Been saying this would be the case for a while now, and it's unfolding pretty much how I've expected. The pandemic showed many workers that much (if not most) of their work can be done perfectly fine remotely and they're not going back. The genie's out of the bottle at this point. I know I've completely written off companies that aren't flexible while job seeking.
View: https://twitter.com/TIME/status/1681404086548086808?s=20
View: https://twitter.com/TIME/status/1681404086548086808?s=20
The beginning of 2023 brought the end of some remote-work policies as Disney, Starbucks, and Activision Blizzard all said they would require employees to come into the office more frequently.
Employees complained, and there was some anecdotal evidence that in-office mandates were costing those and other companies good workers, who voted with their feet and went elsewhere.
Now, the proof is getting stronger that a lack of flexibility can hurt in the long term. Companies with flexible work policies are growing more quickly than those that require people to be in the office full-time, according to The Flex Index, released July 18, which collects office requirements on more than 4,500 companies with 30,000 locations and that employ more than 100 million people globally.
Specifically, in the last year, companies—regardless of their size—that are fully flexible added jobs at more than twice the rate of companies that were full-time in office.
"It seems pretty clear that the companies that are full time in-office are having a harder time attracting talent than the companies that offer some level of flexibility," says Rob Sadow, CEO and co-founder of Scoop, the technology company that publishes the report.
Even companies that offer some level of flexibility, whether it be two or three days working from home, have grown more quickly than those that require full-time in-office. Among companies that have between 500 and 5,000 employees, for example, structured hybrid companies (i.e., that require employees to come in on some specific days, but not on others) grew headcount 4.6% over the year, while fully flexible companies of that size grew 4.5%. Full-time in-office companies of that size grew only 2.1%, by comparison.
But there's a limit to what kind of hybrid arrangement employees seem willing to commit to. Companies that require 1-3 days in the office grew much faster than those that required four or five, the report found.
"Once you start getting closer to full-time in office, requiring four or five days, I think there's a bright line starting to emerge for employees and for your ability to attract talent," Sadow says.
Full article: https://time.com/6294640/remote-work-winning/Of course, headcount growth is not necessarily a proxy for a company's financial health. But in this economy, with an extremely low unemployment rate and some industries still reporting wars over talent, the companies that are hiring are typically the ones growing revenue, Sadow says.
Atlassian is one company that has committed to being fully flexible. In August 2020, it announced its Team Anywhere policy, which allows employees to decide if they want to be in-office or not. Since then, the company has more than doubled in headcount, from 4,907 to 11,067. (Atlassian also laid off 500 employees in March because of the "difficult macroeconomic environment.") "We're doing [remote work] unequivocally and we're winning faster than everybody else," co-CEO Scott Farquhar told me recently. Atlassian still has offices, but it allows employees to decide when (and whether) they want to go in. About half of the company's new hires live more than two hours from an office, which means they were in locations that Atlassian previously wouldn't have been able to hire from. The company has also been able to increase diversity because it can hire people who live outside major cities; previously, its biggest U.S. office and headquarters was in the San Francisco Bay Area.
Last edited: