If the story is actually about a white Muslim woman from Ethiopia, what's the issue here?
Click the headline image in the article.I couldn't find the clip on the tweet or the site it linked to.
That review is a tad ridiculous to be honest. I've seen well received Bollywood films be more guilty of stereotyping than the things described there (though that's not to say what's in there is not a stereotypical depiction of India).
This is based on a book written over ten years ago by an anthropology PHD who spent years doing research in Ethiopia. For any context that headline doesn't provide.
Damn that was worse then I thought
This is a profound novel, exploring themes of female circumcision, politics, war, tribalism, yet it is also an exquisite homage to Islam. Some of the most beautiful passages are about Lily's faith. Islam is her guiding force, as she seeks to discover the true meaning of jihad, "The holy war we have within ourselves ... Our internal struggle for purity."
Yall have to forgive us for not trusting anything hollywood does when it comes to this stuff we have ever right not to trust it with shit like The Greenbook winning oscars.
In Aloha, they took what was written to be a native Hawaiian character and cast Emma Stone, which required them to add a ridiculous line in the script about her being 1/4th Hawaiian (and we have to assume 3/4th Casper the Friendly Ghost) to compensate. For this movie, Dakota Fanning's character is actually supposed to be white.
This is based on a book written over ten years ago by an anthropology PHD who spent years doing research in Ethiopia. For any context that headline doesn't provide.
Yeah this is will always be my major issue.As always, the fact that it's an adaptation or based on a true story doesn't matter. The fact of the matter is, for every story of a white person in a foreign land / culture, there's a million stories of a person ethnically representative of that foreign land. But Hollywood is more likely to greenlight and create a movie about that white person in a foreign land / culture.
This.As always, the fact that it's an adaptation or based on a true story doesn't matter. The fact of the matter is, for every story of a white person in a foreign land / culture, there's a million stories of a person ethnically representative of that foreign land. But Hollywood is more likely to greenlight and create a movie about that white person in a foreign land / culture.
There's nothing problematic here except 1) a shitty headline intentionally written to try to stir up shit from people who won't actually read the article or do any sort of critical thinking and 2) said people, who like moths to a flame are simply unable to avoid turning out in drovesReally struggling to see what's inherently problematic about the concept. Especially given that it's based on a book written over 10 years ago by a PHD who spent a ton of time researching Ethiopia, and is directed by an Ethiopian.
Do I have to forgive you for not doing any actual research into it before automatically complaining about its existence? Because if you had, you would have seen the book it was based on, seen how well written and well received it was and also found out that Hollywood had nothing to do with the movies existence.Yall have to forgive us for not trusting anything hollywood does when it comes to this stuff we have ever right not to trust it with shit like The Greenbook winning oscars.
it's produced by a Canadian film company and being handled by international distributors. This is far away from a hollywood production.As always, the fact that it's an adaptation or based on a true story doesn't matter. The fact of the matter is, for every story of a white person in a foreign land / culture, there's a million stories of a person ethnically representative of that foreign land. But Hollywood is more likely to greenlight and create a movie about that white person in a foreign land / culture.
This isn't a "Hollywood Movie". It's a festival film.As always, the fact that it's an adaptation or based on a true story doesn't matter. The fact of the matter is, for every story of a white person in a foreign land / culture, there's a million stories of a person ethnically representative of that foreign land. But Hollywood is more likely to greenlight and create a movie about that white person in a foreign land / culture.
As always, the fact that it's an adaptation or based on a true story doesn't matter. The fact of the matter is, for every story of a white person in a foreign land / culture, there's a million stories of a person ethnically representative of that foreign land. But Hollywood is more likely to greenlight and create a movie about that white person in a foreign land / culture.
Yeah, noticed after posting, I glossed over the word Toronto there.
If you're talking about the headline of this topic, I agree. The Deadline headline is perfectly fine, but the "...wait" is the OP entirely trying to frame it to stir people up.There's nothing problematic here except 1) a shitty headline intentionally written to try to stir up shit from people who won't actually read the article or do any sort of critical thinking and 2) said people, who like moths to a flame are simply unable to avoid turning out in droves
As always, the fact that it's an adaptation or based on a true story doesn't matter. The fact of the matter is, for every story of a white person in a foreign land / culture, there's a million stories of a person ethnically representative of that foreign land. But Hollywood is more likely to greenlight and create a movie about that white person in a foreign land / culture.
Its a pretty easy mistake to make sense it happens so often but ti really does not change the points being made here its hard to ignored.Yeah, noticed after posting, I glossed over the word Toronto there.
I dunno, stacking "White Ethiopian Muslim In Refugee Drama" all into a single header is pretty much beggin for it.If you're talking about the headline of this topic, I agree. The Deadline headline is perfectly fine, but the "...wait" is the OP entirely trying to frame it to stir people up.
it's produced by a Canadian film company and being handled by international distributors. This is far away from a hollywood production.
Morocco, and there is really no shortage of white people in Morocco, maybe they should try to cast someone from there instead of once again trying to find out how they can cram american actors into stories to make them rElAtAbLe.If the story is actually about a white Muslim woman from Ethiopia, what's the issue here?
I mean, it's what the movie is about. Describing the movie isn't them attempting to stir shit up.I dunno, stacking "White Ethiopian Muslim In Refugee Drama" all into a single header is pretty much beggin for it.
I put the synopsis in the OP as soon as someone posted it ... it's right in the OPMaybe the book synopsis should be added to the OP? I was ready to groan and roll eyes before reading it upon entering the thread.
Lmao!!
Yea OP did it on purpose to get shit stirred and get folks riled. Shameful.If you're talking about the headline of this topic, I agree. The Deadline headline is perfectly fine, but the "...wait" is the OP entirely trying to frame it to stir people up.
Yup. Issue is less about Hollywood telling these stories, its the fact they ignore the thousands of other stories that don't feature white people as the focus (or re-write stories so white people who are vaguely involved become the focus).
I saw a Don Cheadle interview recently where he was talking about his Miles Davis passion project and how he had to write in the Ewan Mcgregor role for it to get green lit. You have one of the greatest musicians of all time and still hollywood feels that it needs a white face to sell it or white people won't buy tickets to see it, which has been dis proven time and time again
What exactly is the issue here?
There are many white muslims, and many white people in Africa. Perhaps it's unusual to those who are not familiar with that concept.
Yeah stuff like this always have some type of they must follow caveatYup. Issue is less about Hollywood telling these stories, its the fact they ignore the thousands of other stories that don't feature white people as the focus (or re-write stories so white people who are vaguely involved become the focus).
I saw a Don Cheadle interview recently where he was talking about his Miles Davis passion project and how he had to write in the Ewan Mcgregor role for it to get green lit. You have one of the greatest musicians of all time and still hollywood feels that it needs a white face to sell it or white people won't buy tickets to see it, which has been dis proven time and time again
I disagree. And what you're playing into is actually supporting Hollywood's recent trope of "X must direct X". I actually think the end goal for any director or writer is NOT to just tell stories about their culture. I have no idea what this particular director wants to do, but I wouldn't assume he is dying to tell a story about his people. He probably wants to make blockbuster films like everyone else.That's exactly the problem, and it doesn't matter if it's Hollywood, American Independent, or International Production companies. They all operate the same way.
It doesn't matter that it's an adaptation of a novel, or being directed by an Ethiopian director. I'm sure that Ethiopian director would love the opportunity to make a movie about Haile Selassie, but that movie is going to be passed over 999 times out of a 1000 for things like this and The Red Sea Diving Resort.
Now you can argue, quite strongly, that Hollywood doesn't adapt enough from non-western/white sources
Maybe this is explained in the book, but why Ethiopia? That country is mainly Christian and has been for ages.
It's just a bit odd that of all the Northern(ish) African countries to set your story about a white Muslim, you pick the one that has been Christian for most of its existence.