Not to mention they don't have the funding for it atm. It all went to ryzen.They'll have to pull out the same magic they used to catch Intel... But Nvidia is nowhere near as complacent as Intel were.
Not to mention they don't have the funding for it atm. It all went to ryzen.They'll have to pull out the same magic they used to catch Intel... But Nvidia is nowhere near as complacent as Intel were.
YesHow are AMDs drivers these days? Do they get "game ready drivers" before big releases like Nvidia?
O yeah. They restructured their driver team few years back, for a while they released more drivers than nvidia. They do not only game driver updates, but also work on tons of side-services accessible via redesigned driver control app.How are AMDs drivers these days? Do they get "game ready drivers" before big releases like Nvidia?
O yeah. They restructured their driver team few years back, for a while they released more drivers than nvidia. They do not only game driver updates, but also work on tons of side-services accessible via redesigned driver control app.
This gets said in every amd thread. Probably the same person saying it.Finally! Some competition from AMD so that i can buy cheaper Nvidia cards!!!
Thanks AMD!
This gets said in every amd thread. Probably the same person saying it.
We get it, you have posters of Jensen Huang you masturbate to. No need to keep repeating it.
They're already competing in the mid-range with the Radeon 5700 and 5700 XT, which are better than Nvidia's similarly priced cards. But they're missing in the high end. They need to compete against the 2080 Ti to make enthusiasts excited.
I think you've rewritten history in your mind.I remember when people decried AMD "going console" as the death knell of the company.
The thread title is like two sentences merged into one time I read this thread title and it hurt my brain.
I think you've rewritten history in your mind.
I remember people immediately saying that having both Microsoft and Sony was a huge get and years of "lol Nvidia salty" when the latter said they didn't care.
I should be welcoming what? Another PR bullshit coming from AMD (or their fanboys maybe in this case) instead of products actually capable competing with NV GPUs? Why should I welcome this?
The only obvious thing here is that my post which stated facts again got you wind up showing your pro-AMD agenda again.
It's totally possible for them to match NV's performance in every segment. But there are several apparent cave eats:i dont think its impossible for AMD to match NVidia's high end performance, their IPC right now is apparently on par or 1% ahead of Turing, but, whether or not they actually release a high end chip on par with NVidia depends on how scalable Navi really is in CU amount. is it still getting massive inefficiencies at 64CU like the vega 64, or has RDNA fixed the flaw from GCN.
For some reason people are continuing to make this weird comparison between Ryzen fighting Intel - who's actually been lazy for more than ten years now and managed to ran itself into many product lineup issues in both architecture (the forcing of useless iGPUs on desktops for example) and production (well known 10nm woes) - and Radeon fighting NV. The last fight is a completely different one, NV isn't Intel, they don't have any issues with their products or production lines (given that they don't have ones and use the same which AMD is using). There is no clear way of "killing NV" here, not to the extent of "killing Intel" at least. If anything, it's NV who's forcing AMD's hand currently in providing support for new rendering features in their future GPUs.Just built a Ryzen 3900X system (with 2080TI GPU) because it was a better value compared to intel for more cores, higher performance for 3D/video rendering and comparable performance in gaming compared to the i9.
Their new Epyc server CPU absolutely destroy Intel Xenon in both performance and price.
They're on a pretty good roll currently and I'm sure NVIDIA is in their sights.
I love your fanboy accusations when it is you who contually acts like a fanboy. Am I selling you or anyone else on AMD here or my pro-AMD agend, so show me where there is a pro-AMD agenda? Wake up and give your narrowminded cranium a shake, I said we should be welcoming better competition. That does not translate into AMD is better. Maye then you will figure out why we will continue to see high prces in the top end until AMD does get cards that can compete because they've already done that on mid-range cards.I should be welcoming what? Another PR bullshit coming from AMD (or their fanboys maybe in this case) instead of products actually capable competing with NV GPUs? Why should I welcome this?
The only obvious thing here is that my post which stated facts again got you wind up showing your pro-AMD agenda again.
It's totally possible for them to match NV's performance in every segment. But there are several apparent cave eats:
A. There is no apparent way of them offering better perf/dollar with RDNA(2) than what NV offer (Turing) or may offer (7nm) as a reaction to their launches.
B. They are likely to still be less power efficient meaning that power will still be the main limiting factor for them and it may result in them not being able to compete in the highest end of the market, just as it was for the last several generations.
C. I really don't see how "matching NV's performance" will "kill Nvidia". I especially don't see how just one new chip codenamed whatever may kill Nvidia. This is just baseless hype for fanboys consumption, nothing more at this point.
For some reason people are continuing to make this weird comparison between Ryzen fighting Intel - who's actually been lazy for more than ten years now and managed to ran itself into many product lineup issues in both architecture (the forcing of useless iGPUs on desktops for example) and production (well known 10nm woes) - and Radeon fighting NV. The last fight is a completely different one, NV isn't Intel, they don't have any issues with their products or production lines (given that they don't have ones and use the same which AMD is using). There is no clear way of "killing NV" here, not to the extent of "killing Intel" at least. If anything, it's NV who's forcing AMD's hand currently in providing support for new rendering features in their future GPUs.
Exactly but as you can see some are so entrenched in the GPU wars it's embarssing.AMD having a viable architecture finally and Intel launching their own product stack in 2020 are amazing news. Nvidia's domination has been terrible for everyone except their shareholders.
I'm not seeing this reported anywhere reputable, nor even the relavent /hardware and /amd subreddits, so methinks there is a high chance this is an entirely fabricated leak.
Better not just be 2080 Ti perf in 2020 for $100 less and without raytracing.
Yeah, while it would of course be great for AMD to finally inject some competition into the high-end/enthusiast bracket, the lack of corroboration brings to mind Wccftech's repeated claim in the lead-up the announcement of the 20xx Super sub-series that the 2080 Ti Super is absolutely, totally, definitely a thing.
Nothing new in this space.Exactly but as you can see some are so entrenched in the GPU wars it's embarssing.