Absolutely incredible.
Mars doesn't have enough atmosphere for a pure parachute landing. Its also too big to drive off a lander.Is the sky crane method so they can decelerate with more control (engines + adjusting cable length) or other reason they don't just go ahead and land the whole thing? Seems to add complexity so must be a reason for it
Is the sky crane method so they can decelerate with more control (engines + adjusting cable length) or other reason they don't just go ahead and land the whole thing? Seems to add complexity so must be a reason for it
Is the sky crane method so they can decelerate with more control (engines + adjusting cable length) or other reason they don't just go ahead and land the whole thing? Seems to add complexity so must be a reason for it
The rockets on a conventional lander can kick up dust, particles or create craters which would compromise the rover. With sky crane, there will not be those external factors that would effect itIs the sky crane method so they can decelerate with more control (engines + adjusting cable length) or other reason they don't just go ahead and land the whole thing? Seems to add complexity so must be a reason for it
Space X Starship presentation a couple years back.
Is the sky crane method so they can decelerate with more control (engines + adjusting cable length) or other reason they don't just go ahead and land the whole thing? Seems to add complexity so must be a reason for it
Is the sky crane method so they can decelerate with more control (engines + adjusting cable length) or other reason they don't just go ahead and land the whole thing? Seems to add complexity so must be a reason for it
This one will be part of a 3 phase mission to bring samples back to earth.im a stupid baby i realize the Herculean effort, but what's dif between this rover and the last one?