I came in expecting full UpsetEra. Glad common sense prevailed.This OP is one of the most ERA things I have ever read.
You should be ashamed.
Wow. Did you just insult me?!!
Nah, the biggest thread backlash was that one where a guy's take was so nuclear that the subsequent backlash caused him to request an account deletion as so many industry people came in to tell him about off the mark he was.
Yes! For no plausible reason.
Yeah, still not seeing how its insulting.Instead of iwata imagine the name is your friend or a family member.
That's a pretty bad one, too. With this one we're up to 9 pages, eclipsing the game's OT, and OP has basically ran off and hid in a corner since the first page.
This was hard to read
? I still don't understand how showing a grave is insulting. Are grave sites not typically where you put dead people? Have they not for things of years been made into literal tributes to those people, with monuments, statues, quotes, and years lived etc inscribed on them? What could possibly be insulting by showing that...?People really don't understand how it's insulting? Typically touching tributes to people you respect don't include showing their fucking graves. Do you think Iwata's family would be okay with this?
I feel like even if they patch this out the damage is already done.
Because it only shows Iwata's importance by showing that he's dead. That's the thing that game thinks is important to immortalize as. There's no touching quote or reference to his accomplishments, just his gravestone and his death date. As depicted the thing that the video game thinks is important about Iwata is that he's dead. Graves are not inherently respectful or sacred. In Final Fantasy I there's a gravestone for Erdrick which was clearly meant to be read as a dig at a competing franchise. Just because you put a dead person there doesn't mean that gravestones are inherently respectful.? I still don't understand how showing a grave is insulting. Are grave sites not typically where you put dead people? Have they not for things of years been made into literal tributes to those people, with monuments, statues, quotes, and years lived etc inscribed on them? What could possibly be insulting by showing that...?
Because it only shows Iwata's importance by showing that he's dead. That's the thing that game thinks is important to immortalize as. There's no touching quote or reference to his accomplishments, just his gravestone and his death date. As depicted the thing that the video game thinks is important about Iwata is that he's dead. Graves are not inherently respectful or sacred. In Final Fantasy I there's a gravestone for Erdrick which was clearly meant to be read as a dig at a competing franchise. Just because you put a dead person there doesn't mean that gravestones are inherently respectful.
Also, when you reference real life deaths in a video game, you always get the family's blessing before you do so. Do we think that the developers got Iwata's family blessing for this? Somehow I doubt that.