What narrative?? It was just 78. Geez
Wait like an hour or so for everything to stabilize. It could easily go up.
There are caves, but they're not dungeons. They're linear paths through a cave environment.So only major outlet s received a review copy?
Eurogamer says there are no caves...
It was 78 at the time, it's still changing.
So only major outlet s received a review copy?
Eurogamer says there are no caves...
Yep.Pokémon is the only franchise that can consistently drop major features, cut content, and do nothing to grow and evolve and still end up reviewing well.
So you've played it?The Eurogamer review feels exactly like I feel about the game.
Are you new to yuoke?What narrative?
Most posts here are trying to mock people for having legitimate issues, not even talking about the NatDex, but stuff like the GTS cut has no defense.
Yup
Does OpenCritic take "Not scored" as Zeros then as that average doesn't mesh with the review scores it has listed
If she didn't make those tweets or those comments about this game, why are you bringing it up again?
Some exceptional mental gymnastics and confirmation bias going on ITT.
LmaoThe fans will look up and shout "save us"
The reviewers will look down and whisper "9.3"
Ok thanks...
Huh? Who are you again?
' In fact, Pokémon Sword and Shield is entirely dungeonless. There is no route or cave or building or wood more complex than Red, Blue and Yellow's Viridian Forest, the tutorial pseudo-dungeon at the start of generation one. Nothing in the game comes close to even Mt. Moon or Rock Tunnel, let alone the twelve floors of warp-pad mayhem in Silph Co. 'So only major outlet s received a review copy?
Eurogamer says there are no caves...
Pokémon is the only franchise that can consistently drop major features, cut content, and do nothing to grow and evolve and still end up reviewing well.
POKÉMON SWORD AND SHIELD ARE THE BEST POKÉMON GAMES IN YEARS
Pokémon is the only franchise that can consistently drop major features, cut content, and do nothing to grow and evolve and still end up reviewing well.
A lot of us do, because we fear a failure will be the only thing that will get GF to reassess the way they make these games and improve them.Man, some people here really want this to be a complete failure lol
It would still be incredibly linear ad easy, with a variety of technical issues and poor story pacing. Now whether those kinds of things will affect your enjoyment or not is of course personal.Man, some people here really want this to be a complete failure lol
As someone midly interested in this game (never played any), I wonder how good the game would be for someone like me considering I don't have the baggage of previous entries.
They don't take unscored as zeroes, but I believe the review score updates slowly. I've noticed that it doesn't update immediately as they add reviews.Does OpenCritic take "Not scored" as Zeros then as that average doesn't mesh with the review scores it has listed
I personally only noticed framerate issues in sandstorms in the wild area, aside from that it's fine. Pop in issues are a plenty.Just one thing I want to ask, are those technical issues that were in the other thread real? framerate drops. pop in etc?
If they are, how does it get these high scores? I need to read more reviews to see how they are commenting on the game technically.
It's better if you didn't play any others as you won't miss most of the stuff cut. It's all new and Pokémon games generally have decent enough single player campaigns.Man, some people here really want this to be a complete failure lol
As someone midly interested in this game (never played any), I wonder how good the game would be for someone like me considering I don't have the baggage of previous entries.