• Light/Dark
  • Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

FIFA Women's World Cup 2019 || 7 June – 7 July, France

Reader mode
Heshinsi

Heshinsi

Member
Oct 25, 2017
16,094
giphy.gif
 
KHarvey16

KHarvey16

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
9,193
Osa15 said:
The Netherland player was concerned about the ball and didn't deliberately hit the USA player. A foul should be given only if the Netherlands player was playing in a dangerous manner. In this instance, the Netherland player was unaware of the player behind so, so she could not have had any dangerous intent.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Ahahahahahahaha
 
808s & Villainy

808s & Villainy

Member
Oct 27, 2017
42,722
Osa15 said:
The Netherland player was concerned about the ball and didn't deliberately hit the USA player. A foul should be given only if the Netherlands player was playing in a dangerous manner. In this instance, the Netherland player was unaware of the player behind so, so she could not have had any dangerous intent.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
That's not really how it works though
 
grang

grang

Member
Nov 13, 2017
10,087
Osa15 said:
The Netherland player was concerned about the ball and didn't deliberately hit the USA player. A foul should be given only if the Netherlands player was playing in a dangerous manner. In this instance, the Netherland player was unaware of the player behind so, so she could not have had any dangerous intent.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Does not have to be intentional to be called a foul. Key words are careless or reckless. It shouldn't have been a red certainly, and it wasn't, but it was correctly called as a foul and it was inside the penalty box. I know it's not what you wanted to happen, but that doesn't make it the wrong call.
 
OP
OP
Peru

Peru

Member
Oct 26, 2017
6,138
Osa15 said:
The Netherland player was concerned about the ball and didn't deliberately hit the USA player. A foul should be given only if the Netherlands player was playing in a dangerous manner. In this instance, the Netherland player was unaware of the player behind her, so she could not have had any dangerous intent. The rules is to ancient. If they want to punish a player who had no dangerous intent in winning the ball, at least it should be an in direct freekick in the box.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

You don't know the rules then, ok
 

Deleted member 36054

Banned
Dec 12, 2017
4,652
Osa15 said:
The Netherland player was concerned about the ball and didn't deliberately hit the USA player. A foul should be given only if the Netherlands player was playing in a dangerous manner. In this instance, the Netherland player was unaware of the player behind so, so she could not have had any dangerous intent.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
You couldn't be more wrong that's a foul. Intent is the difference between a yellow card and a red card. She nade contact with her shoulder studs up in the box. That's a foul Everytime dude.
 
Reader mode
You must log in or register to reply here.