hes the giant rat that makes all of the rules
hes the giant rat that makes all of the rules
Every Bush-Era, neo-con, Never Trump Republican is parading around the editorial pages of the major newspapers today calling on Obama to save their party.
i thought it was because of all the pics of him eating
Yeah better not to even botherDo people honestly believe that's going to actually work in any meaningful way?
I wonder if Pete is wondering why his strategy of going after one demographic that would only help him win the least populous states is not working
Do people honestly believe that's going to actually work in any meaningful way?
Pete has made the Hillary deplorables error and looks set to double down on it at the next debate
rats are cuter at least
Guys, just let Pete fade into oblivion as he takes a job consulting or being a lobbyist. Or hell, being on MSNBC. They like to hire centrists that lost elections.
I mean she was telling the truth tho.It kills me when people whine about Bernie not appealing to the moderates by targeting the establishment yet still bat for Clinton and her deplorables comment because she was telling the truth.
Same reason they defended Clinton when she said nobody likes Bernie ("she's just telling the truth!," "she's in 'no fucks given' mode!," but clutched their pearls when Tlaib booed Clinton. These people aren't operating in good faith.The point is to compromise when we get there, not compromise from the start and then compromise again when we get there.
It kills me when people whine about Bernie not appealing to the moderates by targeting the establishment yet still bat for Clinton and her deplorables comment because she was telling the truth.
And they are still slow on reporting votes, despite so many of them being basic cards.If around 90k voted in early voting, seems like very few actually turned out to caucus
This for Nevada? I don't think 90k did early voting. I thought that number was around 70k - it was 2/3 of the total 2016 turnout. It definitely surpassed 2016 turnout. Question is how close it got to 2008.If around 90k voted in early voting, seems like very few actually turned out to caucus
We make nowhere near the amount in the example being discussed, but we have just about the same quality of health care, and I have the same concern about losing what we have for the uncertain promise of M4A. You are understating the risk in your comment above.That is a very privileged response. He's not okay with his son maybe, possibly receiving slightly less care (which he can compensate for, considering his high income) but is perfectly fine with the poors or the unemployed dying?
He has, but it's dependent on what the goal of the town hall is for. For example, here is one for this exact problem. Just watch at 44 min in of people's pain.Third, Bernie does need to do a better job at talking about what M4A means totally, what coverage it has, etc. The last 4 years or so, he has mostly just been making the moral side of the case, and listing off numbers.
People call Pete a rat and Warren a snake because they are into vore.
That's... kinda the point. Not to mention your idea of doubling is still a 56-43 finish.You're never going to get someone from WV who isn't pro-second amendment. We kinda have a history of actually having to kill coal barons.
I mean, he describes himself as pro-life and didn't give a pro-choice spiel like that until he ran for president. And he voted for someone for President who wasn't pro-choice.The pro life thing isn't accurate either, as he's rallied for WV Free, and:
Richard Ojeda Comes Out Swinging on Abortion Rights
2020 presidential candidate Richard Ojeda: “Rich women have always had access to the care that they want or need and they always will.”theintercept.com
He's also since renounced Trump after admitting that he was wrong about the outsider rhetoric.
Ojeda has stated "I don't think I've ever voted for a Democrat for president" and supported Donald Trump in 2016.[19][20] He told Politico that he voted for Trump because he initially believed Trump would do something for West Virginians. By 2018, he expressed regret for voting for Trump, saying that "he hasn't done shit" and he is "taking care of the daggone people he's supposed to be getting rid of".[2] Ojeda said he supported Bernie Sanders in the 2016 Democratic primary.[21]
Ojeda said he supported Bernie Sanders, another populist, in the 2016 presidential race but supported President Donald Trump in the general because Trump was talking about coal.
Economists, including researchers at WVU's School of Business and Economic Research, continue to predict long-term declines in that industry, and they say slight recent gains in metallurgical coal, used to make steel, weren't due to rolling back climate change policy.
Don't kinkshame.People call Pete a rat and Warren a snake because they are into vore.
Almost 90% of the Nevada vote in, Bernie holding at 47%
Election News | AP Election Results
AP News is your trusted source for election news and results. Read on for the latest U.S. and international election updates.elections.ap.org
He is a pest that's impossible to get rid of.While I actually do see a resemblance with Pete eating like a rat it's still a little disconcerting that people compare him to vermin idk
Huhwhen Bloomberg brought up that Bernie owns a copy of Fire Emblem Three Houses
One thing that I just thought of. If Medicare for all is passed, do people expect the money from employer based insurance to go to the employees or the employer will just keep it for greater profits? I can definitely see people's salaries staying the same, but with larger taxes, thus a greater financial burden. I feel like part of the law must mandate that employers can't keep the extra profits from not paying for insurance.
Bernie owns three houses is the joke.
One thing that I just thought of. If Medicare for all is passed, do people expect the money from employer based insurance to go to the employees or the employer will just keep it for greater profits? I can definitely see people's salaries staying the same, but with larger taxes, thus a greater financial burden. I feel like part of the law must mandate that employers can't keep the extra profits from not paying for insurance.
Ah yes, I was mixing up the turnout numbersThis for Nevada? I don't think 90k did early voting. I thought that number was around 70k - it was 2/3 of the total 2016 turnout. It definitely surpassed 2016 turnout. Question is how close it got to 2008.
I wish I could trust Bernie not to put this guy in an important cabinet position.Guys, just let Pete fade into oblivion as he takes a job consulting or being a lobbyist. Or hell, being on MSNBC. They like to hire centrists that lost elections.
I wish I could trust Bernie not to put this guy in an important cabinet position.
It hopefully encourages more mobility in the workforce rather than hold workers ransom because of work providing insurance plans.
Its why the Nevada union broke for Bernie, their work plans suck or just aren't that great and tether them down.
Do people honestly believe that's going to actually work in any meaningful way?
So has anyone posted the most important political endorsement of all?
Just look at what medicare currently covers and what your insurance plan provides on top of what is covered by medicare. Include vision and dental (a la part C). And find out what isn't being covered. The whole point of government coverage is to cast the widest net. If there are some services that your insurance covers which aren't covered by M4A, you're almost guaranteed to be able to buy supplemental insurance plans, which even exist in countries that also have socialized medicine so obviously insurance companies aren't going bankrupt anytime soon.We make nowhere near the amount in the example being discussed, but we have just about the same quality of health care, and I have the same concern about losing what we have for the uncertain promise of M4A. You are understating the risk in your comment above.
And this is the same concern shared by many lower income / working class union members who have health insurance through the efforts of their union.
I only wish he had done the whole thing in his terrible British accent from Mary Poppins.
I don't think so. Folks will have the ability to walk away from bad work more easily.
However, private health insurance is about 5% of GDP. Anticipate a lot of people to lose dumb bureaucratic jobs and complain about it. This would be a massive economic shift.
Also anticipate a political backlash that makes 2010 look polite.
(Assuming Medicare For All passes, which is a low likelihood).
Employers being shady is something to watch out for, but for most people the ammt they're paying into insurance is opt in, and already part of their salary (a chunk of each paycheck going to the insurance). So yes their "salary" would stay the same, but they're not paying that insurance money every paycheck. For employers to "keep" that money, they would literally have to pay cut everyone that was on the group insurance.One thing that I just thought of. If Medicare for all is passed, do people expect the money from employer based insurance to go to the employees or the employer will just keep it for greater profits? I can definitely see people's salaries staying the same, but with larger taxes, thus a greater financial burden. I feel like part of the law must mandate that employers can't keep the extra profits from not paying for insurance.
In case it hasn't been posted yet:
I'm very happy to hear his stance on Palestinian Justice hasn't wavered.
While I actually do see a resemblance with Pete eating like a rat it's still a little disconcerting that people compare him to vermin idk
I still don't understand how that's going to translate into actual votes towards his agenda.
Employers being shady is something to watch out for, but for most people the ammt they're paying into insurance is opt in, and already part of their salary (a chunk of each paycheck going to the insurance). So yes their "salary" would stay the same, but they're not paying that insurance money every paycheck. For employers to "keep" that money, they would literally have to pay cut everyone that was on the group insurance.
It won't.I still don't understand how that's going to translate into actual votes towards his agenda.