For real lol, right now the weather is so fucking hot here in Peru that I've been working from home basically only wearing shorts, I only pur a shirt on if I gotta turn my camera on.
- young girl character has costume with super short shorts, with MULTIPLE camera angles pointing right at her crotch
"its just hot in Mexico!"
but yes, it us "weirdos" that are the problem for noticing it, fuck me that is a take alright.
oh it's okay they're only showing us like 90% of the outline of this teenager's crotch for a split second.
like that shot would be maybe somewhat more palatable if she was actually wearing pants, still pretty fucking weird they intentionally stuck a camera like directly under her crotch. it's not like they're not in control of these angles they picked, and someone probably storyboarded & blocked out over several months
somewhere not under her? it's not under her for the entire rest of the game when you're playing it. why do they actually need to put the camera right under her when she's doing a flip?
That's fine. I watched the trailer on a big ass 77" screen, so I couldn't help but notice. If people aren't bother by it, then that's their prerogative. I just think it's an odd combination of camera placement, the character's age, and the character's outfit. Change any one of those and it would be a nothing burger.
Exactly.
I personally feel it's as sexualized as one makes it. We have gymnasts who wear next to nothing doing acrobats in positions that would make normies blush but professionals and adults can easily and casually see the art and athleticism of the body on display without going to horny jail.
Gymnasts wear those clothes because they are functional. These are videogame characters they can wear literally whatever the creator wants them to lol
When you are watching a gymnast perform you understand why they are wearing what they do. There is an understanding of what the focus is.
Explain to me why this videogame character needs to wear tiny shorts that she flips around in while the camera inexplicably positions itself right under her supposedly also out of necessity? In a videogame that is otherwise entirely full of ass shots and suggestive poses and embraces that aspect of itself? Like it's pretty in your face all over the game, you can't pretend the developers didn't intend anything with this design and these camera angles.
It comes down to whether you view the existence of these shots as they dev team thinking:
"I'm gonna sneak in some crotch shots for fan service"
Or
"Out audience is mature enough to not sexualise the human body doing gymnast style poses"
Watching the trailer I only ever saw it as the second option.
Maybe that's just naive of me though.
I think this all comes down to the last quote in if you think they gave Lily those shorts and used those camera angles on purpose for whatever reason. Let's be real here, Capcom among other fighting game developers tend to play with sex appeal. It's the reason why people go nuts with seeing breasts, thongs, booty shots etc in DoA, Street Fighter & MK, among others. Then with anime and Japan there's something about playing with innocence, flirtatious behaviour, showing cleavage, shame etc. Look at DBZ's Master Roshi and his 'relationship' w/ the females as a perfect example.
Cammy is a clear example and the most obvious way of using this sex appeal with her poses, flexes and what not. Now nobody's saying shorts equals sexy or for athletes even. Hell, I get that for a country that's hot AF that women and men alike wear shorts and that athletes / gymnasts wear shorts. It's odd actually how people react to a legitimate grip or questioning, especially jumping to the "get horny by looking at" conclusion. The irony in responding with this type of judgment and calling us perverts, sexist or whatever just by bringing up a point - without even using words like sexy or anything like that - actually says more about you than us.
It's as pointed out above about the combination of her youth - something you just cannot deny and have to take into account - her size and the camera angles during her specials. I personally believe it is naive to think they didn't think about this and didn't realize it would get this type of reaction. Hell, I think they might even purposefully did this - the camera angles in particular - because they know there's an audience and type of people out there who go nuts over this. Maybe teenagers, the waifu nerds, but definitely some crowd.
My main issue is then not even necessarily with the outfit, but knowing there's people out there who do get off by looking at female characters in certain outfits and that I question their intent. The first child like character and you give us shots of her crotch as well as almost nothing but underwear? Definitely not a coincidence, I'll tell you that. Now what they are trying to achieve beats me, but it would easy to avoid all of this with some proper shorts and just a different camera angle. As pointed out, they take a lot of time mapping this all out so they CHOSE to show her off like this.
I have calmed a bit on how much this bothers me, but cannot shake that they did this on purpose and if they are catering to a certain perverse crowd, then it's really off-putting. We cannot deny the reality of waifu crowd, people who sexualize fighting game characters, cry wolf over MK9 characters not having their leotard outfits anymore or even that Cammy now wears long pants. Hell, in this thread one guy said he cancels his pre-order because Cammy is not wearing pants instead of a leotard. Don't tell me that is not about some fetish...
Just as an example, I went to DBS: Broly movie in the cinema and the amount of whistles and woohoo's when they showed a female's butt - one of those new aliens - I believe, was so cringe to me. It's like it's porn for nerds who don't dare to watch porn, because they fear they might blow their load if they come near the real thing. And the issue I have is mainly because I know the type of people this attracts.
I know they cannot and maybe should not have to take into account what people phantasize about or go nuts over, but I think they could've easily asked themselves questions like: "What kind of message does it send to have a very small, young, child like character with shortest of shorts shown off in full display during her specials?" or "what do we want our fans to take away from this character and does her outfit and way we present her resemble that?"
I think they could've simply misjudged how people would feel about this, but don't they have test panels and such? They at least have advisors who told them to drop the feathers and the face paint, so I wonder how did this pass the test and other elements didn't? Wouldn't it be way more logical to drop what could be potentially perceived as off-putting over some stereotypical features that is staple of SF and is still prevalent in the game in so many other characters?
Just my two cents.