Makes a change from thieving from supermarkets, now they are just stealing trees. Anything not nailed down, eh. :DThey can hardly get full trucks of stuff into Ukraine, you expect me to believe they're gonna set up an entire logging operation and ship all that back, too?
They can hardly get full trucks of stuff into Ukraine, you expect me to believe they're gonna set up an entire logging operation and ship all that back, too?
Are you comfortable with a global recession and all that entails?China needs to be sanctioned to hell and back with Russia. Now is also a test to see EU being strong on this because it can have major effects economically, but it needs to be done, I want to see luxury good bans (as a German, the automobile industry here can eat shit for a while, idgaf), and flight bans to and from China, as a start. then see what China decides. If China continues, begin ramping up sanctios and begin to add clauses with acondition regarding the release of Uyghurs.
German agency for information system security warns about using Kaspersky anti virus.
yeah, scorched earth approach. They're already doing it to the citiesEven if that deforestation story was true I see it being more about causing even more harm and destruction to Ukraine as nation then it's about getting sellable wood.
I don't think people realize what Bloomberg Terminal is, it's completely legitThe tweet you mentioned comes directly from bloomberg terminal
The Bloomberg Terminal is a computer software system provided by the financial data vendor Bloomberg L.P. that enables professionals in the financial service sector and other industries to access Bloomberg Professional Services through which users can monitor and analyze real-time financial market data and place trades on the electronic trading platform.[1] It was developed by employees working for businessman Michael Bloomberg. The system also provides news, price quotes, and messaging across its proprietary secure network. It is well known among the financial community for its black interface, which has become a recognizable trait of the service.[2] The first version of the terminal was released in December 1982.
Most large financial firms have subscriptions to Bloomberg Professional Services. Many exchanges charge their own additional fees for access to real time price feeds across the terminal. The same applies to various news organizations.
All Bloomberg Terminals are leased in two-year cycles (in the late 1990s and early 2000s, three-year contracts were an option), with leases originally based on how many displays were connected to each terminal (this predated the move to Windows-based application). Most Bloomberg setups have between two and six displays. It is available for an annual fee of $20,000 per user ($24,000 per year for the small number of firms that use only one terminal).[3] As of October 2016, there were 325,000 Bloomberg Terminal subscribers worldwide.[4]
yes if that's what it takes to send a message to China to not fuel a war of aggression in EuropeAre you comfortable with a global recession and all that entails?
yes if that's what it takes to send a message to China to not fuel a war of aggression in Europe
i'm absolutely done with pacifist bullshit, seeing first hand my lifelong bestfriend that is ukrainian and what her family has had to go through since the invasion
Lots of footage of dead russian special forces in mariupol on social media today.
Apparently the russian 22nd special forces brigade got whacked by azov forces.
Is this wise, won't Russians be watching from the air or space to see were he is?
Almost 2.5 - 3 to 1 advantage troop wise. ~245K active army, ~200K Reserves, Lets say ~20K foreign volunteers (hard number to verify right now) versus ~150 to 200K estimate of Russians.So would this confirm Russia as outnumbered now by the defending force?
We should maybe think twice before cheering on Nazis.
Russia claims its forces have taken full control over Ukraine's Kherson region
They say they are now in full control of the region.metro.co.uk
Obviously whatever Russia says can't be trusted, but they claim to have shot down 6 TB2 drones in the last day.
Sorry if this sounds stupid, but like doesn't Ukraine has any long-range missiles? Couldn't they also attack Russia inside of its borders? with missiles or drones. Some military bases, ammunition warehouses, fuel supplies, things like this.
Or would that gives Russia the chance to play the victim card?
They do, and they have. They've struck inside Russia and Belarus. They just don't have many weapons like that in their inventory, so they have to use them sparingly, both to maximize their effectiveness, and to avoid detection by the Russians.Sorry if this sounds stupid, but like doesn't Ukraine has any long-range missiles? Couldn't they also attack Russia inside of its borders? with missiles or drones. Some military bases, ammunition warehouses, fuel supplies, things like this.
Or would that gives Russia the chance to play the victim card?
With zero pictures of wreckage so far as well. Obviously the TB-2 is using a tactic that is evading ground radars and Russia is too scared to commit air power to try and sweep these drones.I wouldn't trust anything Russians have to say about TB2's. Week ago they claimed having shot more of them down than Ukraine ever had, and now 6 more?
Nah I'm not thinking twice about anything that impacts the side sieging a captive city of trapped civilians.
So would this confirm Russia as outnumbered now by the defending force?
They did a couple of times, at least in the earlier days of the war, hitting a Russian airbase or airport. However, I assume anti air defenses will be present there, so it may be a waste of missiles as well.Sorry if this sounds stupid, but like doesn't Ukraine has any long-range missiles? Couldn't they also attack Russia inside of its borders? with missiles or drones. Some military bases, ammunition warehouses, fuel supplies, things like this.
Or would that gives Russia the chance to play the victim card?
Ukraine hit 2 airfields and a supply depot in Russia. Ukraine was (presumably) using Tochka-U ballistic launchers, with a range of 150 kmThey do, and they have. They've struck inside Russia and Belarus. They just don't have many weapons like that in their inventory, so they have to use them sparingly, both to maximize their effectiveness, and to avoid detection by the Russians.
uhhh no lmaoTwitter as a source should be bannable – at least from this thread. In general too but whatever.
Huge peeve of mine for obvious reasons.
I was thinking of a supply convoy that I thought was struck in Belarus by drones, but I might be mistaken.Ukraine hit 2 airfields and a supply depot in Russia. Ukraine was (presumably) using Tochka-U ballistic launchers, with a range of 150 km
Ukraine has not attacked Belarus yet, as they are unwilling to give Lukashenko a reason for a ground invasion.
The tweet you mentioned comes directly from bloomberg terminal
Chief of General staff of Ukraine saying the reserves were "partially deployed", and a counter-offensive is on the way.
The waters are supposedly mined as well according to a Naval alert message sent by Ukraine (like a NOTAM).They've lost the element of surprise, logistics are awful, the land forces are nowhere near close enough to support, and Odessa has been turned into a fortress with the coast completely mined
Seems like they'd be sending men to die if they tried it
They've lost the element of surprise, logistics are awful, the land forces are nowhere near close enough to support, and Odessa has been turned into a fortress with the coast completely mined
Seems like they'd be sending men to die if they tried it