Yeah stop replying to someone who has a legitimate question. Fuck me for not being as smart as you, ass.
Also, did respond with very helpful replies.
The dog pile isn't your fault but you should know that the gaslighting trolls do on purpose uses the exact same phrasing and method - a sort of "so what" rhetorical moving of the goalposts.
So the folks dog piling on you are doing so because you unintentionally used a very common rhetorical device employed by trolls. It's unfortunate but that's where we're at these days.
As you say not everyone follows this stuff or understands the law or geopolitics but to answer your original question :
It's bad because he starts by connecting arms sales to a favor he's going to ask - in plain English, then connects already approved funding to the favor - then asks for the leader of an ally and shared enemy of Russia to investigate a political rival not only based on hearsay and total fiction -including Trump's own invented accusations - but on internal Ukraine matters that have already been investigated and found to have no merit. Further he tasks his own PERSONAL lawyer - a man with no official government position and a naked crook - to help Ukraine either find or invent dirt on a political rival AND look into a server that may contain evidence of Trump's crimes per the Mueller investigation.
The quid pro quo is almost directly stated even in this sterilized and redacted summary - again not even a full transcript. AND he's having his justice department illegally suppress the whistleblower report AND shared it with non authorized persons in massive violations of law and national security.
It's
seismic. And the president and Giuliani already admitted it verbally.
