His polling improved in FL post-comments. SC has little to do with that. Demographics are completely different there.Cuba is now Bernie Sander's Jeremy Corbyn moment, confirmed
doubling down at the debate made it worse
His polling improved in FL post-comments. SC has little to do with that. Demographics are completely different there.Cuba is now Bernie Sander's Jeremy Corbyn moment, confirmed
doubling down at the debate made it worse
I mean it's pretty easy when the correct takes are so damn obviousBecause I think there is a consensus on this being our next big divide to stick a wedge into. Establishment vs new-gen democrats. So you'll see conservative opponents pretending to be on Sanders's side to further drive the division.
We are getting played so damn hard right now.
You do realize the Democratic electorate in South Carolina is largely African-American, right?South Carolina is extremely conservative, so I could buy the polls honestly. Biden is Republican-lite so a lot of white people will be flocking to him regardless of what he actually says.
It's why someone like Lindsey Graham constantly keeps getting reelected and is doing well now here in the poll despite being tied to Trump.
Imma gonna do my part regardless of what the polls say.
If we're at a point where parachuting someone in seems reasonable we've already lost, tbh.That NYT article is hilarious. I can't even imagine how many states Chris Coons would lose if they parachute him in.
Bloomberg/Steyer voters were/are mostly "undecideds" in disguise is one theory I've seen floated that seems like it has some truth to it.I wonder why there's such a huge jump in the polls. What changed—or what were the earlier polls missing?
South Carolina is extremely conservative, so I could buy the polls honestly. Biden is Republican-lite so a lot of white people will be flocking to him regardless of what he actually says.
It's why someone like Lindsey Graham constantly keeps getting reelected and is doing well now here in the poll despite being tied to Trump.
Imma gonna do my part regardless of what the polls say.
I mean it's pretty easy when the correct takes are so damn obvious
Because I think there is a consensus on this being our next big divide to stick a wedge into. Establishment vs new-gen democrats. So you'll see conservative opponents pretending to be on Sanders's side to further drive the division.
We are getting played so damn hard right now.
Absolutely. They really weren't a fan overall. I didn't hear a lot of positivity behind her at all.
That said. Trump had less votes than Romney in MN 2016. It was just the turnout for Hilary was bad.
Bloomberg/Steyer voters were/are mostly "undecideds" in disguise is one theory I've seen floated that seems like it has some truth to it.
I'm confused why so many people are worried about Sanders losing SC.
That was always going to be a hard state for him. Don't you remember the 2016 primary?
it's up to establishment dems to wake up to the reality of the situation and get in the game instead of concern trolling about cubaIt's textbook divide and conquer. It's up to both sides of the democratic party to try and mitigate this.
You do realize the Democratic electorate in South Carolina is largely African-American, right?
Apparently not.You understand the reason Biden is booming in this poll are older black voters, and not white voters, right?
Cause it doesn't sound like you understand at all the driving dynamics of South Carolina in regards to the Democratic voting demographic.
Galaxy brain: DNC steals the nom from Bernie, some shitty non-Bernie candidate somehow gets a narrow win, AND Trump refuses to step down."The DNC will steal the election" is right up there with "Trump will not hand over the reins of government" in terms of fearmongering.
The issue is the momentum going into STI'm confused why so many people are worried about Sanders losing SC.
That was always going to be a hard state for him. Don't you remember the 2016 primary?
Margins, my friends. If Sanders held Biden to a close win it would be impressive. If Biden blew Sanders out he'd be in trouble. And there are plenty of results that fall between those two.I'm confused why so many people are worried about Sanders losing SC.
That was always going to be a hard state for him. Don't you remember the 2016 primary?
Galaxy brain: DNC steals the nom from Bernie, some shitty non-Bernie candidate somehow gets a narrow win, AND Trump refuses to step down.
In their minds they had envisioned Sanders winning all 50 states and being coronated as the rightful reshaper of the Democratic party that everyone would rally behind and ride to victory in November. Him getting blown out by some 40+ points on Saturday to Biden doesn't jive with that fantasy.I'm confused why so many people are worried about Sanders losing SC.
That was always going to be a hard state for him. Don't you remember the 2016 primary?
Bernie lost South Carolina 26/74 against Hillary. This is directly related to Bernie only winning 25% of the black vote nationwide in 2016.Apparently not.
I admit I'm green when it comes to stuff like that. I haven't looked at polling data demographics and I'm happy to learn though.
Does Bernie being unpopular in SC mean that he'll lose to Trump there if he's the nominee?
I'm confused why so many people are worried about Sanders losing SC.
That was always going to be a hard state for him. Don't you remember the 2016 primary?
Coons as the nominee would be so funny I would actually want to see itThat NYT article is hilarious. I can't even imagine how many states Chris Coons would lose if they parachute him in.
Trump would win in SC regardlessDoes Bernie being unpopular in SC mean that he'll lose to Trump there if he's the nominee?
Any Dem will lose SC in the general because it's SC.Does Bernie being unpopular in SC mean that he'll lose to Trump there if he's the nominee?
I mean, there's been a few hopeful polls that... are almost definitely wrong.
In their minds they had envisioned Sanders winning all 50 states and being coronated as the rightful reshaper of the Democratic party that everyone would rally behind and ride to victory in November. Him getting blown out by some 40+ points on Saturday to Biden doesn't jive with that fantasy.
this pisses me right the fk off.
Colbert, I trusted you.
I thought he was smarter than this.
and how in the world is Chris Christie like... precisely on point with every single thing he says in this interview?!?
Biden is not Republican-lite, and his support isn't Republican-lite in SC.
What we've seen with the "just call him the winner and get behind him already!" stuff has seemed like insecurity much more than overconfidence.I'm really fearful of Bernie losing the primary mostly because I think it's an instant win for trump. The backlash will be worse than 2016 because of everyone feeling over confident.
this pisses me right the fk off.
Colbert, I trusted you.
I thought he was smarter than this.
and how in the world is Chris Christie like... precisely on point with every single thing he says in this interview?!?
edit: I should add, at least Seth Meyers has been covering Bernie honestly - I've switched to watching him mostly now anyway.
This isn't Republican-lite? RE: Arguing for "freezing" (aka not increasing costs with inflation aka cutting) social safety nets.
this is assuming Biden has the organization to translate his momentum outside of the south. There is just not that much time between the primary results and ST.There's a big difference between a 5% win and a 20% win. The latter dramatically increases the odds of a contested convention.
The issue is a +20% win potentially puts Biden back on track and he could win the whole thing outright. Sanders hasn't had big margins in the other states and South Carolina is worth quite a few delegates. His whole lead could potentially get erased. Really hoping it doesn't, but I get why people are nervous about the state.There's a big difference between a 5% win and a 20% win. The latter dramatically increases the odds of a contested convention.
I made that case earlier and I stand by it. Biden and Bloomberg cancelling each other out on Super Tuesday is a good thing for Sanders. You don't want all of that establishment vote coalescing behind Bloomberg. Biden winning big in South Carolina is a good thing. Additionally, Biden displacing Bloomberg and Sanders still persevering by a wide margin would also bode well in the long run for consolidating Democratic support behind a clear front-runner.Someone else made the case but honestly the best thing for Bernie would be a Biden surge such that it because a de facto two way race that he convincingly wins in the end after the others drop out. Then there's zero question about a mandate and whether he should be the nominee. The split ticket's an easier win but it's a win with an asterisk depending on where he lands.
we've never seen this before either. supporters of a democratic candidate asking for people they don't support to drop out. it's unheard of.What we've seen with the "just call him the winner and get behind him already!" stuff has seemed like insecurity much more than overconfidence.
Biden is winning because SC's large black population seems to like him and they're almost all registered D.South Carolina is extremely conservative, so I could buy the polls honestly. Biden is Republican-lite so a lot of white people will be flocking to him regardless of what he actually says.
It's why someone like Lindsey Graham constantly keeps getting reelected and is doing well now here in the poll despite being tied to Trump.
Imma gonna do my part regardless of what the polls say.
You do realize the Democratic electorate in South Carolina is largely African-American, right?
Bernie beating Trump in 4 out of 5 swing states, the other being a tie.