Does he work for EA? Why is he of all people mad at reviews of a multiplatform game?
He's the vice president of xbox apparently lolDoes he work for EA? Why is he of all people mad at reviews of a multiplatform game?
Not sure what being exclusive or not has to do with him calling out 'in his opinion' a poor review in the industry he works in. Please explain.
Does he work for EA? Why is he of all people mad at reviews of a multiplatform game?
He also said people should be using "modern reviews" like watching streamers.
They have a marketing deal?Does he work for EA? Why is he of all people mad at reviews of a multiplatform game?
Not implicitly.One could argue that the game should appropriately teach you how to combo.
Havent played yet, but does Anthem do that?
Does he work for EA? Why is he of all people mad at reviews of a multiplatform game?
Because he is trying to discredit independent reviewers while pushing people toward streamers and influencers.How exactly is it "reviewers" plural wheb he is talking about that specific review?
If thats the case it should reflect poorly on Anthem and as such be a criticism in reviews... Its kind of important from what I can tell lol.
The first part I agree with, the tomb mission is poor design at it's best (worst? bestworst? worstbest?) but it really was pretty quick, I had to do it from scratch and it only took me about 3 1/2 solo. On the downside, it really turned me off Freeplay and I haven't gone back yet or see myself going back in the near future.
Regarding the second part well... one of the replies said it best (I don't know how to link Tweets so sorry if this doesn't work, I've never used Twitter.)
It makes you wonder if there simply aren't any options for Microsoft to cross promote games or if the person responsible for those deals can't tell the difference between a great and a shitty game.Translation:
"It sucks that the games we are cross promoting are getting mid reviews"
That Crackdown 3 + Anthem combo probably could have worked out better for MS in terms of critical reception.
Yeah this was me. Story always felt off but I was siding with believing him over instantly condemning him, because hate crimes are a real thing. It always felt "off" but just having that feeling isn't enough
That said, now that its looking like actual evidence is coming forth this was a hoax, I don't find it surprising considering how weird the original story was
That doesn't mean people should run around saying "I told you so" because 9 times out of 10 these hate crimes are the real deal. Higher than that more likely. But yeah, its also true that in strange circumstances like this, people shouldn't rush to condemn those that question things as long as its being done respectfully