I imagine he just keeps a closet full of Jonathon Majorses on ice to transfer his consciousness to.He could transfer his mind into another body upon death, so when Immortus says "I've lived a million lives" he means it quite literally.
I imagine he just keeps a closet full of Jonathon Majorses on ice to transfer his consciousness to.He could transfer his mind into another body upon death, so when Immortus says "I've lived a million lives" he means it quite literally.
Ahh ok, that makes sense then, thanks.He could transfer his mind into another body upon death, so when Immortus says "I've lived a million lives" he means it quite literally.
I imagine he just keeps a closet full of Jonathon Majorses on ice to transfer his consciousness to.
Don't know if he's smug enough to play the jerk that is Iron Man 2022This opens up the possibility that someone in the MCU can just get killed for shock value and have their multiverse variant (portrayed by the same actor) come back in a future MCU movie.
Edit: lol, imagine Disney asking Tom Holland "Hey, this will be your last Spider-Man movie. Do you want to play character xyz from the marvel multiverse?"
He could be Iron-Man in another universe...
Nah it's perfectly fine to not like the finale. It's just not nonsensical. It ties the whole show together, displays the culmination of Loki's character arc and sets up S2 and other upcoming MCU stuff.
I disagree that it's bad lore for a Loki episode. He Who Remains built the TVA - explains why he built the TVA, then offers the Loki's a chance to run the TVA. Like everything he says is in service of the Loki series. It affecting the larger MCU is a byproduct, not the main concept.I get the "Loki barely matters" concern - in a sense, the finale spends 2/3rds of its runtime setting up a very, VERY detailed trolley problem, and then throws it at the Lokis to see how they react. They both, really, act the way you'd expect. Sylvie, who wants revenge, wants to kill him. Loki, who wants power, wants to usurp him. But Loki is changed enough by his journey that his motivation is no longer just power, and he has the uphill battle of trying to convince people that THIS TIME, it really stuck, because the choice is the same either way.
But it's 100% the back seat, and objectively it's a ton of time dedicated to fleshing out the lore of that choice. In sheer mass, the lore outweighs everything else. So pound-for-pound I can see why people would call it a bad finale. Good piece of MCU content, holistically, but a bad Loki episode. Depends on how Season 2 ends up going I guess.
That being said... the Loki stuff has always felt a little shoehorned in here. It's kind of a nuts-and-gum combination. I can imagine a version that jettisons Variant Loki entirely and focuses entirely on Mobius, Sylvie, and Ravonna - just a straight up "TVA: The Series" - and it might honestly be a better show?
I'm confused by this though -- how is he immortal if he's a human? There must be at least some sort of alteration to his body and mind in order to live indefinitely and remain sane, right?
My wife and I were really disappointed with the final episode. We are not comic people (we've seen most of the main movies), so we had no idea who this new 'enemy' was. Episode was so weird; how do you go from an exciting penultimate episode were you enchant a freaking smoke dragon, to a final episode were you have an exposition dump for half the episode by some guy that seems like he's done too many lines in the bathroom? How is this guy someone that is controlling all of time, and yet he's just a normal human that can be stabbed to death? The fight between the two Lokis seemed so forced, with the female Loki basically changing behavior to fit the plot. Ugh, episode was dumb, episode 3 remains the highlight of the series.
One thing I will say is that after it was over, I told my wife I bet a lot of the people big into this stuff will have loved this finale for some reason or other, and looking here it seems I was correct. It's like this episode was made for the select few that are deep into this lore; for the rest of us it was just a mess of nonsensical exposition and odd choices.
It's all relative. Kang is crafty, smart, and can travel through time. He's not super powerful, he's just relentless.How are humans not regarded as the most dangerous creatures in the multiverse lol. Just a normal (ok genius) lil human from the 31st century, goes on to destroy most of the multiverse and command control over everything, to the point where infinity stones mean nothing to them. Like, where is galactus during all this? Is this immortus really powerful enough to kill celestials++?
I think it's great if people liked it, I thought the last episode was crap, but also to be fair 5000 votes is a select few compared to the millions who watch these shows.
for the rest of us it was just a mess of nonsensical exposition and odd choices.
Just like Vision said, "Our very strength invites challenge. Challenge incites conflict. And conflict breeds catastrophe."How are humans not regarded as the most dangerous creatures in the multiverse lol. Just a normal (ok genius) lil human from the 31st century, goes on to destroy most of the multiverse and command control over everything, to the point where infinity stones mean nothing to them. Like, where is galactus during all this? Is this immortus really powerful enough to kill celestials++?
[
I got several quotes of people telling me they didnt know anything about Kang and enjoyed it. Thats great, but Im with you. Without next day internet research, most viewers wont even know Kang's name. My wife and daughter were like "that just ended with a giant conversation and then a forced fight".
It seems like watching a whodunnit and finding out the killer was a guy not introduced until the last 15 minutes, which is kind of underwhelming. Im down for season 2, just felt like a fizzle until the shot of the conquerer statue in the library.
From a narrative standpoint, just a weird choice to make the last ep an introduction with large amounts of exposition.
I disagree that it's bad lore for a Loki episode. He Who Remains built the TVA - explains why he built the TVA, then offers the Loki's a chance to run the TVA. Like everything he says is in service of the Loki series. It affecting the larger MCU is a byproduct, not the main concept.
I feel like I watched a different show than the people that say this episode didn't focus on 'character'.
Episodes 1 through 5 were about putting Loki through a series of experiences that possibly changed him. Episode 6 was about testing those changes over and over again. PROVING that Loki had actually changed.
•Originally, Loki wanted ultimate power. He wanted this because he felt unloved his entire life, looked down upon, alone. But when he -saw- ultimate power, the TVA, he realized that it was even more alienating than a lack of it. The TVA was dry, boring, empty, soulless.
•Originally, Loki was alone. His family cared for him, but he couldn't see it. He thought his father and brother looked down on him, or were ashamed of him. And even though he did not resent his mother, he probably felt like she couldn't possibly actually love him, because he wasn't hers, and he was such a fuckup. But these people loved him, and he couldn't accept it or risk the vulnerability to love those people back. Over the course of the series, he is forced to spend time with people that understand him in some way, and this allows him to understand himself better, but also develop true and meaningful connections (Mobius and Sylvie)
In this episode, his character development is tested and confirmed TWICE. Miss Minutes offers him Asgard, Midgard, Thanos, The Infinity Gauntlet, and he turns it down. He could have had incredible power, but his newfound selflessness prevailed. Then Kang offers him the ultimate throne: dominion over ALL OF TIME AND SPACE. LITERAL KING OF SPACE. And he turns it down again! Everything he's ever wanted is right in front of him, but he begins to put the needs of others first.
And every word with Sylvie, everything they do together, every aspect of the fight, it proves that he has finally found a person he can love, and that it's not fragile, not a lie. Loki barely fights her, begs and pleads for her to stop, puts his own life on the line to spare everyone from a multiversal war but also to spare Sylvie the guilt and regret and emptiness that comes with mistakes made out of anger and resentment and loneliness.
The Loki of episode 1 would have killed Kang the second it was offered to him, slipped on the super TemPad without a second thought, and gone on a rampage throughout time and space to subjugate the Avengers. He would have been truly and utterly alone doing it, too.
Episode 6 had a lot of Kang exposition, but every single Loki and Sylvie moment was crafted with geniune purpose. Even things like the way he literally steps out of her way when they get to the front door, he knows that this is HER destiny that is approaching, and does not try to usurp the moment until the very end when he has to try and stop her to save her.
Edit: And one more thing: Several times through the show, it's noted that Loki is a survivor. Surviving is what he does. He survived falling from the bifrost, survived the encounter with Kurse, survived Ragnarok, survived Lamentis, survived the void (different versions, etc). But in episode 6, survival is the last thing on his mind. He came within a hair's breadth of being killed by Sylvie so that he could try and talk her down, dissuade her from making a mistake, so that she could be okay. The finale is selfless act after selfless act, genuine heroism from a guy for whom it seemed impossible.
The TVA matters because they spent 6 episodes building up Loki's relationship's with Sylvie - who the TVA matters a ton to, and Mobius who Loki really cares about. The TVA helps Loki grow. They throw him back to an alternate TVA where Mobius doesn't recognize him, and he's crushed by it. Like, this TV series is about Loki being involved with the TVA - all of that is important.Right, but we're sort of hitting the point where you have to wonder why the TVA matters to Loki at all? It matters to Sylvie, for sure - they're her enemy. But Loki? It's just an obstacle, something for him to try and overthrow, something that puts up a wall for him. It's an excuse for him to be thrown into these situations where he's seeing his life laid out, and seeing other versions of himself that went down different paths. The origins don't matter to him or his character arc, just that final choice. The lore dump is for the audience.
The "TVA stuff" and "Loki character stuff" are essentially two different pillars of the show, and neither really needs the other.
Ah, I was unaware. I thought it was planned as a standalone and a season 2 was just a possiblity of an extension past and already-concluded story. I thought it would be more like WandaVision and FatWS that way.
Jane becoming Thor isn't the Jane we know, but a Jane from a multiverse
Time travel technology is always god-tier broken balance. Any loser with a time portal can go back to the right moment, step on a butterfly, and prevent a god from being born.How are humans not regarded as the most dangerous creatures in the multiverse lol. Just a normal (ok genius) lil human from the 31st century, goes on to destroy most of the multiverse and command control over everything, to the point where infinity stones mean nothing to them. Like, where is galactus during all this? Is this immortus really powerful enough to kill celestials++?
Wait, people think Majors was acting poorly here?
How is that possible lmao
Technically, if someone subscribes to the late 90s-early 00s ideals that "super hero costumes can't work in movies" when the MCU's proven the can (with tweaks here and there, but not "just go grounded, black leather uniforms..."), to hold on to that belief IS being stuck in the past. The late 90s-00s were a LONG time ago (can you believe that now we are talking about the 00s and people from that era holding onto "old ways", nostalgia and looking back with "rose-tinted glasses"? Topical with this show, but time don't stand still, folks. Time moves on even of people refuse to do so.).Hey, you're just too stuck in the past to see the fashion of the future
seriously though considering how much fashion changes every decade let alone century, the comic outfit works because it's supposed to be something kinda wild and different
I noticed that too.
Each episode of What If...? is going to probably represent a different alternate timeline. Also, all the branches are likely MORE than what we see on that screen. The edges are cut off, meaning there's timelines and the past and the future of that focused part of the timeline.Based on this:
...looks like 10 movies and 15 D+ shows for Phase 4.
Whole bunch of sub-branches growing past the red lines too.
The TVA matters because they spent 6 episodes building up Loki's relationship's with Sylvie - who the TVA matters a ton to, and Mobius who Loki really cares about. The TVA helps Loki grow. They throw him back to an alternate TVA where Mobius doesn't recognize him, and he's crushed by it. Like, this TV series is about Loki being involved with the TVA - all of that is important.
Like, just because the TV show is called Loki, doesn't mean the TVA isn't important.
People don't like the character so they flame the actor.Wait, people think Majors was acting poorly here?
How is that possible lmao
How distant of a relative is Reed? Does that connection mean we're potentially getting a black Reed Richards? 👀
The whole mystery of this show is why is the TVA a thing and who did it. That's why it's different than Lamentis. It's not just a setting, it's the driving force behind everything in the show. If you don't want to know the story or reasons behind the TVA, that's fine, but to act as if it doesn't matter to this show is just silly.Yeah, it's important to people that are important to Loki, but again, to him, the main character, it's tangential.
Like, Lamentis is also important to Loki - it's an obstacle for him and Sylvie to overcome, a challenge for them to face and grow together. But do we need all the lore about it? Does it matter who is in charge of the place, or what its origins are, or what happens after they leave? No, it's just a random planet.
The TVA as a setting is important, it's the narrative hook. But the details of that setting aren't. Considering the following: it turns out the Time Keepers were really in charge, and the video he watched in Episode 1 was mostly true. They say, hey, if you kill us, it'll unravel time and chaos reigns. Very short, 5 minute conversation. Does that change anything at all about the character arcs for Loki or Sylvie?
How are humans not regarded as the most dangerous creatures in the multiverse lol. Just a normal (ok genius) lil human from the 31st century, goes on to destroy most of the multiverse and command control over everything, to the point where infinity stones mean nothing to them. Like, where is galactus during all this? Is this immortus really powerful enough to kill celestials++?
Right, but we're sort of hitting the point where you have to wonder why the TVA matters to Loki at all? It matters to Sylvie, for sure - they're her enemy. But Loki? It's just an obstacle, something for him to try and overthrow, something that puts up a wall for him. It's an excuse for him to be thrown into these situations where he's seeing his life laid out, and seeing other versions of himself that went down different paths. The origins don't matter to him or his character arc, just that final choice. The lore dump is for the audience.
The "TVA stuff" and "Loki character stuff" are essentially two different pillars of the show, and neither really needs the other.
The whole mystery of this show is why is the TVA a thing and who did it. That's why it's different than Lamentis. It's not just a setting, it's the driving force behind everything in the show. If you don't want to know the story or reasons behind the TVA, that's fine, but to act as if it doesn't matter to this show is just silly.
Oh yeah I know I meant that it would be more mechanical than just looking like his face was painted blue lolIt already is a helmet. He's always just been a normal looking guy under there, no blue face.
Kang is a human from earth, he has no powers. It's all technology.
So timelines are new universes, which is weird cause well Infinity Stones aren't meant to work in other universes but when the Avengers Time Heisted they did it from technically another universe which means the stones shouldn't have worked. I still think MCU cocked up time travel.
Oh yeah I know I meant that it would be more mechanical than just looking like his face was painted blue lol
As a casual MCU fan with no familiarity with the comics and not a particularly deep engagement with this overall storyline, I'm a bit confused about whether this conclusion is setting the groundwork for characters like Deadpool, the X-Men, the F4, and the alleged Spidey "variants" to be introduced via parallel realties - or if the fallout from this is going to be largely background noise and more limited to Loki storyline.
I mean, it seems very big. But I also could be reading too much into it.
Yeah but instead of just fucking up time travel they fucked up the multiverse in a sense.The secret to time travel is that it's impossible to actually do it well. All time travel plots fall apart under scrutiny.
they are 1000 years apart from each other so it doesn't really mean much but I bet it happens if they want to make the connection in the moviesHow distant of a relative is Reed? Does that connection mean we're potentially getting a black Reed Richards? 👀
Bad acting and "looks like a TV show" have been the typical go-tos when people who just don't like it want to sound like they have valid criticism. I see where PlanetSmasher is coming from though
This is absolutely massive. Your instincts are pretty good here. Spider-Man will be the first movie to explore this stuff most likely.As a casual MCU fan with no familiarity with the comics and not a particularly deep engagement with this overall storyline, I'm a bit confused about whether this conclusion is setting the groundwork for characters like Deadpool, the X-Men, the F4, and the alleged Spidey "variants" to be introduced via parallel realties - or if the fallout from this is going to be largely background noise and more limited to Loki storyline.
I mean, it seems very big. But I also could be reading too much into it.
I wonder If due to what's happened we'll suddenly see whomever is cast as Wolverine suddenly appear alongside Steve Rogers as a Howling Commando or if Mainline timeline remains the same and Howling Commando Logan would be part of a separate timeline?
How are humans not regarded as the most dangerous creatures in the multiverse lol. Just a normal (ok genius) lil human from the 31st century, goes on to destroy most of the multiverse and command control over everything, to the point where infinity stones mean nothing to them. Like, where is galactus during all this? Is this immortus really powerful enough to kill celestials++?
I can live with my theories being wrong, but I thought it was too hefty and honestly I didn't find it good.To be totally honest with you, the only people that don't like the finale seem to be the people that insisted for weeks that it had to be a Loki behind everything and aren't happy that they were way off base.
In the comics, humans are often considered the most dangerous species, despite not being as advanced yet. There's a whole series, Avengers Forever, devoted to it. And Kang is central to it.
Bad acting and "looks like a TV show" have been the typical go-tos when people who just don't like it want to sound like they have valid criticism. I see where PlanetSmasher is coming from though
To be totally honest with you, the only people that don't like the finale seem to be the people that insisted for weeks that it had to be a Loki behind everything and aren't happy that they were way off base.