Agreed. Way off on the Kentucky choice. Honestly most of the cities in the state are perfectly fine, especially compared to the worst of other states.
Yep, the problem here is some of rural areas.
and Lexington is clearly better than Louisville lol
Agreed. Way off on the Kentucky choice. Honestly most of the cities in the state are perfectly fine, especially compared to the worst of other states.
Oh yeah as a place to do shit yeah it is a nothing place. Especially when Athens and Atlanta are literally up the streetI mean sure, there are definitely smaller towns that are objectively worse. However, if the larger cities in GA, what does Macon have to offer?
Augusta has the riverfront and the golf course, Athens has UGA and the music scene there, Columbus is pretty boring (I think it's got some manufacturing close to there? Idk lol, it's pretty damn quiet over there but I digress)
Savannah is self explanatory as is Atlanta duh.
What does Macon offer? It feels like a more depressing version of Orlando with none of the theme parks and sprawl for miles and miles. Ive never had a good time there, ever lol
Macon is easily the worst city worth mentioning in GA and I stand by that.
Orlando is correct. But there's Pine Hills.
Well I guess every part of Orange County is Orlando
I can't abide by this Albany slander when Troy is mere miles away.
Nah. Phoenix and Tempe are pretty awesome. Don't know about the rest of the suburbs not mentioned, except Scottsdale doesn't like non-white people so that would be high on the list.You could extend Mesa to the greater Phoenix area and still be right.
Really though it's probably Yuma or something similar.
Hartford at least has decent adjacent towns like West Hartford, Avon, and Farmington. Won't lie, Hartford is an absolute dumpster fire, and I make sure to get out of city limits asap when visiting my parents. Posted from Avon CT.I knew it would be Bridgeport when I saw the thread title. I personally think Hartford is worse.
Checks Texas... eh, sure.
Checks Minnesota... Edina??? WTF. That's objectively one of the nicest areas of the Twin Cities Metro. Very upscale and usually wins "best of" awards for livability and all that noise. There are hundreds of other awful, downtrodden, drug ridden, depressing hellholes all throughout rural MN that would make more sense.
Pueblo's a solid pick for Colorado. Wouldn't argue against Fort Morgan or Grand Junction, though, both of which I've heard mentioned as the worst cities in CO.
Nah dawg, Springfield.
Some of these are just bizarre. Dallas is the worst city in Texas? Orlando is the worst city in Florida? Cedar Rapids can't be a bad place considering how many podunk places in Iowa exist.
Mesa is boring as fuck, sure, but it's better than that shithole South of us.
Mesa is such a weird fucking pick. Like, there's literally nothing noteworthy about it whatsoever, positive or negative. It's a city of 500,000 people that can literally be described as "it exists". I can only guess there were too few data points for AZ and it got in by random choice.
Those would also be fair. Or Montrose.Pueblo's a solid pick for Colorado. Wouldn't argue against Fort Morgan or Grand Junction, though, both of which I've heard mentioned as the worst cities in CO.
Plus how can you say Mesa is bad when the entire west side of the Phoenix metro area exists.
I knew it would be Bridgeport when I saw the thread title. I personally think Hartford is worse.
Came here to basically say this. I would've gone with Payette, Pocatello, Mountain Home, or Weiser before even considering Caldwell personally. Coeur d'Alene is a white supremacist nightmare, but at last it's pretty up there?Caldwell? Really?
Lived there for about a decade. It's not great, but it's ... fine. But not the worst. For that, you have Nampa or Emmett. Or, like, Coeur d'Alene and environs (huge white supremacist contingency)
on the plus side... someone noticed Caldwell.
🤷‍♂️