Really though? Isn't the goal firing puns at each other to outgroan the "opponent"? :P
Guru Larry is "your man"? Hm.
As long as his content is fun and doesn't include his oppinions on troubled matters I don't care what he believes in.
Really though? Isn't the goal firing puns at each other to outgroan the "opponent"? :P
Guru Larry is "your man"? Hm.
The only reason I don't see it happening is if people think it's too derivative of the NC. Like, if you're going to re-brand, why make it almost a 1:1 replica? Why not change things?I don't know, he might be able to survive. You have to keep in mind that your examples are him trying new things and failing. If he were to do a show similar to the Nostalgia Critic without the name, I think he has enough of a fanbase that he'd be okay. That Guy With The Glasses successfully rebranded to Channel Awesome at the time, so I think "Nostalgia Critic" could rebrand too.
I think the best example of this is Phelan in To Boldly Flee, because half the time he's doing Doug's style and the other half he's in his default style of not giving a shit. And it's hilariously clear which is which.He even made them deliver their lines the same way he does. Like, he wanted them to emulate his speech patterns. How arrogant do you have to be to do that?
I think the best example of this is Phelan in To Boldly Flee, because half the time he's doing Doug's style and the other half he's in his default style of not giving a shit. And it's hilariously clear which is which.
Is that the one where he sarcastically and overdramatically taps the buttons? Or the one where he falls asleep?In one image in the background, he looks completely dead inside.
Was watching bits of MarzGurl's recent stream, and at one point she was talking about a harasser who wanted her and a few other women (like Lindsay and even Mara Wilson) to, um, burp for them or else.
Like, what.....
Is that the one where he sarcastically and overdramatically taps the buttons? Or the one where he falls asleep?
I think Fredrick Knudsen could do a good video all about this. His Down the Rabbit Hole series is pretty good, and avoids bias.
It'd be a long video too. A lot to dissect.
According to Linkara on various Rangerboard posts, Doug's idea of comedy is that all comedy comes from suffering, and has an unhealthy obsession with slapstick.
Others tried to argue with Doug about this but he won't budge on it. One user posted a South Park scene (the one in Season 3 where Korn transforms into corn), and Linkara noted how Doug would explain that as "confusion and shattered expectations, that's the suffering". Yeah I don't get it either.
Steven Universe vlogs. Fusion Cuisine.Doug actually had that in a video, though I can't remember which.
That's... not true at all. One of my favourite types of humour is absurdist humour, and most of the jokes I tell either witty remarks or aren't jokes so much as they are absurd non-sequiturs. I really don't know how Doug knows that not all humour derives from pain.No, I think it was a 'Critic' video. Like, he referenced Daffy Duck, I think? I've found a vid from 2015 - 'When Does a Joke Go Too Far?' where he says 'As mentioned by myself and others, all comedy is based on some form of misery', which suggests the source is something earlier still. He really does genuinely think comedy is inherently something sadistic.
Seems like the whole "Channel Awesome" bit went too farNo, I think it was a 'Critic' video. Like, he referenced Daffy Duck, I think? I've found a vid from 2015 - 'When Does a Joke Go Too Far?' where he says 'As mentioned by myself and others, all comedy is based on some form of misery', which suggests the source is something earlier still. He really does genuinely think comedy is inherently something sadistic.
Yeah, at this point, their "wait for all the information to come out, wait for another horrible CA reply" shit is irrelevant. They protected a rapist and praised his memory, knowing full well what he did, and they benefited financially from it. There is nothing anyone at CA can say to make themselves look better.I'm sorry, but Tamara and Malcolm have very plainly stepped over the line between collateral and participant, whatever their motivations.
He probably lives by the idea that Comedy=Tragedy+TimeThat's... not true at all. One of my favourite types of humour is absurdist humour, and most of the jokes I tell either witty remarks or aren't jokes so much as they are absurd non-sequiturs. I really don't know how Doug knows that not all humour derives from pain.
That's... not true at all. One of my favourite types of humour is absurdist humour, and most of the jokes I tell either witty remarks or aren't jokes so much as they are absurd non-sequiturs. I really don't know how Doug knows that not all humour derives from pain.
Honestly? I think he just doesn't understand that there's another underlying aspect to the type of humour he grew up with and enjoyed. I'm pretty sure he has actively cited Daffy Duck as an inspiration. So when trying to explain why Daffy getting hurt all the time is so funny, he concludes: "It's because he's in pain, which must be somehow inherently entertaining." rather than "Because something that causes pain is generally unexpected, thus subverting our expectations, and it is the subversion that proves entertaining."
I'm sorry, but Tamara and Malcolm have very plainly stepped over the line between collateral and participant, whatever their motivations.
I'm sorry, but Tamara and Malcolm have very plainly stepped over the line between collateral and participant, whatever their motivations.
I'm sorry, but Tamara and Malcolm have very plainly stepped over the line between collateral and participant, whatever their motivations.
And also; because with Daffy, there's an element of him deserving it for his haughtiness that makes it amusing, as is his tendency to cause his own suffering. Overall it's less the suffering itself, and more the way it happens to Daffy that makes it funny.
They weren't even consistent in payment. Some got paid in the blip days for videos hosted, others didn't (MarzGurl).They're done. They arrived after a lot of this shit went down and have no business commenting on it, much less acting like assholes about it.
And no, Tamara, this isn't "the most NORMAL thing ever." If the Chicago crew got paid for putting up other talents' vids then said talent should have been paid for the work they did and for driving traffic to the shitty CA website. Especially if, as we've already seen proven, they were turning profit based on other peoples' works. But, as I've said a lot now, these guys didn't have reps or lawyers and CA preyed on them as a result.
Or is this "you're getting paid for exposure" bullshit?
Which is why he writes all of his characters as assholes (even if it's out of character during crossovers), as he doesn't know any form of comedy that doesn't involve suffering, so the person has to deserve it (which is probably why I hated the Nostalgia Chick, as I only knew her from crossovers and he always wrote her as the most abrasive character in all the crossovers for some reason).And also; because with Daffy, there's an element of him deserving it for his haughtiness that makes it amusing, as is his tendency to cause his own suffering. Overall it's less the suffering itself, and more the way it happens to Daffy that makes it funny.
For some reasonWhich is why he writes all of his characters as assholes (even if it's out of character during crossovers), as he doesn't know any form of comedy that doesn't involve suffering, so the person has to deserve it (which is probably why I hated the Nostalgia Chick, as I only knew her from crossovers and he always wrote her as the most abrasive character in all the crossovers for some reason).
It certainly made the audience suffer.
I'm sorry, but Tamara and Malcolm have very plainly stepped over the line between collateral and participant, whatever their motivations.
To be fair, thats less Doug then normalThe 10th anniversary crossover is gonna star Doug, Rob, Doug, Malcom, Doug, Tamara, Doug, Michaud, Doug, Gaming Wildlife's absence, and Doug. I think that's everybody still on the site?
The 10th anniversary crossover is gonna star Doug, Rob, Doug, Malcom, Doug, Tamara, Doug, Michaud, Doug, Gaming Wildlife's absence, and Doug. I think that's everybody still on the site?
They're gonna try very hard to convince The Blockbuster Buster to make an appearance
There are times where I kind of want to know just where his sense of humor comes from, because a lot of what he seems to think is really funny just makes me cringe.
I'm sorry, but Tamara and Malcolm have very plainly stepped over the line between collateral and participant, whatever their motivations.
Doug firmly believes that comedy/humor requires misery. He brings this up a lot and that seems to be the extent of his understanding about humor. This actually explains a lot, doesn't it?
Alternate source: http://channelawesome.com/nostalgia-critic-when-does-a-joke-go-too-far/