Look at his post history and it'll become clear
Well effing said Maneil.Her claiming native blood at the level she is at downplays people of substantial native blood who face a real uphill fight vs some rich white woman.
Exactly, and actual American Indians have said as much in light of this shit, and yet we still have people defending her over it.Her claiming native blood at the level she is at downplays people of substantial native blood who face a real uphill fight vs some rich white woman.
Be honest and speak from your heart, don't be performative.i'm twisting myself in knots trying to decide exactly how woke I need to be in this thread so that no one attacks me
Lol. Absolutely.Warren deserves everything she gets for nuking herself like an idiot
I think it was a mistake. I never said it was right. I think she honestly didn't know what she was doing was wrong. She won't be talking about Native American ancestry from here on out. She never lied about anything though. Or claimed she had more blood than she did. And that 1/1024th number is highly misleading. We can't really say how much blood she has. That's why she shouldn't have even taken the test. It's pretty meaningless in deciding native ancestry.you're pretending that warren wasn't wrong in what she did. she used an ethnicity other than her own for a personal advantage, and then claimed victory when it was revealed that it basically wasn't true. if you're going to argue that being maybe 1/1024th native american validates her claims, then you're being disingenuous and/or hypocritical, period. there is not an argument here. she was wrong. i would still vote for her, but she was absolutely wrong, and you know it.
If shitting on someone is enough for stupid people to give you an election, there'd be a lot less poc in office. There was a lot more factors in play in the 2016 election than just "who gives the best zingers". Like farmers/ miners thinking they could vote for trump cause he'd help them. It's not that simple. Just because trump got lucky and won once does not mean that we now have to have only dumbass candidates whose only advantage is that a certain base finds them charismatic.did you miss 2016? the public are absolutely stupid! if talk of policy were to outrank everything else Hillary would have won! what are you even talking about? good lord. also everyone was mocking Trump when he announced his run, everyone was mocking Trump when he was in the primary, everyone was mocking Trump when he was in the general. guess what? he won
so yeah I honestly have no idea what you're even trying to get across right now
Ow the edge. So, all gamers that laughed st this are misogynist and racists? Good to know that chuckling at a post makes me all that.
TruthBecause he's leaking sexism and misogyny out of every pore.
And also the most effective people aligned against him are women.
I hate Trump, but this is hilarious. Some of y'all need to calm down.
You can't really do that without also implicating Bill Clinton though. Not saying that it shouldn't happen regardless of course, but it's not an attack that is gonna split evenly down party lines, especially when you're only running on "probably".
Yes, so little native blood that Native Americand have spoken out against her claim, finding it offensive.
Isn't their opinion the topic the most important?
Trump is a scumbag and having a memeing president is horrific. But we also need to be honest in what the Warren situation is.
Which has nothing to do with if there is an actual gaffe to play off of or not. If there isn't any, they'll lie and make it truth. The worry about this DNA crap, specifically is a pure nothingburger, and reeks of paranoia - or worse, mal intent.I don't worry that Trump has ammo, I worry that the American people will go for the funny TV man over the smart but not cool, and not very savvy at messaging, technocrat. Warren is a better technocrat than Hillary, and has better speaking skills and more sincerity, but you can't fight catch phrases with spreadsheets.
If shitting on someone is enough for stupid people to give you an election, there'd be a lot less poc in office. There was a lot more factors in play in the 2016 election than just "who gives the best zingers". Like farmers/ miners thinking they could vote for trump cause he'd help them. It's not that simple. Just because trump got lucky and won once does not mean that we now have to have only dumbass candidates whose only advantage is that a certain base finds them charismatic.
Not sure if this is a joke or legit tinfoil hat posting...I wonder how much Koch is paying these Trumpers in here to fake hating Trump in most threads but giggling at this one joke in a conniving attempt to gaslight us into normalizing Trump.
I wonder how much Koch is paying these Trumpers in here to fake hating Trump in most threads but giggling at this one joke in a conniving attempt to gaslight us into normalizing Trump.
Yeah, it's not like he came up with it himself. He probably didn't even get it at first.I hate Trump, but this is hilarious. Some of y'all need to calm down.
you'll have to forgive me for not underestimating Trump. if and when he loses then we can talk about luck. until then he should be treated as far more of a threat than you're giving him credit for.
It was a not-thinly veiled attack on the perceived dogma of Era from the perspective of an outsider, hence the "hm".
This is politics that decides the leader of a country. "Just ignore it and it'll go away" does not work here, nor should it. And how are you ignoring Trump, the one who calls out and tries to get into twitter beef with anyone that criticizes him. If what you say is true, every politician has ammo on trump and does that stop him from humiliating us ona national level? It doesn't. Not to mention you're giving a dna test that was technically true, way too much importance, you're acting as if Warren should crawl under a rock for the rest of her life cause someone said she doesn't have enough NA blood in her. If anything Trump is the one who's unfit to be a politician considering his thin skin and pride.The criticism isn't that she has a small amount of NA DNA
The criticism is she let the stupid attack get to her to a point where she self sabotaged and gave everyone ammo for something she should have never done in the first place.
Which means in the one instance she actually went toe to toe with Trump, she failed horribly and in a rather humiliating fashion.
It shoes me she is horribly unreliable to deal with the shit Trump will throw at the GE candidate. Doing the thing he wants you to do is literally the exact opposite thing you should do.
Don't the Kochs openly hate Trump?I think they've gone too far but there's some truth in that you'd only find this joke funny if you buy into the Koch funded take of Warren.
With that said I only take issue with people saying this is why Warren shouldn't run.
This is wild
Warren right now:
She's going to be the Jeb! of the 2020 primaries unfortunately.
I wonder how much Koch is paying these Trumpers in here to fake hating Trump in most threads but giggling at this one joke in a conniving attempt to gaslight us into normalizing Trump.
This is politics that decides the leader of a country. "Just ignore it and it'll go away" does not work here, nor should it. And how are you ignoring Trump, the one who calls out and tries to get into twitter beef with anyone that criticizes him. If what you say is true, every politician has ammo on trump and does that stop him from humiliating us ona national level? It doesn't. Not to mention you're giving a dna test that was technically true, way too much importance, you're acting as if Warren should crawl under a rock for the rest of her life cause someone said she doesn't have enough NA blood in her. If anything Trump is the one who's unfit to be a politician considering his glass skin and pride.
People are allowed opinions. This isn't a hivemind. Just because some of us, including myself laughed at the tweet doesn't mean we all turned into Nazi Trump lovers.
Thank you for being objective. It's good to be morally consistent.It's actually valid criticism unlike the racist "Pocahontas" nickname. Trying to identify as Native American when you have a very loose connection is a really bad look. I like Warren and detest everything about Trump, but this is appropriate
If this was a year and a half ago I doubt as many people would be chuckling.People are allowed opinions. This isn't a hivemind. Just because some of us, including myself laughed at the tweet doesn't mean we all turned into Nazi Trump lovers.
It was a not-thinly veiled attack on the perceived dogma of Era from the perspective of an outsider, hence the "hm".