To be honest GDQ shouldn't ban anyone without proof. Does she have? Or only her word?
I'm not talking about this case but in general. So any woman can just accuse a man and get him banned of the event without proof?
oh boy here we go.......
To be honest GDQ shouldn't ban anyone without proof. Does she have? Or only her word?
I'm not talking about this case but in general. So any woman can just accuse a man and get him banned of the event without proof?
I'm talking in general, not this specific case because the guy is doing everything wrong. In this case he's clearly guilty.Do you see the very personal and inappropriate screenshots he's tweeting out painting him to be the nice guy trope to a tee?
Read his fucking twitter. He's openly admitting that he cancelled her return ticket specifically because she changed her mind on sleepping with him.To be honest GDQ shouldn't ban anyone without proof. Does she have? Or only her word?
I'm not talking about this case but in general. So any woman can just accuse a man and get him banned of the event without proof?
To be honest GDQ shouldn't ban anyone without proof. Does she have? Or only her word?
I'm not talking about this case but in general. So any woman can just accuse a man and get him banned of the event without proof?
I'm talking in general, not this specific case because the guy is doing everything wrong.
Because it's not the first time something like this happens and it's not like you bring a camcorder with you to this kind of situations. What kind of proof could you even provide?
LOL I said from the very first post I made that this is in general. And applies for this kind of incidents too. Why you get so aggressive when you don't seem to even understand my first post?I hate when people barge into topics like these, ask a stupid question, and then when challenged on it fall back to "I'm not speaking specifically to this case, just in general"
If this specific incident doesn't apply to your question why are you asking it in this thread?
It's public now though. And yes poor girl. She shouldn't be subject to this going public. I'm just cringing at the things he's saying to flirt with her. It's so awkward. The fact he's shared this thinking it looks good says it all.Why? It's a private conversation.
This is awful, why are you all reading this shit? Poor girl.
You really don't want to bring that debate in here. You really, really don't.I'm talking in general, not this specific case because the guy is doing everything wrong.
Because it's not the first time something like this happens and it's not like you bring a camcorder with you to this kind of situations. What kind of proof could you even provide?
How can an event organizer judge you based on limited proof? What is the minimum amount to be considered guilty?
I'm talking in general, not this specific case because the guy is doing everything wrong. In this case he's clearly guilty.
But this is not the first time something like this happens and it's not like you bring a camcorder with you to this kind of situations. What kind of proof could you even provide if something like this happenes to you?
How can an event organizer judge you based on limited proof? What is the minimum amount to be considered guilty?
I'm saying this because this kind of situations seem very difficult to deal with so I would like to know more what's the usual handling process.
Can I ask you why you've specifically chosen a thread in where this dude is clearly guilty as the place to discuss whether GDQ bans other people fairly or not?I'm talking in general, not this specific case because the guy is doing everything wrong. In this case he's clearly guilty.
But this is not the first time something like this happens and it's not like you bring a camcorder with you to this kind of situations. What kind of proof could you even provide if something like this happenes to you?
How can an event organizer judge you based on limited proof? What is the minimum amount to be considered guilty?
LOL I said from the very first post I made that this is in general. And applies for this kind of incidents too. Why you get so aggressive when you don't seem to even understand my first post?
Read his fucking twitter. He's openly admitting that he cancelled her return ticket specifically because she changed her mind on sleepping with him.
If "you don't get to return home unless you sleep with me" isn't sexual harrassment I don't know what is
This isn't a court of law. As a private event, the AGDQ organizers are free to ban whoever they want for whatever reason they want. (as long as it isn't because the recipient is a protected class).How can an event organizer judge you based on limited proof? What is the minimum amount to be considered guilty?
Read his fucking twitter. He's openly admitting that he cancelled her return ticket specifically because she changed her mind on sleepping with him.
If "you don't get to return home unless you sleep with me" isn't sexual harrassment I don't know what is
What narrative? I admit I may have redacted my original post in a bad manner. I think explained it better on my post on this page. I just want to know how this situations are normally handled.Why are you creating a straw man to push a narrative that you don't even know exists? First you ask if GDQ has the evidence and then pivot to "generally speaking can women just accuse men and get them banned?"
Read his fucking twitter. He's openly admitting that he cancelled her return ticket specifically because she changed her mind on sleepping with him.
If "you don't get to return home unless you sleep with me" isn't sexual harrassment I don't know what is
If you have even the slightest respect for the girl you will take this discussion to a different thread right nowWhat narrative? I admit I may have redacted my original post in a bad manner. I think explained it better on my post on this page. I just want to know how this situations are normally handled.
Read his fucking twitter. He's openly admitting that he cancelled her return ticket specifically because she changed her mind on sleepping with him.
If "you don't get to return home unless you sleep with me" isn't sexual harrassment I don't know what is
Do I really have to explain the concept of consent? Screw your victim blamingThen again, she put herself in that situation by intitiating the DTF convo and accepting the trip.
It doesn't seem as one dimensional as many want to make it seem.
Are you serious right now?Then again, she put herself in that situation by intitiating the DTF convo and accepting the trip.
It doesn't seem as one dimensional as many want to make it seem.
"How dare you make me feel awkward and uncomfortable by sleeping on the floor."Read his fucking twitter. He's openly admitting that he cancelled her return ticket specifically because she changed her mind on sleepping with him.
If "you don't get to return home unless you sleep with me" isn't sexual harrassment I don't know what is
That's not an excuse to read it.
He cancelled the ticked long after she presumably said no. I don't imagine he threatened her on the spot, at least.If "you don't get to return home unless you sleep with me" isn't sexual harrassment I don't know what is
Fuck off with this. Having a conversation where you show interest does not mean that you are obliged to the person.Then again, she put herself in that situation by intitiating the DTF convo and accepting the trip.
It doesn't seem as one dimensional as many want to make it seem.
What narrative? I admit I may have redacted my original post in a bad manner. I think explained it better on my post on this page. I just want to know how this situations are normally handled.
Then again, she put herself in that situation by intitiating the DTF convo and accepting the trip.
It doesn't seem as one dimensional as many want to make it seem.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/es/diccionario/ingles/consentThen again, she put herself in that situation by intitiating the DTF convo and accepting the trip.
It doesn't seem as one dimensional as many want to make it seem.
Hey xxracerxx let's fuck one month from now. Okay? But no changing your mind!Fuck off with this. Having a conversation where you show interest does not mean that you are obliged to the person.
She was victim of sexual harrassment, he feels he is a victim of fraud. I can see how they both feel violated.Do I really have to explain the concept of consent? Screw your victim blaming
You really gonna victim blame this shit? She had second thoughts, and he instead had a fucking tantrum.Then again, she put herself in that situation by intitiating the DTF convo and accepting the trip.
It doesn't seem as one dimensional as many want to make it seem.
Yea I really wish not every personal encounter has to be publicized like this
She was victim of sexual harrassment, he feels he is a victim of fraud. I can see how they both feel violated.
Are you seriously doing this? This is the hill you want to die on?She was victim of sexual harrassment, he feels he is a victim of fraud. I can see how they both feel violated.
She was victim of sexual harrassment, he feels he is a victim of fraud. I can see how they both feel violated.
I don't care if I get a warn for antagonizing, but you are an imbecile.She was victim of sexual harrassment, he feels he is a victim of fraud. I can see how they both feel violated.
Read his fucking twitter. He's openly admitting that he cancelled her return ticket specifically because she changed her mind on sleepping with him.
If "you don't get to return home unless you sleep with me" isn't sexual harrassment I don't know what is
She was victim of sexual harrassment, he feels he is a victim of fraud. I can see how they both feel violated.
Fraud?She was victim of sexual harrassment, he feels he is a victim of fraud. I can see how they both feel violated.
AP FACT CHECK: Resetera put the blame for the harrassment on cdgexe. But it takes two to tango. cdgexe's demand for sex is one reason for the harrassment. mari_mba's refusal of the trip is another.Then again, she put herself in that situation by intitiating the DTF convo and accepting the trip.
It doesn't seem as one dimensional as many want to make it seem.
Read his fucking twitter. He's openly admitting that he cancelled her return ticket specifically because she changed her mind on sleepping with him.
If "you don't get to return home unless you sleep with me" isn't sexual harrassment I don't know what is
Fuck off with this. Having a conversation where you show interest does not mean that you are obliged to the person.
She was victim of sexual harrassment, he feels he is a victim of fraud. I can see how they both feel violated.