I'm an American who thinks the infrastructure of this country is at best, completely pathetic. As for all of the "America is too big and massive"... no, just no.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REni8Oi1QJQ&t=576s
And for major state parks, you can always design transit options from the nearest population centers. Really big attractions like say Yellowstone could even get their own trains from the nearest transit centers, while consistent bus services could be designed for many major national parks. And of course at some point, you'll need a car like even the best designed transit places in the country. Good transit networks have never and never will be about serving every single possible place, just the ones that are convenient to do so between population centers and where there can be natural demand for them such as at the most popular state parks.
My derision of EVs is building so much of the conversation around a sustainable future on them. Car dependent infrastructure at the cost of all other infrastructure is the fundamental problem, not the existent of gas powered vehicles to access more remote places. The focus on EV infrastructure and the conversations around mileages ignore or even worse yet, supersede points about transit networks, high density development, walkable spaces, and the reality that most people don't actually do big road trips that often. EVs end up sucking all the air out of the room for the real solutions to the vast majority of America's problems, and that is Americans fell for car propaganda and rebuilt their cities around car dependent infrastructure and now have internalized that to the point that the US and the people living there will spend a fortune on inefficient, difficult to build, "clean" cars rather than address the problems on any level.
Which I mean, post-Covid, that's not surprising anymore, but always supremely disappointing.
I knew someone was going to specifically NOT read my post and post that video.
I specifically said we NEED trains cross country, it's entirely possible and really no reason not to do it, other than oil companies and southwest airlines lobbying against it.
What you failed to read and understand is, your not going to build public transportation for bespoke places 50/100/200 miles away from any major city that a high speed rail would connect to. So yea, cars will always be needed.
Take my big Bend example, it's a 5+ hour drive from El Paso and 7+ hour drive from San Antonio. Or some more cool places to visit in Texas, cause that's what I'm familiar with, Caddo Lake, a beautiful lake with bald cypress trees everywhere. Its 3+ hours from Dallas. But there are awesome state & national parks, small towns, and many other places to visit all over the country. It would be a logistical nightmare and waste of money building connecting trains to these places.
Sorry you don't like cars, but it's a fact of life of you want to do anything outside of a city irrespective of if that city has amazing public transport or not, you need a car.