If they want to sell N64 and GameCube games, then they should actually do it. There are currently none for sale on the eShop. Even for Wii, the original versions of games are nowhere to be seen, unless Skyward Sword HD is more emulated than they're letting on.
Yeah I think you're right. You just have to compare, for example, the games offered by Microsoft in Games with Gold and those offered with Game Pass. One is for playing online, another just for games.
Honestly? It just has to be fun and full of puzzles, exploration and adventure. I don't care if that's given in traditional dungeon format or not. BotW was the most fun, had the best puzzles, best sense of exploration and most full of adventure so I like it the most.
I love BOTW as I generally love open world games, and I thought the divine beasts and the shrines were good. But I think Ocarina of Time seemed to be the most balanced game and has some of my favorite dungeons, and cool overworld. Actually Link Between Worlds may be a bit better personally as I liked the overworld a lot with the many secrets, and the dungeons were so good. But for 3D Ocarina wins
I am just the opposite of you. My favorite part of Zelda is what's between the dungeons. The quests to access them, reach a town, explore the surroundings ...
I have a feeling that today reviews have been tougher than before.
Just GB/GBC/GBA + N64? I'd pay an extra 10 a year, bringing it to $30 US. If they put Gamecube games on there I'd pay like $60 a year easy.
I would recommend playing the first game first. If nothing else, the opening of the second game will spoil the ending of the first (which is a bit of a tearjerker tbh)
No??? This was a thing???
Like it or not, game reviews do not sit on a real 1-10 scale. 9 and 10 mean great to amazing, 8 means generally pretty enjoyable, and 7 means a bit iffy. 6 or lower? Waste of your time, get out of here. Obviously there will be differences for individual reviewers but the vast majority seem to follow this general guide.
Following on from the previous point, the difference between 75 and 80 is substantial once you acknowledge how inflated (and compressed) gaming scores are. 80 means most people liked it; a few loved it; a few were a little more mixed. 75 means a much more sizable chunk thought the game was mediocre or worse.
Nah, the difference between film reviews and game reviews is that people actually review bad movies. Hardly anyone reviews bad games. And it is normal. Because I can see a bad movie in two hours, playing a bad game can be five times that. Why any reviewer is going to waste their time?
I third your number two-ing of Derachi's movement
You should
with photoshop any dreams can come true
I think a combination of HD remasters and $40-60 collections that they can also sell at retail is probably the way they're going to handle selling those games going forward.
