Why is all the blandest shit in the top two tiers?
The voters were British.
That's literally the reason. They're not profitable areas so the private providers don't bother upgrading it. Nationalising it is the first steps to start reaching those areas.But neither of those are the reason. If you just fixed everything by nationalising it then it's great. But the problems in rural Devon for example aren't fixed just cos it's state owned. The cost is still enormous. And not budgeted for I hasten to add.
He is and we won't get him.Now imagine a Tory tweeting this.
Jeremy Corbyn is too good for England.
Not looking likely, if the UK rejects him now he'll almost surely stand down and the country will have had its chance for a different path for the next 10~20 years.
My heart bleeds
You can always tell them this cunt is lying (apart from just knowing word his says is complete bullshit) chase he has a subtle smirk. I'm surprised no one in the media has called him out for it.
In other news a fucking idiotic woman on BBC news at 10 said she doesn't think the scruffy twat is trustworthy but she thinks he's a good person. I wanted to punch my TV. We are fucked.
This is such a weird post. Nationalisation is step 1 on a very long path.
It's like, if you bought a car to fix it up, it isn't fixed up the moment you take ownership. What are you even thinking?
A lot.of money has been given to openreach and they haven't done much with it. They can't be trusted to do it.It's like buying a fixer upper for £1000 knowing it needs £5000 of work to be roadworthy but insisting that you can do it all for your initial £1000 that is now sitting in the garage's bank account.
The idea that public ownership sorts the issues out is madness. The issue is cost. If Labour had set aside the money to do a full rollout then that would be different. But they haven't. Not by a long shot. So there is a better chance of achieving the rollout through government targets, investment and regulation. And a government scheme to make it free for the most hard up.
It's like buying a fixer upper for £1000 knowing it needs £5000 of work to be roadworthy but insisting that you can do it all for your initial £1000 that is now sitting in the garage's bank account.
The idea that public ownership sorts the issues out is madness. The issue is cost. If Labour had set aside the money to do a full rollout then that would be different. But they haven't. Not by a long shot. So there is a better chance of achieving the rollout through government targets, investment and regulation. And a government scheme to make it free for the most hard up.
Hey guys, just a quickie. Where did the Tories find extra cash for what they're promising without raising taxes?
Where i work most people are on zero hour contracts and minimum wage, yet they all hate Corbyn, it truly is sad what the media has done to this country.
Hey guys, just a quickie. Where did the Tories find extra cash for what they're promising without raising taxes?
Where i work most people are on zero hour contracts and minimum wage, yet they all hate Corbyn, it truly is sad what the media has done to this country.
They didn't. Either their promises are bullshit (like 50000 new nurses or 40 new hospitals), or they're going to just inflate the debt even more. It's all nonsense.Hey guys, just a quickie. Where did the Tories find extra cash for what they're promising without raising taxes?
Where i work most people are on zero hour contracts and minimum wage, yet they all hate Corbyn, it truly is sad what the media has done to this country.
Not looking likely, if the UK rejects him now he'll almost surely stand down and the country will have had its chance for a different path for the next 10~20 years.
Anybody that talks like that is basically covering up for the real reason but don't want to be heard saying what they really think. I've noticed that shift more post Brexit vote. It's that or they are clueless, brainwashed but I think it's mostly hate.
So based on this, you are telling me that a lot of private companies are operating on a "small to nil" profit margin because they care about our health? Or why would any private entity operate under those conditions?
At this point I am really not sure if you have an understanding of what is happening with the NHS.
Also: all your Corbyn stuff is... baseless. You have not provide a backing to your views, nada.
hopefully today we might see the tory manifesto start to crumble
- central policy is a lie
- lying about having a social care policy for months then missing one out
- contempt of suggesting so little for 5 years
might depend on the willingness of the bbc to point out lies though
Dude if they have a plan to do it, why are you shitting on it? Do you work in government?
Tory manifesto is so safe and boring.
The only people I can see it appealing to is little Englanders who are perfectly happy with their lot, and live in a bubble.
So the largest portion of the result deciding electorate then?
Also the Tories are incredibly dangerous - the worst incarnation of the Tories I can remember. But the point is that if you think their manifesto is "safe and boring" they've done their job. Because that's the exact thing they go for. "We're a safe but dull pair of hands". Before they rip out the welfare state and privatise the rest of the NHS.
I think it's becoming clear the narrative is more that is woefully inadequate and outright misleading, not to mention mostly bereft of substance and detail.So the largest portion of the result deciding electorate then?
Also the Tories are incredibly dangerous - the worst incarnation of the Tories I can remember. But the point is that if you think their manifesto is "safe and boring" they've done their job. Because that's the exact thing they go for. "We're a safe but dull pair of hands". Before they rip out the welfare state and privatise the rest of the NHS.
I know about the costs and issues with replacing the copper fibre network (and no I don't work for BT). Labour are saying there is £15BN to spend. It won't touch the sides and most of that will go in the nationalisation. Along with thousands of jobs. What will they do with the thousands of people they make unemployed?
Then they will need a huge, huge amount more to sort the fast fibre everywhere promise. Like orders of magnitude more.
They pledged 20.3BN, not including the cost of nationalisation.I know about the costs and issues with replacing the copper fibre network (and no I don't work for BT). Labour are saying there is £15BN to spend. It won't touch the sides and most of that will go in the nationalisation. Along with thousands of jobs. What will they do with the thousands of people they make unemployed?
There is a one-off capital cost to roll-out the full-fibre network of £15.3 billion (in addition to the Government's existing and not-yet-spent £5 billion commitment), which will be paid for from our Green Transformation Fund;
The cost of bringing parts of BT into public ownership be set by Parliament and paid for by swapping bonds for shares, as occurs with other public ownership processes;
Yep. And that doesn't include the mountain of lawsuits the Government would be facing if it actually lowballs BT investors.
There's a reason why fibre hasn't been laid out everywhere. IMO, 5G is a lot more cost-effective for remote locations.
Network providers like plusnet or talk talk basically just pay BT to use their infrastructure and then lump their own cost on top of that to make a profit.I know about the costs and issues with replacing the copper fibre network (and no I don't work for BT). Labour are saying there is £15BN to spend. It won't touch the sides and most of that will go in the nationalisation. Along with thousands of jobs. What will they do with the thousands of people they make unemployed?
Then they will need a huge, huge amount more to sort the fast fibre everywhere promise. Like orders of magnitude more.
They pledged 20.3BN, not including the cost of nationalisation.
edit: also, won't the national broadband require employees to run it?
How did you calculate this figure?
Network providers like plusnet or talk talk basically just pay BT to use their infrastructure and then lump their own cost on top of that to make a profit.
If the infrastructure is owned by the government, then plusnet and talk talk will just be paying the government instead.
If it ends up working like that then I assume labour's mission will be to provide a baseline of minimum internet availability to everyone while the providers will be able to charge more for a faster service.