I was under the impression MHS didn't sell well enough to justify a sequel.I'm more inclined to believe the next MonHun hitting the Switch will be Stories 2 than a proper entry.
Stories was a bit of a disappointment for Capcom. the fact they didn't port the game to teh Switch in addition to mobile tells me they don't have faith in it going forwardI'm more inclined to believe the next MonHun hitting the Switch will be Stories 2 than a proper entry.
What? Different company altogether.
Capcom is killing it with MHW, RE2 and DMC5 is going to be big too. They don't need Nintendo anymore, but they'll still port their old stuff to it and some smaller franchises like AA.
Capcom is that ex that looks amazing ever since you broke up.
Marvelous developed MHStories
Yeah. Marvelous did. My bad. Edited the post.
They never really needed Nintendo, not even during the last decade. Sure MonHun was with em since 3, but Sony's platform wasn't strong enough till like 2015 for them to switch sides for the franchise again.Capcom is killing it with MHW, RE2 and DMC5 is going to be big too. They don't need Nintendo anymore, but they'll still port their old stuff to it and some smaller franchises like AA.
Capcom is that ex that looks amazing ever since you broke up.
Fair enough, but I was thinking along the lines of them waiting to port it close to release. Ah well.Stories was a bit of a disappointment for Capcom. the fact they didn't port the game to teh Switch in addition to mobile tells me they don't have faith in it going forward
Capcom is killing it with MHW, RE2 and DMC5 is going to be big too. They don't need Nintendo anymore, but they'll still port their old stuff to it and some smaller franchises like AA.
Capcom is that ex that looks amazing ever since you broke up.
Yeah. Marvelous did. My bad. Edited the post.
Not the same team though, at least the producers and the lead is different.
As of now for Nintendo published games.
Yoshi's Crafted World
Metroid Prime Trilogy
Fire Emblem Three Houses
Luigi's Mansion 3
Animal Crossing
Daemon X Machina
Pokémon gen 8
2D Zelda
Star Fox GP
Marvel Ultimate Alliance 3
Bayonetta 3 or Kamiya's new IP
A couple eShop games
1 or 2 Wii U ports (besides NSMBU Deluxe)
Bonus-
SNES Online Classic
N64 Mini in some fashion for me
New knowledge to me. Amazing. Thanks for the insight.The producer(Kenichiro Tsukuda) was "line producer" on MHS and it was mentioned during E3 interviews that a lot of the team worked on MHS. I can't remember if they mentioned that working with Nintendo came about because Nintendo brought MHS west.
Next week is also fairly soon!
Because people tend to humanize corporations, hence the ex metaphor. There's a sense that the either/or dynamic between Switch and everything else among enthusiast circles must extend to corporate planning as well. Barring any bad blood between Nintendo and Capcom, the only question that matters is this;I still have to understand why Capcom couldn't be successful and supporting all systems at the same time.
Drop in and give us a wink if you hear of the Trilogy being bumped out of the schedule?Its Metroid and the 2D game is Zelda, both coming out this year .. supposedly..
Paradoxically the lack of gamepad would make the combat system much better.Nintendo can keep the Paper Mario Color Splash port with that trash battle system. All those cards were on the Gamepad. Now there is none.
Just remaster TTYD
For 3DSNintendo can keep the Paper Mario Color Splash port with that trash battle system. All those cards were on the Gamepad. Now there is none.
Just remaster TTYD
Yeah, Directs are planned way ahead but I believe it's possible they delayed this one in order to deliver the bad news before.In hindsight, that supposedly sounds a lot like MPT moved from the 100% happening vibe it got in late November leading up to TGA to a more, well its been rumored to come this year but things got pretty quiet now. I definitely now think this started in December and was solidified by early January that Retro is taking over. Which makes me even more certain that the development update taking a couple of weeks for them to release is definitely a signal that a direct is coming next week. It just feels right, like they wanted to be 100% that the message for MP4 is the one we got, before releasing any other news.
My initial thought was we'd get a direct sometime next week (or early Feb) before the investor meeting and to distract fans let down by the MP4 news but now people are predicting it'll be in march? wouldn't it be weird for them to stay silent that long? fans are going to lose it lol
then again, we can't predict nintendo.
Nintendo can keep the Paper Mario Color Splash port with that trash battle system. All those cards were on the Gamepad. Now there is none.
Just remaster TTYD
Third party will be more of the same. By that I mean do expect ports of older titles. Not that there is anything wrong with that, but the amount of 'new' third parties (that aren't family / JP games) won't be that different from last year.
Certainly a few big surprises this year though.
Investors aren't going to be too pleased if Nintendo goes into its investors meeting with a substantially-delayed Metroid Prime 4, a relative lack of confidence in reaching its hardware targets, and no concrete information or dates for its major 2019 software like Animal Crossing and Pokemon 2019. That's why I think the Direct will be this Tuesday. Nintendo's got to wash away some of the bad news somehow, and some information on major software for 2019 will do just that.
Color Splash was good; you guys are just mean.Nintendo can keep the Paper Mario Color Splash port with that trash battle system. All those cards were on the Gamepad. Now there is none.
Just remaster TTYD
Should we expect this few surprises to be from the same companies and developers that have been supporting Switch in the last 2 years (Bethesda, Ubisoft, etc) or could it be something from unexpected companies?Third party will be more of the same. By that I mean do expect ports of older titles. Not that there is anything wrong with that, but the amount of 'new' third parties (that aren't family / JP games) won't be that different from last year.
Certainly a few big surprises this year though.
That's because you are a good person with a kind heart.
I'll go with Square Enix. There was some random BS twitter profile that predicted the FF ports last summer and then deleted the entire account after E3. They said that Square already has on the pipeline some new rpg for Switch and Bravely ports or new game on that series.Should we expect this few surprises to be from the same companies and developers that have been supporting Switch in the last 2 years (Bethesda, Ubisoft, etc) or could it be something from unexpected companies?
Except nothing said hints that they 'lack confidence'. They said for the get go reaching 20 million ship was a challenged but durable.
That's not the way guidance works. If they fail to meet their guidance, it means they predicted wrong and did not meet what they told investors to expect. It's not like they get to go "well, 20 million was really a stretch goal, we were really thinking we'd sell 19 million but we just wanted to challenge ourselves, 19 million is still a lot guys!!1"
20 million was the guidance. You don't want to miss your guidance, because it shows you weren't able to correctly predict the future of your business. This is why companies usually err a little on the conservative side and put out a number they think they'll hit, not a stretch goal to challenge themselves.
Missing guidance would absolutely be bad news.
As a publicly owned company you don't set stretch goals and challenges.Except again, nothing said so far that didn't meet guidance. And it wasn't even a 'prediction' so much as a challenged as Nintendo themselves stated from the start. In this case, Nintendo did do a stretch goal instead of being conservative.
Except again, nothing said so far that didn't meet guidance. And it wasn't even a 'prediction' so much as a challenged as Nintendo themselves stated from the start. In this case, Nintendo did do a stretch goal instead of being conservative.
As a publicly owned company you don't set stretch goals and challenges.
That's not how it works. You are not even allowed to do so. You have to be as accurate and truthful as possible.
Jesus Christ. Don't ever get in to investing money.
Deliberately predicting in your financial reports that you're going to do better than you internally plan to/think is actually reasonable is how you end up with your company in serious trouble.
Except again, nothing said so far that didn't meet guidance. And it wasn't even a 'prediction' so much as a challenged as Nintendo themselves stated from the start.
In this case, Nintendo did do a stretch goal instead of being conservative.
Because people tend to humanize corporations, hence the ex metaphor. There's a sense that the either/or dynamic between Switch and everything else among enthusiast circles must extend to corporate planning as well. Barring any bad blood between Nintendo and Capcom, the only question that matters is this;
"We're making a lot of money supporting PC/PS/XB, could we make even more money by also supporting Switch?"
If the answer is 'Yes' and the logistics work out, then the Switch will get more than small games and remasters from Capcom.
Forward-looking statements are always a prediction. They pretty much legally have to be; otherwise you're opening yourself up to shareholder lawsuits. You can't make statements about your company's future performance in bad faith.
They may have described it as a "challenge" to themselves, because it's a large impressive number, but they wouldn't have given that number if they didn't think they would hit it.
If that's true, that's fundamentally unwise.
Why are we talking financials in a first party thread? The stuffy technicalities of financial forecasts and investors are the game of Nintendo discussions, I swear.