Regardless of the content of the videos, I think the headlines alone warrant the ban.
It's how I talk.
something something the middle is a great place to be
okay, can you then explain the "because someone was feeling emotional" bit?It's how I talk.
His age has absolutely no influence on this situation
No one has the discussion though, you're here practically not having it but focusing on being more upset at Motherboard for writing about it.
Writing about it is part of having a discussion
Of course Boogie would do this
Except I actually AM having the discussion, and have similar discussions all the time. I'm not "more focused on being upset at Motherboard". I'm not upset an Motherboard at all actually, I just think their tactic here is counter productive.
You on the otherhand are fostering discussion by driving by with "nope". And then hurling passive aggressive insults. Is that your idea of having a discussion. If so, lol!
Seriously, did I ever say I was upset with Motherboard? Or is literally making up shit your M.O.
If the titles are an issue, make it clear.Regardless of the content of the videos, I think the headlines alone warrant the ban.
The guy is clearly inciting hate and its clearly working if you look at the gleeful reactions.
I said it once, I'll say it again:
Behind closed doors, Youtube needs to have a conversation about their ethics & morals when it comes to Video Games.
When they've come to a decision on what type of Website & Business they want to be, make it KNOWN. Update TOS. Make the rules clear and concise.
guys, some people think killing feminists is good. others think killing feminists is bad. can't we all just meet in the middle and agree to beat feminists up without killing them?
i'm trying really hard not to read that post as dAmN eMoTiOnAl WoMeN, but...Isn;t it obvious only irrational people driven by emotion have issues with misogynistic gamers making money peddling feminist murder fantasies to alt right gamers.
A logical person would understand that it;s just a difference of opinion.
guys, some people think killing feminists is good. others think killing feminists is bad. can't we all just meet in the middle and agree to beat feminists up without killing them?
I've gone ahead and edited out the picture since it's rather large. This is some very strange whataboutism though, as I don't believe there is good reason for these other videos to stand either. Can't speak to their popularity relative to the one being discussed as the topic of this thread, which may be a reason why they attracted their attention and the ones you've listed haven't.
Are you arguing that it is good that these videos are still up?
If the titles are an issue, make it clear.
I think you know as well as I do; Youtube's TOS is way too vague for the amount of mediums that exist & the amount of content that can be uploaded to their site.
Where did you get the "someone at the office being emotional" information from?If the titles are an issue, make it clear.
I think you know as well as I do; Youtube's TOS is way too vague for the amount of mediums that exist & the amount of content that can be uploaded to their site.
Because lardo is one.Boogie keeps aligning himself with misogynists and racists huh.
You literally opened up with writing this article does a disservice to feminism dude.
Interesting. YouTube reinstated the channel.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7eAfUjR9gdIjoaoQaS0W-A
After I saw the feeding it to pigs Tweet i understood. I wonder what the policy is on drawing a swastika on snow.
Interesting. YouTube reinstated the channel.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7eAfUjR9gdIjoaoQaS0W-A
I'm arguing that Youtube's TOS is vague, which leads to inconsistencies.I've gone ahead and edited out the picture since it's rather large. This is some very strange whataboutism though, as I don't believe there is good reason for these other videos to stand either. Can't speak to their popularity relative to the one being discussed as the topic of this thread, which may be a reason why they attracted their attention and the ones you've listed haven't.
Are you arguing that it is good that these videos are still up?
Boogie keeps aligning himself with misogynists and racists huh.
Fucking seriouslyInteresting. YouTube reinstated the channel.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7eAfUjR9gdIjoaoQaS0W-A
Because I think the article is counter productive. And being counter productive is a disservice. I then followed up with why I believe that.
If you disagree that's fine. We can discuss like adults, and you might even change my mind if you have good points. By driving by with "nope" and passive aggressive insults is not a discussion.
A swastika is different from a manji symbol.Swastika is so contextual though - there would need to be case by case vetting I think. For a large, large part of the world, including my own, it's a religious symbol.
Killing feminists in a fucking video game where you can potentially kill everyone is bad, but watching KKK members burn to death or actively killing people with different opinions in gruesome ways is tolerated or even hilarious. Okay, gotcha. Not hypocritical at all.
And here I thought they had a spine for a second.Interesting. YouTube reinstated the channel.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7eAfUjR9gdIjoaoQaS0W-A
Like I said in my original post, I believe the channel was taken down because it was being flagged at such a fast rate..However, if it was the choice of another human being, that's not okay.Where did you get the "someone at the office being emotional" information from?
If the titles are an issue, make it clear.
I think you know as well as I do; Youtube's TOS is way too vague for the amount of mediums that exist & the amount of content that can be uploaded to their site.
If someone is using an ura manji it would be obvious.Not true. It is present in many religions, and doesn't face the same direction in all of them.
What? You're against human moderators for Youtube?However, if it was the choice of another human being, that's not okay.
Most video games reward you for killing shitty people. Why should this one be any different? It would be weird if killing KKK members didn't give honor.I don't think KKK can be equated to feminists at all.
But I dislike that the game gives you good karma for killing KKK members. I don't think any kind of killing should give you good karma.
Isn;t it obvious only irrational people driven by emotion have issues with misogynistic gamers making money peddling feminist murder fantasies to alt right gamers.
A logical person would understand that it;s just a difference of opinion.
I like how you're running on the assumption that someone "at the office" was feeling emotional. Oh and that this grown ass man is a kid. Great priorities fam.This situation is not in TOS.
In fact TOS is incredibly vague when it comes to certain mediums. (artwork, films, games, music)
That's probably why these videos have existed on Youtube's site for so long...
I said it once, I'll say it again:
Behind closed doors, Youtube needs to have a conversation about their ethics & morals when it comes to Video Games.
When they've come to a decision on what type of Website & Business they want to be, make it KNOWN. Update TOS. Make the rules clear and concise.
- IF Youtube doesn't allow violence based off race, gender etc in VIDEO GAMES, MAKE IT CLEAR.
- Figure out how this rule works...Do they not allow violence based off race, gender, religion if the game is an open sandbox? What if killing someone based off these factors are part of the story? GAMING IS TOO LARGE to not have these types of conversations.
- Give the kid his channel back.
- Then, give everyone a chance to clear their portfolio of any videos that violate those rules.
But to abruptly terminate a channel, because someone at the office was feeling emotional, is unprofessional.
straight up misogynistic dogwhistling, lbrI like how you're running on the assumption that someone "at the office" was feeling emotional.