• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Cordy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
15,352
Damn, didn't expect the majority of this thread to be against Serena. Surprising. I say neither she nor Osaka deserved that today. Coulda been better for both women. Either way man, I'm outtie. See yall in another thread.
 

hitmon

Member
Oct 26, 2017
1,422
Naomi was playing solid and I think she would have won anyways. It's unfortunate her victory is marred by this controversy.
 

Morrigan

Spear of the Metal Church
Member
Oct 24, 2017
34,393
It's weird how so much of this thread seems to be ignoring the systematic obvious racism that Serena has faced throughout her entire career and how that might have an impact on her overall psychology that would result in a surprising "meltdown" when she feels she's being treated unfairly and called an immoral cheater.

Like people are seriously pretending her emotions might be coming out of thin air, what's going on, why would she feel like she's targeted in some way. Like I can't tell if people are sincerely on another planet or if they're being deliberately disingenuous for some reason.
A lot of the people in this thread don't know the first thing about tennis and are just using this thread as their own personal vehicle to denigrate Serena Williams. Wouldn't be the first time she's had nasty comments thrown at her on here.

They really don't care to genuinely discuss the incident that happened earlier or look at it from an unbiased perspective.
Or, you can acknowledge that all of the systematic racism etc. is real, and still think Serena behaved poorly during the match and needlessly escalated, you know? Both of these things can be true at once. I was rooting for Serena myself (as an "older" woman often facing younger upstarts in my own sport, I can relate xD) and I could sympathize with her thinking the first penalty was unfair. But when she smashed the racket and then started contesting that lost point, I just kinda cringed.

All that said, the crowd booing wasn't Serena's fault and that was really the worst part of it all IMO. Serena was classy during the ceremony, but the crowd just ruined the moment for Naomi and that sucks.
 
Oct 27, 2017
627
What does her being a black American have to do with anything here? Carlos Ramos isn't even American nor does he have a history of racism. As for the former points, it is clear that Serena saw her coach gesturing, and he even admitted to it and in the video you can see him nodding his head to acknowledge the fact she saw him. However, I don't even think she knew what he was motioning since he was so far away. At the end of day, the umpire saw the coach's motion and decided to penalize Serena. It is unfortunate though and I do think that the rule has to be changed so that the player isn't the one who gets penalized. The person providing the coaching should be warned/kicked out of the stands.

The black american speeding ticket scenario was an analogy, not a reference to Serena. Serena has had lots of questionable calls by umps throughout her career. Part of that is likely due to implicit bias. And an umpire doesn't have to have a history of racism or be american to exhibit such bias.

I agree. I'm not arguing that by the letter of the law, the call was incorrect. Coaching just seems to be something you can all the time if you look for it.

And players get penalized for it all the time. This one is on Serena

Again, agreed. I'm not saying the call was incorrect or that it wasn't her fault.

That was definitely not the time nor the place to bring that up!! I couldn't believe Serena would waste all that time and energy on something that will not happen on court. I have no idea where she was even going with that argument. She really got sidetracked and lost concentration which should not be happening in a slam final.

Probably not, but I can understand where she was coming from. I actually don't even think she lost concentration. I think she was just outplayed.

While I can't comment on other female players, I can say when Federer had his outburst in the 2009 US Open (same year as Serena's infamous one), he wasn't penalized but he was fined afterwards.

YESSS!!!!

I still consider it a meltdown due to the fact that Serena just couldn't stay focused and just let all the problems get to her. I feel like with the history she has had here and all the experiences in slam finals, she should have just worked through the problems like the champ she is.

Idk. A meltdown, to me, connotes being completely irrational, unreasonable and overwhelmed by emotion. She was upset but behaved fairly reasonable to me.
 
Oct 27, 2017
2,454
Damn, didn't expect the majority of this thread to be against Serena. Surprising. I say neither she nor Osaka deserved that today. Coulda been better for both women. Either way man, I'm outtie. See yall in another thread.

Why didn't Serena deserve that? She broke the rules. She then started being arrogant and breaking it again thinking she'd get away with it.

That incident in the match against Clijsters left Williams on a two-year probation period, leading to a $2,000 (£1,265) fine after she abused umpire Eva Asderaki in the 2011 final where she lost to Sam Stosur.

"If you ever see me down the hallway look the other way," she told Asderaki. "You're out of control. You're a hater and you're just unattractive inside."
 

hitmon

Member
Oct 26, 2017
1,422
If that's the case then why did Serena claim to the umpire that he stuck up his thumbs as encouragement instead of coaching her? Kinda odd if she didn't see him right.

Post match, they showed a video of her while the coach was doing the motion and it appeared she only saw the tail end of it with his thumbs up. She may have just seen the thumbs up.
 
Oct 27, 2017
627
If that's the case then why did Serena claim to the umpire that he stuck up his thumbs as encouragement instead of coaching her? Kinda odd if she didn't see him right.

He's taking his best guess given what happened. He didn't realize Serena saw him. But Serena thought he was just giving a thumbs up, which seems pretty reasonable given the motion he did.
 

Trojita

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,721
The only thing that is at odds is the "I don't cheat. I'd never cheat. I'd rather lose. I'm a mother" thing with the coach saying "Yeah I did it. Everyone does it" with a dash of It's not cheating if you don't get caught.

It's like someone copying someone's work during a test, getting caught, and then saying every in the class does it. By definition you were still cheating lol.

Now clearly it seems to be that Serena wasn't looking anywhere near him, so being shocked at the call with the general culture of coach signalling, it isn't surprising that Serena was a little irate.
 

Smiles

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,897
Wouldn't it be her mom that is loling the most at the misinterpretation?
well her mom is Japanese so would'nt that bow still seem a little weird to even to her? I doubt it would be lol worthy to her mom tho, the family lives in South Florida right now, even if she was born in Japan the bowing is excessive.
 

Falconbox

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
4,600
Buffalo, NY
Jesus, Serena got her say in, the chair umpire let her vent without penalizing her, and then SHE. JUST. KEPT. GOING.

Learn when to let it go. She even gave him the whole "you'll never work in this town again" kind of line.

https://streamable.com/fmcqi

 
Last edited:

Daitokuji

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,602
The coverup is always worse than the crime. Even if you incorrectly got called for coaching, just take the L and move on with the match.
 

Trojita

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,721
well her mom is Japanese so would'nt that bow still seem a little weird to even to her? I doubt it would be lol worthy to her mom tho, the family lives in South Florida right now, even if she was born in Japan the bowing is excessive.
As in the person whose culture is being followed in a weird way would probably have the most reaction. Like if someone was trying to emulate something poorly from french culture and a french person goes "lol wut is that".
 

JohnsonUT

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,032
I am curious to see if Djokovic actually gets called for coaching tomorrow. That guy is constantly communicating non-verbally with his box.
 

bionic77

Member
Oct 25, 2017
30,895
Nadal gets coached every point (common with a lot of other players too) and him and Djoker take way too much time on every serve (all of which are against the rules) and they both take some suspicious ass injury timeouts.

This umpire is a disgrace.

If you are going to call this stuff then be consistent. Don't make a point of starting during a US Open final.

The umpire should never be the story.

Hope this fuels an epic Serena revenge tour next year.
 

stupei

Member
Oct 26, 2017
2,801
Osaka wouldn't have been getting booed in the first place if Serena wasn't so petulant. She couldn't just take the L like a professional and whipped her stupid ass fans into a furore.

How is this even close to what happened? Osaka isn't the one who was being booed and once the win was actually decided, Serena treated the winner with respect. If she's somehow responsible for the behavior of the crowd, then wouldn't that behavior be positive?

It kind of just seems like you're determined to shit on her for every aspect of this. Say you dislike her behavior or think she took it poorly, okay, but she showed good sportsmanship toward the winner, which is what that word generally means unless we're suddenly expecting athletes to all like refs and umpires now. Going to be a really short list of acceptable displays of sportsmanship in that case.
 

Smiles

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,897
As in the person whose culture is being followed in a weird way would probably have the most reaction. Like if someone was trying to emulate something poorly from french culture and a french person goes "lol wut is that".
yeah you are right


Even the thread title here is annoying. It should be just "Naomi Osaka Claims US Open Title"...no need for any "After Serena Williams Meltdown"...it was quite theatrical but it ultimately didn't do anything but cost her a point and a single game. Naomi won the other 11 games by herself.

I totally agree with you and looking at how it is being reported in Japan https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20180909_10/
no special tidbits about drama and that is how it should be.

this will not be the last time we see Naomi winning a slam
 

Cup O' Tea?

Member
Nov 2, 2017
3,603
How is this even close to what happened? Osaka isn't the one who was being booed and once the win was actually decided, Serena treated the winner with respect. If she's somehow responsible for the behavior of the crowd, then wouldn't that behavior be positive?

It kind of just seems like you're determined to shit on her for every aspect of this. Say you dislike her behavior or think she took it poorly, okay, but she showed good sportsmanship toward the winner, which is what that word generally means unless we're suddenly expecting athletes to all like refs and umpires now. Going to be a really short list of acceptable displays of sportsmanship in that case.
How the hell is Osaka supposed to know who these people are booing anyway? If they are booing while she receives the trophy, I think she's going to assume it's directed at her. The fact she's literally in tears suggests she's not just waving it all off.

I don't think congratulating or hugging your opponent is enough to make up for the fact Serena's behaviour brought the whole event into disrepute leaving Osaka with an angry mob booing her in what should have been the moment of her life.
 

TickleMeElbow

Member
Oct 31, 2017
2,668
I was watching the Japanese broadcast, and they were praising Serena for consoling Naomi and telling people to stop booing.

Said it was good sportsmanship.
 

Grug

Member
Oct 26, 2017
4,645
Serena is a fucking legend, the GOAT. She also fucked up today. The two things aren't mutually exclusive.

It's really bizarre that people who are critical of her outburst are getting blanket accusations of being long term haters coming out of the woodwork. And the virtue signalling lying beneath these accusations is even more gross.

She is the ultimate, ferocious, uncompromising competitor. Those mental attributes which made her an absolute legend are naturally going to result in some ugly episodes as her star eventually wanes. We can be understanding of that while also calling a spade a spade. She fucked up, as people do. Don't need to pillory her for it, but let's not pretend she has been maliciously and unfairly targeted here either. Her actions during the presentation showed that she is still classy and kind hearted with genuine respect for the game and her opponents, but in the heat of the moment she dun goofed.

As an aside, I also fucking despise the logic that the rules should be applied differently or less stringently in a final. The fuck?
 

Pikachu

Traded his Bone Marrow for Pizza
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,402
Even the thread title here is annoying. It should be just "Naomi Osaka Claims US Open Title"...no need for any "After Serena Williams Meltdown"...it was quite theatrical but it ultimately didn't do anything but cost her a point and a single game. Naomi won the other 11 games by herself.

Eh, the meltdown was major news, like it or not. Osaka winning US Open would not have been thread worthy on its own. And to say it "just" cost her a game is disingenuous as the second set was much closer than first. One game could absolutely have gotten her the set.
 

leng jai

Member
Nov 2, 2017
15,119
Even the thread title here is annoying. It should be just "Naomi Osaka Claims US Open Title"...no need for any "After Serena Williams Meltdown"...it was quite theatrical but it ultimately didn't do anything but cost her a point and a single game. Naomi won the other 11 games by herself.

There is likely no thread without the Serena meltdown, ERA isn't that big on tennis.
 

Jarate

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,614
As an aside, I also fucking despise the logic that the rules should be applied differently or less stringently in a final. The fuck?
Sports are inherently an entertainment product. No one came to watch the refs. People came to watch the athletes play.

Especially in a finals match, people don't wanna see the refs get involved too heavily because it's boring. It happens in literally every sport for a reason.
 

Deleted member 20284

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 28, 2017
2,889
Sexist? Pfft how about fuck no. Plenty of male players get repeatedly pinged just the same, including escalation through tennis rules.

Disgusting booing at the ceremony too. Fuck that part of the crowd.
 

Pikachu

Traded his Bone Marrow for Pizza
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,402
Why do they even ban coaching in the first place? Seems pretty weird when so many other sports allow coaching during a game.

In women's tennis coaching is allowed but it requires you specifically ask for the coach and they come on court, etc. If you could just coach from the stands there would be no point for having that procedure.

I'm in favor of no coaching period. Once you get on the court it should be you alone. Men's tennis has this - coaches can't come to court for pep talks like in WTA.

I believe when you leave the court for medical issue then you are allowed to talk to coach, but I'm not 100% sure.
 

Cup O' Tea?

Member
Nov 2, 2017
3,603
Sports are inherently an entertainment product. No one came to watch the refs. People came to watch the athletes play.

Especially in a finals match, people don't wanna see the refs get involved too heavily because it's boring. It happens in literally every sport for a reason.
Fuck this bullshit. Having a completely different set of a rules for one particular game ruins the integrity of the sport.
 

Grug

Member
Oct 26, 2017
4,645
Sports are inherently an entertainment product. No one came to watch the refs. People came to watch the athletes play.

Especially in a finals match, people don't wanna see the refs get involved too heavily because it's boring. It happens in literally every sport for a reason.

Yeah I heard you the first time. I still think it's a junk argument based on a false premise and emotion and not reason.

Serena increased the referees involvement fivefold by blowing up.
 

stupei

Member
Oct 26, 2017
2,801
How the hell is Osaka supposed to know who these people are booing anyway? If they are booing while she receives the trophy, I think she's going to assume it's directed at her. The fact she's literally in tears suggests she's not just waving it all off.

I don't think congratulating or hugging your opponent is enough to make up for the fact Serena's behaviour brought the whole event into disrepute leaving Osaka with an angry mob booing her in what should have been the moment of her life.

I don't think Osaka deserves what happened here, to be clear. I just disagree with you in that I don't think Serena did either. Osaka deserved a chance to win without anyone questioning the validity of it -- which would have happened, to some degree, whether Serena reacted or not, because it is a pivotal call in a big moment -- and Serena didn't deserve to be placed under that kind of mental stress when she's already losing. Did she react badly? Sure. Do I feel like it's obviously understandable why given the treatment she has received over the course of her career and how hard she has worked to prove her ability is valid, especially why that would make her react really poorly to being called a cheater? Also yes.

She let her emotions get the best of her, but Osaka is also good enough to beat her without that. They should have had the chance to have that kind of ending and I don't feel like the two women need to be treated as though one must be entirely responsible for the circumstances in order to sympathize with the other. I think the circumstances were shitty for both of them.
 

Pikachu

Traded his Bone Marrow for Pizza
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,402
RE: enforcing the rules more or less strongly during a final - I'm of many minds. Umpires have always used the rules loosely, so I don't think it's ridiculous to ask them to continue to be loose during a final. Maybe that translates to giving a player a warning during a changeover for taking too long between points (and maybe even a second warning) before officially calling them out on it. Everyone knows Nadal takes three minutes between points, but he doesn't get the violation every single time.

Edit: As for this match, the only one that I think really should have slid was the coaching. The other two are indisputable IMO.
 

Wafflinson

Banned
Nov 17, 2017
2,084
User banned (3 days): hostile accusations and inflammatory generalizations towards other members
So many fake progressives in this thread sucking the cocks of other sexist people. Just because they enjoy seeing a powerful woman shot down.

This would never have happened to a man. Period.
 

Deleted member 8861

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
10,564
She's not wrong though.
I'm not claiming she's wrong that she has less leeway with the rules due to her gender.

However, that doesn't mean that she was in the right to be violating them. Those rules can be enforced at any time, no?

My own solution to that would be being more stringent on men as well.

So many fake progressives in this thread sucking the cocks of other sexist people. Just because they enjoy seeing a powerful woman shot down.

This would never have happened to a man. Period.

Since you're accusing everyone who doesn't support Williams of being sexist, let me ask you this: Why do you think people must be applauding a woman being torn down when she's fighting against another woman in the first place?

No man benefits or is seen as better or stronger because of someone thinking Williams was in the wrong here. The umpire is a no-name (compared to Williams), and the discussion is around Williams and not the umpire, so I don't see how saying she deserved punishment for breaking the rules remotely tears down a woman in a gendered way.

(I see how the call being made on a woman can be seen as sexist treatment, so I'll retract these couple bits.)

Also, I frankly find your implication that anyone who thinks she was possibly in the wrong here "enjoys seeing powerful women torn down" insulting.

Furthermore, as I stated above, you don't have to dismiss there being possibly sexist treatment here to find fault with Williams' behavior, either.
 
Last edited:

Allforce

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,136
if coachng is banned, why not make coaches sit in an enclosed space out of view of the players.

Because that makes too much sense, of course. Make the coach watch on TV in the locker room for god's sake and solve the issue for good.

Serena is undeniably the greatest but even the best have their worst days. She knows she should have dropped the argument in hindsight but in that moment I guess she the thought she could turn it around. It's tennis which has a history of players verbally abusing umpires (which is weird considering how stodgy the game can be), but you're always playing with fire by fucking with the official in charge.

Also LOL at someone trying to compare this to LeBron going nuts after dingbat JR Smith blew Game 1 of the finals. If your teammate fucks up that bad you have full green light to go absolutely nuclear.
 
Oct 25, 2017
2,405
So many fake progressives in this thread sucking the cocks of other sexist people. Just because they enjoy seeing a powerful woman shot down.

This would never have happened to a man. Period.
reading-winnie-the-poy9d8o.jpg
 

Ukraine

Banned
Jun 1, 2018
2,182
So many fake progressives in this thread sucking the cocks of other sexist people. Just because they enjoy seeing a powerful woman shot down.

This would never have happened to a man. Period.
I mean she was playing against a woman. And plenty of men received penalties for talking back in tennis. I'm really confused what kind of point Serena was trying to make when she brought gender into this discussion. And what's up with her mentioning that she is a mom? What does that have to do with rules of tennis?
 

Pikachu

Traded his Bone Marrow for Pizza
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,402
Her mistake was thinking that there was literally any chance in hell of the umpire retracting the violation. It seems like she honestly thought that after saying she would never cheat that he forgave her and took it away. That would never happen ever. Line calls that are factually proven wrong after the fact are not changed (outside of challenges, obviously).
 

Trojita

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,721
I think Naomi's been working all her life to take back the respect of the name Osaka in sports.

4JSpmZm.gif
 

stupei

Member
Oct 26, 2017
2,801
I mean she was playing against a woman. And plenty of men received penalties for talking back in tennis. I'm really confused what kind of point Serena was trying to make when she brought gender into this discussion. And what's up with her mentioning that she us a mom? What does that have to do with rules of tennis?

Why do people keep saying this like it counters what people obviously mean when they say that they think the call is sexist?

Nobody is saying it was done to make her, a woman, lose to a man. They are saying they do not believe the same call would have been made against a man of equal stature. Whether or not you disagree with that statement is something a person could argue, but saying that her opponent is another woman does not undermine or counter what people are very clearly saying and yet I keep seeing people point out that Osaka is a woman, over and over.

Yeah. We know.