Apparently the algorithm for false flag reporting is really easy to abuse to silence people. Like if a person denied Greg's appeal, the only reason I can think of is that they felt someone is rightfully offended for being called a hoe?
I once reported someone for randomly saying something hateful and racist in a reply to one of my tweets. They deliberately went to search for tweets about Japan and decided to reply to me. I reported the tweet for being racist, twitter support did nothing. Their entire twitter account was full of hateful racist and sexist tweets in Korean. It was only when my friends and I reported every single harmful tweet that they did something months later.
Edit: I'm not really sure about the validity of Ty being the one handling Nick's trust funds.
The problem really is that just blindly reporting things is the only way to get legitimately bad things banned too, and even that's a mess.
To begin with the reason you're picking is pretty arbitrary - what counts as directing hate against a "protected category" vs targeted harassment if the harassment is due to bigotry, and which is treated more seriously? Does my report just get tossed if they decide I didn't pick right (and is that consistent or up to the person reviewing, if there even is a person)? And then they ask you to pick up to 5 offending tweets in a screen (that is often pretty glitchy depending on how you're looking at it) that's just straight up their timeline with no easy to look for any bad stuff or jump further back fast. So often you have the real bad tweet at the top and then just end up scrolling through a ton of completely fucking ordinary tweets with the occasional bit of something hateful, trying to find some more recent things that vaaaaaguely fit being bad in a way that makes it look the real issue merits attention. Which means you're just always hoping
something there sticks out enough that they do anything. And this, of course, means anyone who's just trying to cause trouble can go through the exact same process and have about the same degree of access even if it's actually acceptable.
And then, yeah, they just randomly send you a "hey, we did something to this account" some time later. With 0 explanation of what they were reported for (despite that being a thing you can seemingly indicate you'd be fine with seeing in these messages?) or when it happened. Really assuming anything you report would be so rare as to be memorable, I guess...