It's fascinating how "Rian Johnson is to blame for TROS not being good" is picking up as some serious rhetoric, not gonna lie. Especially when one of the biggest criticisms about TLJ was that it didn't leave any major "plot threads" for TROS to resolve and gave JJ a blank slate to go anywhere he wanted.
Like, don't you see the paradox in that? If JJ is as good of a film maker as some assume he could've easily tailored a film that's solid in its own right. Not every damn sequel needs to follow up on shallow threads and setup. What's important is that the movie is good as a movie. Even when TROS is billed as the ending of a saga, it's important for the movie to stand as its own piece of work and have storylines and arcs that are self-sustaining.
If your actual problem with TROS is that TLJ didn't give Abrams an obvious plotline to pursue then you're basically admitting that the man is a hack who can't tell a story without someone laying the framework out for him.
wow its almost like every decent JJ movie has had someone laying the groundwork for him, interesting