• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Tallshortman

Member
Oct 29, 2017
1,649
Obviously not with 200k. Russia has the capability to deploy close to 700k right now. You would need a multiplier of like 30 for a full country occupation, but I don't think they would go that route, Bifurcate Kyiv and points east, force Zelensky to resign.

Russia almost certainly can't afford to deploy 700k in a long term occupation, even if they're mostly conscripts.
 
Feb 19, 2018
1,654
Yes. But the further it moves inland, the further it is from friendly AA/radar installations. The deeper it goes, the more supplies have been consumed, the more distance must be traveled to get out.
Agreed, trying to turn the entire convoy around would be an absolute nightmare, the highway isn't particularly wide and the convoy is 60 KILOMETRES LONG. That said, with that many vehicles and the convoy moving at snail's pace and them betting all of their chips on this play, I guess that the Russians are doing their darnest to prevent any ambushes from happening with escorts and make the convoy as tough to attack as possible. But the Ukrainians would be mad not to take a shot at it eventually.
 

Saganator

Member
Oct 26, 2017
7,160
What would be the best way to take out that convoy??
It's probably well covered with anti air unfortunately, because there's probably some A-10 pilots out there salivating. Some brave Ukrainians with Javelins or other anti tank weapons to take out a few of the vehicles in the lead and and middle. Or placing some type of mine or remotely detonated explosives ahead of the convoy on the road could really slow them down too. I don't think you destroy the whole thing honestly, you turn it into an even bigger logistical nightmare than it already is.

Edit: Thought convoy was still in Russia, but it is not. Sorry!
 
Last edited:

Android

Member
Oct 28, 2017
803
Vancouver
Even with conventional warfare, I feel like folks forget that Chechnya was a state with slightly over 1M people. Kyiv alone has 3M+ with Ukraine at 40M.
Sadly I think at some point soon there will be a concerted effort to greatly reduce those numbers ala Syria. Create diaspora of 10-20 million people, plus kill millions and then offer free land to Russians, splitting the land with the Belarusians. All he really cares about is the land, its resources and pushing his borders futher from Moscow.
 

toneroni

Member
Oct 25, 2017
379
It's still in Russia so it's probably well covered with anti air unfortunately, because there's probably some A-10 pilots out there salivating. Some brave Ukrainians with Javelins or other anti tank weapons to take out a few of the vehicles in the lead and and middle. Or placing some type of mine or remotely detonated explosives ahead of the convoy on the road could really slow them down too. I don't think you destroy the whole thing honestly, you turn it into an even bigger logistical nightmare than it already is.
Oh the convoy is still in Russia?? I thought it was in Ukraine for some reason. Been wondering why it hasn't been taken out yet. Wish they had an A10 or AC130 for this
 

Saganator

Member
Oct 26, 2017
7,160
Oh the convoy is still in Russia?? I thought it was in Ukraine for some reason. Been wondering why it hasn't been taken out yet. Wish they had an A10 or AC130 for this
Last I heard it's gotten bigger, but still in Russia. If I'm wrong I'll edit that part out. Probably still covered by AA though

Edit: Not in Russia
 

charmeleon

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,385
It's still in Russia so it's probably well covered with anti air unfortunately, because there's probably some A-10 pilots out there salivating. Some brave Ukrainians with Javelins or other anti tank weapons to take out a few of the vehicles in the lead and and middle. Or placing some type of mine or remotely detonated explosives ahead of the convoy on the road could really slow them down too. I don't think you destroy the whole thing honestly, you turn it into an even bigger logistical nightmare than it already is.
The convoy is in Ukraine.

It said the column covered the entire stretch of road from near Antonov airport, some 18 miles from the capital, to the town of Prybirsk - a distance of approximately 40 miles.

news.yahoo.com

Vast Russian army convoy spotted north of Kyiv

A huge Russian military convoy stretching some 40 miles was spotted Monday by a US satellite imaging company just north of the Ukrainian capital Kyiv, which has already repulsed several assaults.
 

Conditional-Pancakes

The GIFs of Us
Member
Jun 25, 2020
10,869
the wilderness
Find out your heritage companies are a scam?!

These genetic testing companies do provide the service they're advertising, so in that sense they're not strictly speaking a "scam". But the DNA (and non-DNA) data collected from customers can in a lot of cases be used for a lot more, including being sold to third parties to be used for "researches" (that's the term most companies are using). What exactly are those researches and who is conducting them is never clear.
 
Oct 27, 2017
5,421
As exciting as it is to see the "good guys" sticking it to Russia, we all need to be prepared for a likely outcome: weeks-long fighting for Kyiv ending with the loss of independence, followed by months or years of insurgency, all resulting in millions of refugees and tens or hundreds of thousands of deaths.
 

scitek

Member
Oct 27, 2017
10,104
This is horrific to even think about, but say Russia takes control of Ukraine, and Putin just keeps killing civilians out of pure spite because he has a bruised ego, would NATO still just sit by as he murders potentially thousands or even tens of thousands of innocent people?
 

Avitus

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,935
As exciting as it is to see the "good guys" sticking it to Russia, we all need to be prepared for a likely outcome: weeks-long fighting for Kyiv ending with the loss of independence, followed by months or years of insurgency, all resulting in millions of refugees and tens or hundreds of thousands of deaths.

It only becomes likely when Russian forces demonstrate an ability to overwhelm and rout forces in areas UA has chosen to defend. So far they haven't. Kyiv somehow being pacified in weeks (would be one of the greatest military accomplishments of the last 100 years) doesn't magically end things either.
 

sfedai0

Member
Oct 27, 2017
10,001
This is horrific to even think about, but say Russia takes control of Ukraine, and Putin just keeps killing civilians out of pure spite because he has a bruised ego, would NATO still just sit by as he murders potentially thousands or even tens of thousands of innocent people?

Given how the world has reacted to genocides taking place to non white people, you can be guaranteed the west will step in with just more than sanctions.
 

AniHawk

No Fear, Only Math
Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,184
This is horrific to even think about, but say Russia takes control of Ukraine, and Putin just keeps killing civilians out of pure spite because he has a bruised ego, would NATO still just sit by as he murders potentially thousands or even tens of thousands of innocent people?

probably. it wouldn't be the only country with human rights violations that nato's ignored.

my very limited understanding is that nato is a strategic alliance. it's not a peacekeeping entity. what you might be thinking of is whether or not the united nations would send some kind of peacekeeping force.
 

hom3land

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,616



Sadly this is what I'm expecting.. the question is how long can the west holdout while watching cities get leveled.
 

Thordinson

Banned
Aug 1, 2018
18,129
This is horrific to even think about, but say Russia takes control of Ukraine, and Putin just keeps killing civilians out of pure spite because he has a bruised ego, would NATO still just sit by as he murders potentially thousands or even tens of thousands of innocent people?

Yes, sadly. It wouldn't be the first time and the West doesn't want to start WW3.
 

eathdemon

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
9,690



Sadly this is what I'm expecting.. the question is how long can the west holdout while watching cities get leveled.

again we cant directly interfere b/c it would be ww3 and nuclear holocaust. that being said, the worse the atrocities the harder it makes for removel as sections that if it stays in place will likely couse Russia to collapse.
 

Dekuman

Member
Oct 27, 2017
19,028
This is horrific to even think about, but say Russia takes control of Ukraine, and Putin just keeps killing civilians out of pure spite because he has a bruised ego, would NATO still just sit by as he murders potentially thousands or even tens of thousands of innocent people?
probably. it wouldn't be the only country with human rights violations that nato's ignored.

my very limited understanding is that nato is a strategic alliance. it's not a peacekeeping entity. what you might be thinking of is whether or not the united nations would send some kind of peacekeeping force.

I don't think that can be or will be ignored , the way the invasion has played out makes sure it won't be.

I also don't think the Russians have the appetite to take over and occupy the whole country. They're probably trying to get their original objectives achieved and hope they get the rest of what they want via negotiations.
 

scitek

Member
Oct 27, 2017
10,104
probably. it wouldn't be the only country with human rights violations that nato's ignored.

my very limited understanding is that nato is a strategic alliance. it's not a peacekeeping entity. what you might be thinking of is whether or not the united nations would send some kind of peacekeeping force.

Ah, you're right. I was just wondering if such a scenario might actually cause any outside forces to actually intervene. Sounds like the answer is no.
 

PshycoNinja

Game Developer
Verified
Oct 25, 2017
3,227
Los Angeles



the-office-steve-carell.gif
 

maabus1999

Member
Oct 26, 2017
9,018
I don't think that can be or will be ignored , the way the invasion has played out makes sure it won't be.

I also don't think the Russians have the appetite to take over and occupy the whole country. They're probably trying to get their original objectives achieved and hope they get the rest of what they want via negotiations.
Yeah, I don't think anyone knows what that is...

Really think they thought Ukraine would just surrender and they would move on. Once that didn't occur, they continued following the same gameplan which is to invade Kyiv to put in a new Government...that the General Staff has to know now is impossible. But Putin doesn't want to change course.
 

Loxley

Prophet of Truth
Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,640
It needs to be repeated that Russia does not have the money and resources to invade and occupy Ukraine indefinitely, and that was before the entire planet united over the last week to tank their economy. Ukraine is a large country with 44 million people, Russia simply cannot control that much territory with less than 200,000 troops. Factor in the majority of those 44 million are determined to fuck with Russia's forces as much as humanly possible, and you make it even more of an impossible task.

We're in completely uncharted territory here. Nobody thought NATO, the EU and US would react anywhere nearly as strongly as they have in the last 4-5 days. No one has any idea how much further this will escalate on either side.
 

Maquiladora

Member
Nov 16, 2017
5,108
I just cannot see any realistic "win" scenarios for Putin here. Both in terms of Ukraine and Russia's place in the entire realm of global security for decades to come.

The more I think about it the more it looks like one of the biggest strategic errors imaginable.
 

hom3land

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,616
again we cant directly interfere b/c it would be ww3 and nuclear holocaust. that being said, the worse the atrocities the harder it makes for removel as sections that if it stays in place will likely couse Russia to collapse.


I get that but, when a place like Kharkov gets destroyed, thousand of civilian deaths,... And then they turn to Kyiv. There's going to be a demand to do something.
 

Tater

Member
Oct 30, 2017
2,595
As exciting as it is to see the "good guys" sticking it to Russia, we all need to be prepared for a likely outcome: weeks-long fighting for Kyiv ending with the loss of independence, followed by months or years of insurgency, all resulting in millions of refugees and tens or hundreds of thousands of deaths.
I think that was always an outcome that many people expected from the get go, but the past several days has shown that things aren't always a foregone conclusion. The West has rallied support in a way that wasn't anticipated, and there's a good chance that public awareness will last longer than the current news cycle.

I believe. (And donate)