After hearing people say the 180-600 isn't as good as the Sony 200-600 those look pretty fucking good.
So basically it's close enough to the point where it doesn't matter and you would only care if you look at MTF charts.I mean, It may not be, but I don't think the difference is enough that when you take real world shots; I'm very happy with it.
My girlfriend has the Sony lens and I can't tell the difference, but I think the Sony lens is the current gold standard.
Pretty much. :)So basically it's close enough to the point where it doesn't matter and you would only care if you look at MTF charts.
Went to Snug Harbor in Staten Island with the Fuji XH2:
XH028299 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
XH028695 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
XH028011 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
XH028044 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
XH028079 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
XH028333 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
XH028424 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
XH028484 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
XH028740 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
XH028823 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
XH028844 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
XH028904 by Marcus Beasley, on Flickr
Thank you. Flowers are definitely a challenge, but glad I did good. Was trying to balance out the flower with bokeh. Most challenging thing was the wind blowing stuff all over the place.These are great. It's hard to pick the right aperture for flower photography, but you nailed it.
Tried the 90mm f2 and it was great but not something I would/can use indoors.
Vicky by samsh!t, on Flickr
DSCF9308.jpg by samsh!t, on Flickr
I have used it indoors plenty. It's just a matter of knowing what you want the shot to be.Tried the 90mm f2 and it was great but not something I would/can use indoors.
Vicky by samsh!t, on Flickr
DSCF9308.jpg by samsh!t, on Flickr