I love these recent Resident Evil remakes and I honestly wouldn't mind seeing more of them. Personally I would be open to any and all games they want to remake. However, I understand that sentiment is probably pretty split on this topic.
Some people think it would be stupid to remake 1 again, and that it still holds up extremely well.
Some people think 4 shouldn't be touched because it still holds up and a remake could only ruin parts of what's special about it.
Some people think 5&6 shouldn't get remakes because they're the black sheep of the franchise and couldn't be salvaged even if they were remade.
Some people think 0 & Code Veronica are too inconsequential/mediocre to waste the time and resources to remake them.
So where is your personal line? Which REmakes should and shouldn't be made and why? When would Capcom cross the line from doing awesome restorations/reinventions into lazy cash-grab territory for you?
Some people think it would be stupid to remake 1 again, and that it still holds up extremely well.
Some people think 4 shouldn't be touched because it still holds up and a remake could only ruin parts of what's special about it.
Some people think 5&6 shouldn't get remakes because they're the black sheep of the franchise and couldn't be salvaged even if they were remade.
Some people think 0 & Code Veronica are too inconsequential/mediocre to waste the time and resources to remake them.
So where is your personal line? Which REmakes should and shouldn't be made and why? When would Capcom cross the line from doing awesome restorations/reinventions into lazy cash-grab territory for you?