What are you most excited about?

  • The search for biosignatures

    Votes: 174 37.2%
  • Ingenuity, the Martian helicopter

    Votes: 99 21.2%
  • ayy lmao

    Votes: 94 20.1%
  • Photos and videos from Mars

    Votes: 101 21.6%

  • Total voters
    468

papertowel

Member
Nov 6, 2017
2,026
Is the sky crane method so they can decelerate with more control (engines + adjusting cable length) or other reason they don't just go ahead and land the whole thing? Seems to add complexity so must be a reason for it
Mars doesn't have enough atmosphere for a pure parachute landing. Its also too big to drive off a lander.
 
Jul 18, 2018
5,905
Is the sky crane method so they can decelerate with more control (engines + adjusting cable length) or other reason they don't just go ahead and land the whole thing? Seems to add complexity so must be a reason for it
The rockets on a conventional lander can kick up dust, particles or create craters which would compromise the rover. With sky crane, there will not be those external factors that would effect it
 

NetMapel

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,509
Y'all, what we need is send a bunch of satellites with camera to orbit Mars before the next landing mission. Then we can hopefully use those orbiting satellites to record real footage of future probe landing. We need multiple cameras for multi-angle that can be used for editing later into Hollywood blockbusters.
 

DrForester

Mod of the Year 2006
Member
Oct 25, 2017
21,881
Is the sky crane method so they can decelerate with more control (engines + adjusting cable length) or other reason they don't just go ahead and land the whole thing? Seems to add complexity so must be a reason for it

Putting a landing system on the rover would make the rover a LOT bigger, and end up having to haul all that useless weight around as they roll around Mars.

And they can't do the airbag method of the old rovers because it's just way too big.

At most they might be able to have it land as a platform and have the rover roll off, kind of like the old rovers. But there's probably tech reasons why that's nto feasible either.
 

Charismagik

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,208
Still blows my mind that we humans can send something through space and pinpoint a landing in the vastness of space while everything is in motion. I know it's all math, but still
 

Empyrean Cocytus

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 27, 2017
18,821
Upstate NY
Is the sky crane method so they can decelerate with more control (engines + adjusting cable length) or other reason they don't just go ahead and land the whole thing? Seems to add complexity so must be a reason for it

It's because of the sensitivity of the instruments. Sending in an entire lander would kick up a ton of dust and probably wreck the rover.
 
First image

geomon

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,007
Miami, FL
EuiZDEYVIAEWeey