The UK planning stuff is very pie-in-the-sky. I don't think there's much joined-up-thinking between different branches of government and the emergency services.
We're apparently planning for 80% infection, 6 million (about 10%) concurrent infections and a 20% reduction in workforce for the emergency services.
The police will be fine but we may restrict our response to minor crimes!
Maybe someone should tell the NHS this, because they absolutely can't cope with that sort of event.
We have 100K hospital beds, which are a bit over 90% full. Most of those are just regular wards and are not equipped with serious medical equipment (ventilators, etc.) That means we can treat 0.15% of the population and have free space for 0.015%.
About 20% of the infected go to hospital (severe cases) and 5% (critical cases) will die without serious medical intervention.
At 6 million infected, we would need hospital beds for 0.3-1.2 million people, which is way beyond what we could provide.
I think governments need to be realistic. You cannot allow 80% of the population to become infected or 10% to be infected at the same time.
All efforts should focus on keeping the effective transmission ratio below 1 with non-medical hygeine measures.
The good news is that these doomsday predictions are unrealistic. You don't get exponential spread to 10% of the total population. Controlling the spread and lowering the daily infection rate is possible. China have done it and S.Korea are doing it.
Interestingly the
latest SK figures show a LOT of infection in 20-29 year olds (about 30% of positive cases and much higher than any other 10-year age range), but zero deaths out of 1500 cases. There's no breakdown on hospital admissions, unfortunately, so I don't know how sick they got. Anyway, for the ERA demographic, if you get sick stay at home and don't visit your grandparents.
SK has a little over 5000 cases and has growth is levelling off. This epidemic can be controlled.