Speevy what are you proposing? rounding up the anti-vaxxers on a bus for forced injections? loony, as loony as they are
Either that or a rocket ship.
Speevy what are you proposing? rounding up the anti-vaxxers on a bus for forced injections? loony, as loony as they are
where's the rocket going?
Your response to my statement that some European countries have mandated vaccines is asserting that some didn't? Here is an overview of the vaccination schedule per EU country:
referring to it as a "hastily developed medical product" is disinformation, when it is clearly going to be subjected to all the regulatory approvals that any vaccine is in any nation where it's deployed
I don't think governments should force it on people, but I think it should affect people's ability to do things like travel and work in some fields (just like it currently works for a number of vaccines in healthcare for instance). Not just let them "take the risk" - because it's not just themselves they're putting at risk. That's the whole point.
I have seen interviews with people who work on vacancies warning about companies rushing to get vaccines out. Don't pretend as if it isn't a valid concern and that it puts people into the antivaxer group.
He had a TB vaccine already, no aids test.Did he have to get an AIDS test and a chest X-ray for TB?
I assume they don't do that if the person is below a certain age.
Your response to my statement that some European countries have mandated vaccines is asserting that some didn't? Here is an overview of the vaccination schedule per EU country:
Vaccine Scheduler | ECDC
Giving insight in the vaccine schedules in all countries of the EU, provided by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC).vaccine-schedule.ecdc.europa.eu
And of course that doesn't take into account countries where vaccines aren't mandatory, but enough people are in any case vaccinated because the vaccination is done through schools. Like I'm quite sure I only managed to avoid getting them from the school doctors by having proof that I got them from my personal GP.
The last part is exactly why everybody else should be required to take the vaccine.You're free to not take it. But then if you set foot outside your house, get charged for being a biohazard. (People that can't medically take the vaccine are excluded).
Speevy what are you proposing? rounding up the anti-vaxxers on a bus for forced injections? loony, as loony as they are
Oh, fair enough, I misinterpreted that point. And full agreement on forcing vaccine creation, although I would broaden that out to a long-proposed (I know Elizabeth Warren talked about it, but it predates her) idea of having government manufacturing capacity for generic, necessary medications. Government-produced insulin, for instance, could be made incredibly inexpensively as well as renew research into modern antibiotics, antivirals, and vaccines that have fallen by the wayside in the push for lifestyle drugs in recent decades.
Imagine opting to put yourself and others at risk then call it a violation of your rights to have s forced vaccination.Living in a world where something like this is enforced would be hellish, horror movie type stuff.
That's not how it works. Letting stupid people get sick puts at risk people that can't take a vaccine for medical reasons. Herd Immunity requires forcing as many people as possible to take the vaccine.
The stupid people will get other people infected and weaken herd immunity
Has it? We haven't even use the smallpox vaccine on the population in the past 37 years.It's been enforced in America without much of an issue for over 100 years.
I don't like being put to sleep either, the idea of it freaks me out. Too similar to what I think dying would be like.Imagine opting to put yourself and others at risk then call it a violation of your rights to have s forced vaccination.
you can prob have one while unconscious
It's pretty much like going to sleep. You can even take gas and air which just makes you a bit light headed and it's all over within seconds.I don't like being put to sleep either, the idea of it freaks me out. Too similar to what I think dying would be like.
I mean, ask for a xanax or to be blindfolded, worst come to worst.
Has it? We haven't even use the smallpox vaccine on the population in the past 37 years.
I'm still wondering how are they are going to distribute it. I'm guessing they'll start from oldest to youngest.
.Yes because there are going to be some people who can't take the vaccine for legitimate medical reasons and those people would wind up being at risk because of the morons who refuse to take it.
I'm still wondering how are they are going to distribute it. I'm guessing they'll start from oldest to youngest.
Thanks, I'm aware of the facts. How exactly do you see mandatory vaccination of adults working out post in post-2020 America?Because smallpox was declared eliminated in 1980 with the last cases occurring in America in the 40's. That's the end goal for any vaccine, to use it to element the disease entirely.
Not necessarily, school children, for instance, should be prioritized. Because schools are generally a hotbed for disease transmission and because preexisting school infrastructure will make it easier. You need to get the biggest chunks of the population vaccinated as quickly as possible. Doing that will protect at risk groups more than giving them the vaccine directly.
I agree.actually younger people are bigger spreaders so it depends on how prevalent the virus is at that time
Thanks, I'm aware of the facts. How exactly do you see mandatory vaccination of adults working out post in post-2020 America?
A law being on the books is different than it being "enforced" for 100 years. Correct me if I'm wrong, but no one's been vaccinated under that law for at least 37 years.I was super confused by your question, so I stuck with the basics.
I am not sure how the cessation of the smallpox vaccine relates to the fact that state-issued, mandatory vaccinations have been the understood law of the land for over 100 years. Why would one of the greatest examples of the efficacy of mandatory vaccine programs be a piece of evidence against mandatory vaccination programs?
A law being on the books is different than it being "enforced" for 100 years. Correct me if I'm wrong, but no one's been vaccinated under that law for at least 37 years.
We're not in the 70s anymore. Sure, you start the US's largest free vaccination programme, roll it out across the country. What do you do with the people who refuse in a country sitting on almost 400 million guns?