Military has different stance on this than Trump
The military doesn't really have a stance, they are just stating essentially claiming a "fact"
Military has different stance on this than Trump
Iran's Revelutionary Gaurd's QUD forces are specifically tasked with extraterritorial unconventional warfare (basically terrorism, spying, and supporting terrorist and extremist revolutionary groups outside of Iran). Obviously, we're much worse internationally in a number of ways, but they're still a very powerful and destablizing influence.
By all accounts Iran was in compliance with the agreement and then Trump ripped it up. I think there are zero good faith arguments for doing what he did there.
Was the agreement perfect? That's the wrong question to ask because perfection isn't really the goal or achievable in diplomacy, or really any aspects of life. It was better than nothing, Iran was cooperating and it could've led to a better agreement by both sides showing good faith and keeping their word. Now all bets are off once again
I'm not sure how you'd just "pancake" a country with an aerial campaign using conventional weapons. I'm not sure how you have boots on the ground without the potential for tremendous casualties. It seems like Iran is far more capable than Iraq was and look how that turned out? It's one thing to roll into Tehran and topple the government in a week or something like that, but the ensuing power vacuum and I'm assuming occupation would be a nightmare
I mean, when you post shit like this it's all to blatant what your angle is.
The context of Iran's actions is the US has caused a situation where they have little options remaining in order to remedy and force cooperation for sanction relief.
Your posts are commenting on Iran's aggression without talking about the underlining root cause.
Iran knows that a war with the US would lead to it's utter destruction, yet it's continuing to take actions that would escalate the current situation to where that risk increases. Iran isn't an irrational actor, if they are committing these actions which are inherently aggressive it's because they likely view the current path they are on of inaction unpalatable due to it's likely outcome of the nations collapse or government collapse.
If inaction is no longer tenable and the current actions risk a wider conflict, what does that say about how Iran views it's current situation?
Oh piss off. Iran isn't the one busy invading and destroying Iraq and Afghanistan and Libya and Pakistan and Yemen.
Yeah, you may want to recheck your sources on Yemen, my dude.Oh piss off. Iran isn't the one busy invading and destroying Iraq and Afghanistan and Libya and Pakistan and Yemen.
I think some explanation is needed. On its surface, this reads as completely nonsensical lol.
Oh piss off. Iran isn't the one busy invading and destroying Iraq and Afghanistan and Libya and Pakistan and Yemen.
We've been conducting military operations in Yemen since 9/11, backed and provided some logistical aid to Saudi Arabia's invasion from '15, and have had commandos fighting on the ground since at least last year. Plus we've recently sold them ridiculous amounts of weapons and tech.
Sure and Iran's been pretty actively involved since 2015 as well.We've been conducting military operations in Yemen since 9/11, backed and provided some logistical aid to Saudi Arabia's invasion from '15, and have had commandos fighting on the ground since at least last year. Plus we've recently sold them ridiculous amounts of weapons and tech.
I'm no Iran Stan, but this happened yesterday, and a video that cheesy can be cobbled together in five minutes.Being Iran has a video ready to go shows it was premeditated to attack this drone. Also showing wreckage means nothing as they could've just picked it up if it was in international waters.
You don't set up a camera in the middle of the night unless you're expecting to do something....I'm no Iran Stan, but this happened yesterday, and a video that cheesy can be cobbled together in five minutes.
I suppose I'm fairly indifferent on this.
I'm not against the US sending unmanned reconnaissance drones over Iran's potential nuclear facilities and I'm not really upset that a sovereign state shoots an unmanned drone down within their own airspace.
How do you get war from that?So...it's war then? Or at least another link in the chain towards war...
A measured response is one where thought and time is put into it. A response doesn't mean a military strike.A measured response? With Pompeo and Bolton whispering sweet nothings in Trump's ear? Don't make me laugh.
You don't set up a camera in the middle of the night unless you're expecting to do something....
I think in the sense that US stop selling oil to japan, thus "forcing" japan to attack the US in order to secure oil for their war in China? Maybe? That's how I interpret it.I think some explanation is needed. On its surface, this reads as completely nonsensical lol.
A measured response is one where thought and time is put into it. A response doesn't mean a military strike.
A measured response could be anything or absolutely nothing. My guess would be something non-military, but time will tell.And what kind of response would we be looking at? More sanctions? More Troops? Anything of those will only make the situation more dangerous and just further raises the risk of war. Trump may not want war but those idiots do and anything they can trick him into doing will only further their agenda of backing Iran into a corner until its hand is forced, like it was last night.
Pretty sure that's just a handheld camera or phone based on how they point it up at the sky?You don't set up a camera in the middle of the night unless you're expecting to do something....
I feel like war with Iran can't be sold to the American public, even to the hardcore conservatives that make up about 20-30 percent of our populace.
If trump can lock up little children iam sure he can sell a war in iran. ,, iran attacked us, NOBODY attacks america and gets away with it". SoldI feel like war with Iran can't be sold to the American public, even to the hardcore conservatives that make up about 20-30 percent of our populace.
I think it means "I don't know what the fuck Trump will be convinced to do. He's a lazy idiot who doesn't read, and has the attention span of a goldfish."So...it's war then? Or at least another link in the chain towards war...
If trump can lock up little children iam sure he can sell a war in iran. ,, iran attacked us, NOBODY attacks america and gets away with it". Sold
Japan was embargoed by the US (and allies) and had no oil. Backed into a corner and desperateI think some explanation is needed. On its surface, this reads as completely nonsensical lol.
Iam not sure trump wants a war but everybody around him seems like they cant wait.But it was an unmanned aircraft lol
Idk
If anything the retaliation will just be cia type ops, maybe riling up iranians for their own type of "Arab spring"
See, if this was bush right now then I'd be more scared, but Trump is more of an authoritarian type leader, and if he isn't the one to have the idea, then I don't think he'll do anything.Iam not sure trump wants a war but everybody around him seems like they cant wait.
Doesnt matter if its a drone. Its an attack. I really hope nothing happens but i dont trust the people in the white house .
If Trump truly doesn't want war with Iran and is actively trying to de-escalate the situation then, credit where credit is due.