed to them, but up to this point Andor hans't been that kind of show which is why that scene is a bit shit.
It literally is a cheap wink wink nudge nudge because your reading of the scene only works if you've seen Rogue One and know the story. Which obviously most people watching the show do.
You began the series with Cassian asking about his sister, and then Maarva later tried to discourage him from looking any further. So will that thread be pulled on again at some point?
That's TBD. I don't want to get out in front of that question.
The post-credit scene confirms that Narkina 5 was actually building components for the Death Star. Will the Death Star's construction have a more active presence in season two, or will it remain as the looming threat in the background?
It'll still be the looming threat. Rogue One is all about discovering what it is. [Season two is] about who picks up the final breadcrumbs that lead to the beginning of Rogue One. In Rogue One, Cassian goes to the Ring of Kafrene to meet Tivik, who is from Saw's group, and he says, "Oh my God, it's a planet killer." Cassian knows some shit, but he's looking for answers. So we'll [cover] the breadcrumbs that lead up to that, sure. But we have a situation where Cassian will never know that what he was building is actually the machine that's going to kill him.
You didn't bring any of season one's directors back despite stellar work on their part. Did you want more of that new energy that worked so well the first go-round? [Writer's Note: Ariel Kleiman, Janus Metz and Alonso Ruizpalacios will be directing on season two.]
Man, we tried really hard. Ben [Caron] didn't want to come back because he had his movie [Sharper] with Julianne Moore. He's a big feature director now, so he wants to see how his feature goes. We also wanted Toby [Haynes] to come back really badly, but he got jammed up on Black Mirror. So he couldn't give us a decision in time, and we had to pull the trigger.
Yes. Later in the episode a couple of ISB agents are discussing that conversation and suggesting that gambling debts could explain the oddities in their banking. So it worked, as far as we know at this time.
Too bad she didn't think of it before meeting with that creep who wants her daughter to marry his son.
The DNA of the show is that it's a Star Wars show. Should they not show Storm Troopers as well because it's too on the mark? Or the Senate Chambers from the prequel trilogy? Or the numerous other SW references because...this is the Star Wars universe? I'm surprised more people didn't complain about Canto Bright being referenced in regards to gambling (unless people did earlier in this thread)I can see why some people dislike the post credits because having the show explicitly show you something in totally CG sequence is kind of outside the DNA of the rest of the show. There was probably a more subtle way to present the same information that was less in your face. For me, it was in the post credits so eh, not a big deal.
What was artificial about that? The entire lead up was that everyone was looking for Cassian and everyone figured he'd be there for his mother's funeral. This wasn't some chance convergence. Everyone came there at the same time intentionallyThat being said, it still felt a tiny bit artificial with almost all the major characters converging on Ferrix
I don't disagree with anything you've said here. But none of this means that a shitty fan service scene was required post-credits. But we still got one and it detracted from the epsiode a little.Well duh, it's the direct prequel to Rogue One. It's natural for a work of fiction to communicate with and be informed by the works that came before it. It being set in the past doesn't mean that it must pretend that connecting works don't exist.
) I wish hammer clock man had used one of his hammers to yeet the Imp off the tower
😂😂😂
By DNA I mean how the show is shot. The show has an incredibly grounded feel because it uses a lot of practical effects, props and on site shooting. We also spend almost all our time seeing the world through the eyes of the characters rather than wide establishing shots of CG environments. Having a sequence that is exclusively CG just doesn't feel like it's coming from the same show. Again, it's not a big deal at all for me, I just think the same information could have been more subtlety executed.The DNA of the show is that it's a Star Wars show. Should they not show Storm Troopers as well because it's too on the mark? Or the Senate Chambers from the prequel trilogy? Or the numerous other SW references because...this is the Star Wars universe? I'm surprised more people didn't complain about Canto Bright being referenced in regards to gambling (unless people did earlier in this thread)
The DNA of the show is that it's a Star Wars show. Should they not show Storm Troopers as well because it's too on the mark? Or the Senate Chambers from the prequel trilogy? Or the numerous other SW references because...this is the Star Wars universe? I'm surprised more people didn't complain about Canto Bright being referenced in regards to gambling (unless people did earlier in this thread)
What was artificial about that? The entire lead up was that everyone was looking for Cassian and everyone figured he'd be there for his mother's funeral. This wasn't some chance convergence. Everyone came there at the same time intentionally
My point is that it's not a fan service. Your argument that it's wink wink nudge nudge because my "reading of the scene only works if you've seen Rogue One and know the story" is weird to me because this show directly connects to that movie.I don't disagree with anything you've said here. But none of this means that a shitty fan service scene was required post-credits. But we still got one and it detracted from the epsiode a little.
Last episode we literally had a scene were multiple tie fighters and an Imperial ship's tractor beam were taken out by Luthen before he jumped away. I don't see how this was any less grounded than that. It is still a Star Wars show and despite being grounded it'll always connect back to the larger, less grounded, moviesBy DNA I mean how the show is shot. The show has an incredibly grounded feel because it uses a lot of practical effects, props and on site shooting. We also spend almost all our time seeing the world through the eyes of the characters rather than wide establishing shots of CG environments. Having a sequence that is exclusively CG just doesn't feel like it's coming from the same show. Again, it's not a big deal at all for me, I just think the same information could have been more subtlety executed.
Let's imagine another world where this scene wasn't in the episode. Would there be anyone here saying "Why didn't the Death Star show up?". No. So it's not essential to the story of season 1 of Andor. It's a knowing nod to where the story is going. Or as most would call it: Fan service.My point is that it's not a fan service. Your argument that it's wink wink nudge nudge because my "reading of the scene only works if you've seen Rogue One and know the story" it's weird to me because this show directly connects to that movie. It's a follow up story to that movie, featuring a lot of the major players of the movie, continuing the theme of a rebellion under oppression. And that movie is explicitly about the Death Star as the ultimate symbol of oppression. Why wouldn't it appear here?
We saw that sequence through Luthen and the bridge crew of the star destroyer's eyes. Go and rewatch that sequence, we never go more than two shots in a row of CG ships in space before we're back in the cockpit or bridge with the characters. That is what I mean by grounded, because these fantastical things are always framed from the point of view of the characters within them which helps make them feel more real, rather than just a CG thing. That's what I feel was missing from the Death Star stringer.Last episode we literally had a scene were multiple tie fighters and an Imperial ship's tractor beam were taken out by Luthen before he jumped away. I don't see how this was any less grounded than that. It is still a Star Wars show and despite being grounded it'll always connect back to the larger, less grounded, movies
We saw that sequence through Luthen and the bridge crew of the star destroyer's eyes. Go and rewatch that sequence, we never go more than two shots in a row of CG ships in space before we're back in the cockpit or bridge with the characters. That is what I mean by grounded, because these fantastical things are always framed from the point of view of the characters within them which helps make them feel more real, rather than just a CG thing. That's what I feel was missing from the Death Star stringer.
Mon Mothma (Genevieve O'Reilly) fabricated a story that her husband's gambling is responsible for the missing money in her account.
You're the first person who's brought that up. I love that. Thank you.
Why does she still go through with the Sculdun (Richard Dillane) family arrangement if she already planted that gambling-related cover story?
She's just trying to cover all the tracks. Sculdun originally came in and said, "Oh, I know your husband." So, in the end, Sculdun probably thinks that this is really about her husband's gambling debts. He doesn't know what the real purposes are. But what I'm saying there is that she's just covering all the bases. If anybody comes looking, if anybody's wondering why she might be borrowing money or if Sculdun is wondering why she might be borrowing money, she can lay it off on poor Peerin [Alastair Mackenzie].
If money was no object, would you have shown the Kreegyr ambush?
Well, in the grammar of our show, I probably wouldn't. Our grammar is pretty rigorous. Without establishing Kreegyr as a speaking character, as someone that we've been with or some other peripheral character who's there or something, I probably wouldn't. We don't ever go anywhere where one of our characters isn't walking us into it, [Death Star] Easter egg aside and a few extreme cases like that. Even with our camera, our grammar is very rigorous about what we allow ourselves to do in the perspective we are allowed to have. So, probably not. I would take that Kreegyr money that you're giving me and put it somewhere else.
I mean sure we disagree, but I feel like you're really misrepresenting what I'm saying. It's not about the amount of CG at all. This quote that Joeytj just posted shows Gilroy himself agreeing with what I'm saying:At this point it's "Oh this scene had slightly less than this completely arbitrary amount of CG so it's okay...let's just agree to disagree. I personally see so meaningful difference between the two
If money was no object, would you have shown the Kreegyr ambush?
Well, in the grammar of our show, I probably wouldn't. Our grammar is pretty rigorous. Without establishing Kreegyr as a speaking character, as someone that we've been with or some other peripheral character who's there or something, I probably wouldn't. We don't ever go anywhere where one of our characters isn't walking us into it, [Death Star] Easter egg aside and a few extreme cases like that. Even with our camera, our grammar is very rigorous about what we allow ourselves to do in the perspective we are allowed to have. So, probably not. I would take that Kreegyr money that you're giving me and put it somewhere else.
What exactly is the reason the crowd riots in this one? Just years of resentment that has built up over the Imperial presence? I can understand that but it seems like it's just written that there should be a riot in there to just make it easier for Cassian to rescue Bix amid all the chaos. All of those people there for a funeral start rioting and then getting arrested and shot for... what? A temporary fuck you to the Imperials? I don't think that's enough of a motivation. So many people got hurt and killed over a riot that had no end goal or anything. People need a reason to rise up, and while resentment over the Imperial yoke is fair enough, it didn't seem like there was any reason to risk their otherwise mostly peaceful lives even with Maarva talking about the unfairness of it all and urging them to do so. They had no goal at all and it just ended in a large number of them getting killed for no reason at all.
I don't consider the post credits scene to be fan service whatsoever. It's a glimpse at, a reminder of, the blade hanging over Andor's neck. "Don't forget, this is the end game." It's the final mission he has no idea he's going to sign up for, and it's his inexorable doom.
They tipped over the cute droid. That's a riot on sight in most of the galaxy.What exactly is the reason the crowd riots in this one? Just years of resentment that has built up over the Imperial presence? I can understand that but it seems like it's just written that there should be a riot in there to just make it easier for Cassian to rescue Bix amid all the chaos. All of those people there for a funeral start rioting and then getting arrested and shot for... what? A temporary fuck you to the Imperials? I don't think that's enough of a motivation. So many people got hurt and killed over a riot that had no end goal or anything. People need a reason to rise up, and while resentment over the Imperial yoke is fair enough, it didn't seem like there was any reason to risk their otherwise mostly peaceful lives even with Maarva talking about the unfairness of it all and urging them to do so. They had no goal at all and it just ended in a large number of them getting killed for no reason at all.
Other than that, another great episode and I'm looking forward to more in the series. Who knew television shows would end up being Star Wars' saving grace and the films (mostly) reviled? The Mandalorian, Boba Fett, Obi-Wan and now Andor aren't perfect but they're entertaining me far more than any of the post-Lucas film releases. Long may the quality releases last.
Too bad, you're staying up for another 2 hours to finish this out.
NOT using the wilhelm scream for the trooper off the tower, bravo👍 Thank you Andor team.