I' was pretty similar and raised that way.
Ah okay.
Do you know how far into this stage we are and how many days each side has had yet?
It's the opposite of critical thinking.That's basically what showed up a few years ago when some quinnipiac survey showed they were "the most trusted news network". They asked a bunch of people what they trusted. Liberals were split over about 6 different networks (and marked most of them as "somewhat trust"). Conservatives just went all in on one. Same thing that fucks us over on elections too I guess.
But there is a connection, it's through Bolton and O'Brien. LolI'm chuckling at there being no connection between the Vindman brothers.
I'm chuckling at there being no connection between the Vindman brothers.
No real argument there, but then it's easy to see how they didn't even do a good job on that front. The Democrats spent 3 days calling Trump corrupt while also laying out evidence (4 days if you count opening arguments). The Trump team barely spent 4 hours on Biden after 2 days. Maybe today will be all about Biden....ugh that's going to be annoying to listen to.I mean, that does work. For everyone. If people think someone is corrupt, then
They said the same thing in 2016 with their exact same obvious smear campaign and... seems to have worked fine.
And they don't pay attention because they don't care; only if something interrupts their daily routine do they care. That's why "it's the economy, stupid." In Trump's case, most of the stuff he's done is either immoral to other people, like immigrants in cages, or it's ticking time-bombs that are too indirect, like the supreme court.To those of us paying attention it is very obvious what happened and what continues to happen. What many don't understand is that people who are on Team Trump aren't actually paying attention. They are doing whatever it is they do each day and this stuff doesn't register. Those that are paying attention though are of course morons.
The Dem house managers have used their three days. Today, day 8 , is the final day for the defense.
Between 3 8 hour days. Don't use it, you lose it.
I'm enjoying Jesse Dollarmores coverage of Trumps trial because he gives no shits. This dude is also an ex Republican and he pulls no punches in calling out Trump
Bolton reckoned Trump was in Putin's pocket.... But why is the slimy fucker putting it in his book instead of helping get the traitor out?!?!?
Bolton reckoned Trump was in Putin's pocket.... But why is the slimy fucker putting it in his book instead of helping get the traitor out?!?!?
Not quite right. Missing some important details.Did we all forget what was happening when the process was still in the house?
When Bolton was publicly saying he was ready to testify if subpoena'ed by yhe House inquiry while Trump was telling everyone to ignore them?!?
Bolton could have testified well before the book deal and because of all the fuckery it never happened
Now after this shit he may actually be pulled in to testify in the Senate which is arguably better
They wanted a judge to rule on the subpoena, which would have dragged the impeachment inquiry while they waited on a ruling (which would have probably have to go to the SCOTUS).On October 30, House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff, House Oversight Committee chair Rep. Carolyn Maloney and House Foreign Affairs Committee Rep. Eliot Engel sent a letter to Bolton's lawyers requesting Bolton's voluntary testimony at a deposition on November 7.
"Your client's failure or refusal to appear at the deposition, including at the direction or behest of the President or the White House, shall constitute evidence of obstruction of the House's impeachment inquiry and may be used as an adverse inference against the President," they wrote.
Bolton did not appear. His lawyers said he would not testify voluntarily, since Trump's White House did not permit either current or former officials to participate in the impeachment inquiry.
Bolton's lawyers said they stood ready to receive a subpoena seeking to compel his testimony. Democrats decided not to issue a subpoena, explaining that a court fight would allow the White House to delay the impeachment inquiry for months.
Bolton's lawyers said they were "dismayed" at the decision not to subpoena him. They said Bolton and former deputy national security adviser Charles Kupperman, who are represented by the same lawyers, wanted a "definitive judgment from the Judicial Branch determining their Constitutional duty in the face of conflicting demands of the Legislative and Executive Branches."
House Democrats did initially subpoena Kupperman. But they withdrew the subpoena during the resulting court case, choosing to keep the impeachment inquiry moving quickly rather than getting bogged down in court.
Not quite right. Missing some important details.
They wanted a judge to rule on the subpoena, which would have dragged the impeachment inquiry while they waited on a ruling (which would have probably have to go to the SCOTUS).
Now, it appears that they would no longer wait on a judicial ruling if subpoenaed.
When you can't attack the facts, attack the person.Either way I am seeing famed grifter Rand Paul using the talking point that Bolton is only crowing to make book money
Which is partly true minus the detail that he was willing to testify waaaay before the book was written
The deficit only matters when Dems are in power. Duh.Aren't Americans upset about the deficit? Wasn't Trump going to reduce the actual debt in his first mandate? Imagine doing this kind of deficit while the economy is raging... I guess it will be democrats fault when they will have to deal with it in the future.
Not quite right. Missing some important details.
They wanted a judge to rule on the subpoena, which would have dragged the impeachment inquiry while they waited on a ruling (which would have probably have to go to the SCOTUS).
Now, it appears that they would no longer wait on a judicial ruling if subpoenaed.
Either way I am seeing famed grifter Rand Paul using the talking point that Bolton is only crowing to make book money
Which is partly true minus the detail that he was willing to testify waaaay before the book was written
I believe they don't need to wait on it now since Roberts is right there and can make a ruling on it without going through the entire legal hell.
Am I the only one who is really weirded out by the fact that War Super Hawk John Bolton is the supposed savior of the free world here when not too terribly long ago when it was announced Trump was making him national security advisor that pretty much everyone here and in the media was suggesting Bolton was batshit insane and bloodthirsty to start WWIII with Iran?
This is the dude we're pinning our hopes on testifying? 😑
Bolton reckoned Trump was in Putin's pocket.... But why is the slimy fucker putting it in his book instead of helping get the traitor out?!?!?
They're separate issues. He is everything you say he is, but he is also a by-the-books diplomat. And his concerns about their drug deal has long been a smoking gun out of all this and his voice will have gravitas. It's hard for the GOP to call him out when he is everything they want, otherwise.Am I the only one who is really weirded out by the fact that War Super Hawk John Bolton is the supposed savior of the free world here when not too terribly long ago when it was announced Trump was making him national security advisor that pretty much everyone here and in the media was suggesting Bolton was batshit insane and bloodthirsty to start WWIII with Iran?
This is the dude we're pinning our hopes on testifying? 😑
WASHINGTON — The effort to pressure Ukraine for political help provoked a heated confrontation inside the White House last summer that so alarmed John R. Bolton, then the national security adviser, that he told an aide to alert White House lawyers, House investigators were told on Monday.
Mr. Bolton got into a tense exchange on July 10 with Gordon D. Sondland, the Trump donor turned ambassador to the European Union, who was working with Rudolph W. Giuliani, the president's personal lawyer, to press Ukraine to investigate Democrats, according to three people who heard the testimony.
The aide, Fiona Hill, testified that Mr. Bolton told her to notify the chief lawyer for the National Security Council about a rogue effort by Mr. Sondland, Mr. Giuliani and Mick Mulvaney, the acting White House chief of staff, according to the people familiar with the testimony.
"I am not part of whatever drug deal Sondland and Mulvaney are cooking up," Mr. Bolton, a Yale-trained lawyer, told Ms. Hill to tell White House lawyers, according to two people at the deposition. (Another person in the room initially said Mr. Bolton referred to Mr. Giuliani and Mr. Mulvaney, but two others said he cited Mr. Sondland.)
I can't imagine Republicans publicly shitting all over Bolton is the best idea if he eventually has to testify.
I can't imagine Republicans publicly shitting all over Bolton is the best idea if he eventually has to testify.
They should be charging Bolton as a accomplice
I'm very sceptical of what Bolton has. Partly because every time we get one of these "juicy expose from ex-insider writing a book" it's either bullshit or utterly insignificant within a week or two.
But thinking it through, I did not view Bolton as a rational, trustworthy person before, during or after he was in the White House. Dude thought Libya was a good model for what the US should do to North Korea. Him getting fired and not getting his sexy delicious Iran war also brings his motivations into question. So this being leaked just in time to make the argument for extra witnesses more compelling at a stage where it looks like realistically, Trump could be quickly acquitted is suspicious to me. I suspect it is part of the plan to get the witnesses argument out there because for the Democrats the best case scenario is that they get more compelling evidence from him. If not, the process in the Senate will be stretched out as negotiations and depositions are made. Extending the process is bad for Trump. Lastly, I highly doubt that whatever Bolton has will move the needle when it comes down to the actual vote. So yeah I really think that the Democrats are not expecting to win the case their strategy is to extend bad PR for Trump with 2020 in mind.
They're separate issues. He is everything you say he is, but he is also a by-the-books diplomat. And his concerns about their drug deal has long been a smoking gun out of all this and his voice will have gravitas. It's hard for the GOP to call him out when he is everything they want, otherwise.
And this is hardly coming out of nowhere. Dude was in on Ukraine from the start and recused himself immediately.
This is from October.
None of this is new news. Just his verification of what the Times and others have already reported.
If they can get him as a witness, they need to do it.
I am. The deficit is up 74% in 3 years since Obama's last year. This is what Trump said about the deficit in 2016, which is now over $23TN. So-called "fiscal conservatives" my ass, and the military is so over-funded Trump can pull billions from it to pay for another campaign promise he failed to get funded through Congress, and the "support the troops" party is fine with it.Aren't Americans upset about the deficit? Wasn't Trump going to reduce the actual debt in his first mandate? Imagine doing this kind of deficit while the economy is raging... I guess it will be democrats fault when they will have to deal with it in the future.
Blegh. Came into work and had to hear my coworker regurgitate Trump's defense. I had to take him through why what Obama said to Putin was in no way comparable, how Biden's statement about withholding aid wasn't comparable, how this isn't something every president does. He clearly had no idea what "investigating the 2016 election" was actually about and thought it related to Biden's "corruption".
It's just so exhausting and so much is just whataboutism nonsense.
Dude's an immigrant too. I have some terrible news for him.
The interests align, he wants American supremacy in the world and Trump is actively ceding it to other nations.Am I the only one who is really weirded out by the fact that War Super Hawk John Bolton is the supposed savior of the free world here when not too terribly long ago when it was announced Trump was making him national security advisor that pretty much everyone here and in the media was suggesting Bolton was batshit insane and bloodthirsty to start WWIII with Iran?
This is the dude we're pinning our hopes on testifying? 😑
I'm enjoying Jesse Dollarmores coverage of Trumps trial because he gives no shits. This dude is also an ex Republican and he pulls no punches in calling out Trump
Blegh. Came into work and had to hear my coworker regurgitate Trump's defense. I had to take him through why what Obama said to Putin was in no way comparable, how Biden's statement about withholding aid wasn't comparable, how this isn't something every president does. He clearly had no idea what "investigating the 2016 election" was actually about and thought it related to Biden's "corruption".
It's just so exhausting and so much is just whataboutism nonsense.
I'm enjoying Jesse Dollarmores coverage of Trumps trial because he gives no shits. This dude is also an ex Republican and he pulls no punches in calling out Trump
I can't imagine Republicans publicly shitting all over Bolton is the best idea if he eventually has to testify.
I don't even understand the argument. I came in the middle and it just sounds like Obama saying he can better work with Putin when not dealing with an election. How is that weird or demanding interference or comparable to withholding congressionally approved aid?I see conservatives cite the bolded often, but did anything even...come out of that?At the very least, I can't imagine anything as egregious as the Comey fallout. (Including sharing classified info with Russian officials within the Oval Office.)