If that is the source (lol), they should at least threadmark it
If that is the source (lol), they should at least threadmark it
ChatGPT and butthurt feelings.
if we can see the maths, we can at least judge for ourselves if it's up to scratch.
if we can see the maths, we can at least judge for ourselves if it's up to scratch.
Imagination, freedom and a full bottle of cachaça velho barreiro.
Using ChatGPT as a source is a new one. I thought there was some form of ban of AI on this forum.
I'm not sure anyone can string a coherent sentence together after a full bottle of Velho Barreiro, but that would indeed explain things.
Also the idea that one of the biggest retailers in a country would have just the one warehouse is nonsensical.I don't care that it's from ChatGPT, it's the math used which is nonsensical. You don't use square meter, a unit for area, to measure the volume.
Isso explica tudo.Imagination, freedom and a full bottle of cachaça velho barreiro.
how's the videogames market in Brazil compared for example with Mexico, another big LATAM country? is it huge?
whoever changed the title needs to show their work. Because they said 10 Eiffel towers judging by that new math it's wrong as well.
The thread title change alone is.....something.All I know is that this thread turned into 10 Eiffel towers worth of embarrassment with the "actually" and title update lol
No it's not.whoever changed the title needs to show their work. Because they said 10 Eiffel towers judging by that new math it's wrong as well.
No it's not.
330m x 10 / .43m(height of the PS5 box since most retail pallets are sold in stores up right and it has to be the box cause retailers don't typically sale unboxed items) = 7,647 even if you say depth wise that's still 330m x 10 / .18m = 18,333 or in other words a little over half the original title.
A stack of PS5s at a store will not be unboxed. It's noteworthy that there weren't as many complaints when it was 31k which would rely on the PS5's being unboxed.The original quote never mentions boxes, again, it mentions a stack of PS5s. It's all conjecture, and any of those numbers can be right or wrong. Trying to be authoritative without some actual, proper source is just dumb.
It's a PR quote from a retailer, it's not meant to be taken literally.
It's noteworthy that there weren't as many complaints when it was 31k which would rely on the PS5's being unboxed.
A stack of PS5s at a store will not be unboxed. It's noteworthy that there weren't as many complaints when it was 31k which would rely on the PS5's being unboxed.
He took this measurement to get 31K
That... isn't how stores stock boxes or consoles.
That's an Amazon warehouse.
See above. I'd love to see a store that stacks PS5 boxes (or any console) on their back.
It's also big cope energy to get the absolute maximum number possible. The PS5 box smallest measurement is 6.94in which is 18,800 maximum PS5's.
No one complained when the previous math was theoretical and based on large assumptions and very definitive. The thread title update has likely by the new number.
No one complained when the previous math was theoretical and based on large assumptions and very definitive. The thread title update has likely by the new number.
Should have just removed the number of units from the thread title
That's most threads tbh in these parts tbh.Everytime I read this thread I feel like I am drunk, as I have no awareness of what is going on and everyone is just talking gibberish :P
Everytime I read this thread I feel like I am drunk, as I have no awareness of what is going on and everyone is just talking gibberish :P
Wait until Chris Dring uses Big Ben to measure the consoles sold on Black Friday in UK.Lol I'm dying at this thread though, I have no idea what happened. I came in when the thread was made and found the unit of measurement hilarious. Check in today, I see chatgpt maths, stealth title updates. This is too much, even for era 😂
I mean the thread title literally comes from a post before Welfare's postNo one complained because no one was taking it serious (well, except Welfare). The new number is as likely as any other number. There's nothing noteworthy about that, unless you're implying something else.
Exactly.