Greedy Disney is back too! Sorry, I just wanted to use the arrogant Sony meme :vDisney just asked for 10 times the stake they're getting now lol.
Un-fucking-believable. Feige was just talking about Spider-Man 3 weeks ago so this must have only just collapsed. There's still time to salvage it.
Amazing Spider-Man 2 despite relative fatigue and middling impressions still made $700 million world wide. A Venom solo movie just made $800 million world wide. The property is definitely elevated being associated with the MCU, but it would be far from dead.
My first takeaway as well. Seems like a decision with the potential to disrupt long term plans for Spidey in the MCU as much as his standalone films and crossover aspects, and yet he's been set up front and center all the same.Why would you make Spider-Man such a significant part of the universe in Far From Home, when you didn't have assurances that he would be sticking around? That, to me, is the first gross sign of mismanagement from Marvel Studios? What the fuck?
that could happen. they could just give the license to anyone, but we dont know the current deal. marvel games is not the mcu and maybe insomniac/sony are contracted to do a trilogy.Disney is gonna take the Spidey license away from Insomniac now.
So what happens to both the MCU and the current Spidey run? Does the MCU have to just write Spiderman out and does the next Holland movie just have to not mention all of the MCU stuff that's in it?
That was a Sony idea you know...
Disney just asked for 10 times the stake they're getting now lol.
How dumb is Sony?
Literally the worst possible thing they could do
If this messes with story continuity that is going to seriously suck.
So I guess they'll just pretend Tony Stark never existed. Outside of time travel, how do you do that? The MCU aspect is so ingrained with Spiderman now.
I'm guessing reboot?
On ebay sometimes you just don't respond to offers when someone is trying to rip you off
well that blows i wonder how long tom sticks around after his contract is up now that hes not apart of the mcu
Disney is gonna take the Spidey license away from Insomniac now.
Giving up 50% of the revenue from one of their most valuable movie properties would be dumb. I get people want their comics movie connected movie universes at any and all costs, but these are billion dollar companies making decisions based solely on money, not on what will make for cool movies. Sony turning down a 50% split might suck for you as a fan, but it's absolutely not "dumb".
You mean Disney.
Never watched the Amazing movie, but the Raimi films were great and I loved Venom. The MCU was lame and played out, so I'm glad Spider-man gets to go back to being his own thing.
Sony to license DC's Sideways?Disney is gonna take the Spidey license away from Insomniac now.
it also had anywhere between 2 to 300 mill budgetAmazing Spider-Man 2 despite relative fatigue and middling impressions still made $700 million world wide. A Venom solo movie just made $800 million world wide. The property is definitely elevated being associated with the MCU, but it would be far from dead.
The entire point of this discussion where things broke down was about them co-financing the films. The problem is that Disney wanted to split it 50-50 and Sony wanted to go 95-5.
So you expect Spider-Man to be in the MCU, and Feige not having any say in it. it doesn't work that way.
So Sony wanted to maintain the same terms but Marvel wanted 50% of the gross...