It already happens in some states when women have """"suspicious"""" miscarriages.
It's probably the single most revolting thing about modern America. It's some literal dark ages shit.
Nope, she's just an ass in a seatNot really. More like a female version of Alito. She is not the writer that Scalia was and is unlikely to come close to being as influential as he was.
Several? She didn't go until the final weeks and not nearly enough as she should've. Plus she didn't go to Wisconsin at all.
Sorry but I'd rather blame her for running a terrible campaign than blame the people who didn't vote for her like some of the people in this thread are doing.
One thing I forgot to mention that really sucks is that some of those states will almost certainly try to hit those women with murder charges for getting abortions in other states. That's possibly the worst thing about this whole scenario.
The fact she felt comfortable blandly refusing to 'speculate' on states treating abortion as murder cases like spoke fucking volumesYeah she'll feed decisions to her husband and the rest of her cult to tell her how to vote . It's a part of the "People of Praise" shit.
Some of her past decisions before have been MONSTROUS.
He tends to be a little conservative. There's a 3% chance of a GOP trifecta in his forecast.
Setting limits is a constitutional amendment. That's just straight upnno feasible unfortunately.If Dems can take back Pres and both houses of Congress they need to go scorched earth and just go ham on stacking the deck in their favor so there can't be any kind of reversal in 2022 or 24. Pack the court, set 15-20 year term limits, set mandatory retirement at 70 if that comes first, any or all of these. Whatever it takes. And that goes for the lower courts too which are in an even more scary state than the SC. Get these fucks out or make them irrelevant. DC and PR statehood. Fuck the Reapportionment Act of '29 and expand the House a shit ton. Re-instate Voting Rights Act's Section 5 with updated section 4b. Do what they can to expand voter rights and access further to increase turnouts and soften the impact of the EC and other bullshit voter suppression stuff.
I can see this is a very divisive, and sensitive topic for a lot of folks. However, I think it is great to see another woman on the Supreme Court.
It's probably because today's the anniversary of this unfortunately wrong tweet and it made the rounds again this morning.Holy shit that woman is going to live rent-free in all their heads for the rest of their miserable lives.
I can see this is a very divisive, and sensitive topic for a lot of folks. However, I think it is great to see another woman on the Supreme Court.
So progressive of the republicans let me tell you!!I can see this is a very divisive, and sensitive topic for a lot of folks. However, I think it is great to see another woman on the Supreme Court.
Not this woman.I can see this is a very divisive, and sensitive topic for a lot of folks. However, I think it is great to see another woman on the Supreme Court.
Sometimes it is best not to hit POST REPLYI can see this is a very divisive, and sensitive topic for a lot of folks. However, I think it is great to see another woman on the Supreme Court.
Nah, I fucking hate the 40% of citizens who backed this clown.I was going to write up a long encouraging post but I think i got a good short one...
No amount of hate, restriction or tyranny will ever be able to remove the love we have for our fellow citizens in our hearts. No person or court will ever be able to change that. Sure they can make life a lot harder for us, but we can make that hard for them. And we can help make life easier for each other. There is no defeat here, they've only gained a new piece on the board.
We did....
MORE 👏 WOMEN 👏 COPSI can see this is a very divisive, and sensitive topic for a lot of folks. However, I think it is great to see another woman on the Supreme Court.
Not necessarily. There are proposals to make Justices "Senior Justices" that then go on to serve lower courts or can be called up if a vacancy suddenly occurs, but are otherwise no longer a part of the main court body that do not conflict with the Constitution and thus don't require an Amendment.Setting limits is a constitutional amendment. That's just straight upnno feasible unfortunately.
No. Just no.I can see this is a very divisive, and sensitive topic for a lot of folks. However, I think it is great to see another woman on the Supreme Court.
what an inspiration it will be to women everywhere when she rules in favor to remove rights from themI can see this is a very divisive, and sensitive topic for a lot of folks. However, I think it is great to see another woman on the Supreme Court.
GFY. Seriously.I can see this is a very divisive, and sensitive topic for a lot of folks. However, I think it is great to see another woman on the Supreme Court.
I can see this is a very divisive, and sensitive topic for a lot of folks. However, I think it is great to see another woman on the Supreme Court.
I can see this is a very divisive, and sensitive topic for a lot of folks. However, I think it is great to see another woman on the Supreme Court.
No worries, I'm not saying you've gotta love anyone you dont want to. Love who you still have and keep them all safe. Like me! Love me! :DNah, I fucking hate the 40% of citizens who backed this clown.
You couldn't be a more obvious troll if you were under a bridge. Just stop.I can see this is a very divisive, and sensitive topic for a lot of folks. However, I think it is great to see another woman on the Supreme Court.
Collins in a doomed move to save her concerned ass
The only thing that seems to be on the GOP's agenda nowadays is fill in judges and own the libs.
Come on.I can see this is a very divisive, and sensitive topic for a lot of folks. However, I think it is great to see another woman on the Supreme Court.
Tell me moreI can see this is a very divisive, and sensitive topic for a lot of folks. However, I think it is great to see another woman on the Supreme Court.