How? I can't follow your reasoning. Are we again under the assumption that power sells hardware and not brand, games and price?
in fact im mixing exatly all of those...
most games will be released on all three platforms ..lockhart,ps5,ana (in short, I am talking about all those blockbusters that the vast majority of the market is interested in buying and are the reason why they buy a console ...like cod/bf/assassinscreed/destiny/fifa etc etc etc)
these following the logic of price / performance ... you can play on a console that presumably will cost less (say 100/150 as I wrote previously)
So they remain in the high spectrum of the market with Ps5 against Anaconda ... consoles capable of running the same games with all the improvements that their hardware will allow ... so it will be power at the expense of the price something that will be of interest to enthusiasts gamers . But what if Anaconda is more powerful?
Of course there will be exclusives, and part of the sales will also be the result of this choice (although it is too early to say, given that we do not know what Microsoft will do with all the new studios)
what I mean ... is that for me ... it makes no sense at this point to release a 499 console for Sony ..everything is too risky and as you have just said the vast majority of people are more careful about the price and games than the teraflops
Every few posts from you and you do a Sony is doomed one, what's with you?
im intrigued by the different strategy...and i dont trust that ps5 is 499 for different reason i wrote
i never said sony is doomed...and i would never say that...ww ps sales will always win