• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

VegiHam

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,619
Mega evos robbed us of new pokemon in gen six and I've held a grudge ever since, but this is daft.

(Yes I know megas are new pokemon but they don't get new pokedex numbers and I can't add them to my living dex so as a catch em all single player kinda guy they aren't thee same thing.)
 

Mashy

Member
Oct 28, 2017
1,184
Mega's were a cool mechanic. Dynamaxing is just plain trash and lazy in comparison.
 

Benzychenz

One Winged Slayer
Member
Nov 1, 2017
15,411
Australia
Lmao at everyone here going

"Good because muh balance"

They can just ban them from competitive like many legendaries have been for ages.

Just say you're glad we're getting less content because you don't like some designs or the option to have them.

Less options are good if it's stuff I don't like!

This is the let's go defense all over again.
What if I don't care about competitive play?

I hate megas because of what their inclusion means. Pokemon like Pinsir and Mawile were made to never be able to receive a proper new evolution, as well as the stupid favouritism of Charizard getting two forms and Venusaur/Blastoise only getting one.

Let's just keep the megas in the 3DS generation games and quietly move on and pretend they never happened.
 

Deleted member 34949

Account closed at user request
Banned
Nov 30, 2017
19,101
Pidgeot at least being semi viable was nice while it lasted.

Back to being a neat design and shit tier in every other aspect, I guess.
 

XaviConcept

Art Director for Videogames
Verified
Oct 25, 2017
4,982
yeah great, less content.
fair weather explains a lot of this type of mentality
More content doesnt equal better, design by substraction can be much more powerful than just adding everything from previous games.

And yes, I would argue its important for Pokemon games to remain accessible to everyone. Its the first main gameon a home console so it needs to be a jumping point for a lot of players.
 

brinstar

User requested ban
Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,349
More content doesnt equal better, design by substraction can be much more powerful than just adding everything from previous games.

And yes, I would argue its important for Pokemon games to remain accessible to everyone. Its the first main gameon a home console so it needs to be a jumping point for a lot of players.
Let's Go already was that. And Mega Pokemon had basically become bonus postgame content for people who wanted them in the last games. They wouldn't get in the way of new players.
 

XaviConcept

Art Director for Videogames
Verified
Oct 25, 2017
4,982
Let's Go already was that. And Mega Pokemon had basically become bonus postgame content for people who wanted them in the last games. They wouldn't get in the way of new players.
Depends, no content is free. Has to be designed, produced, implemented, tested ... all that gets in the way of making new stuff for a new game.

Lets Go was for Pokemon Go players, S&S is for people who dont like portable gaming and are curious about what a console game will be like. Focus on the new stuff and make that compelling instead of forcing legacy stuff in, thats generally a good idea.
 

Serebii

Serebii.net Webmaster
Verified
Oct 24, 2017
13,164
It's possible that they can and will be readded in future titles or via patch. They're not gone forever.

Besides, they said this in Treehouse and that's where Famitsu got it from, not from the interview itself.
 

Fj0823

Legendary Duelist
Member
Oct 25, 2017
26,702
Costa Rica
What if I don't care about competitive play?

I hate megas because of what their inclusion means. Pokemon like Pinsir and Mawile were made to never be able to receive a proper new evolution, as well as the stupid favouritism of Charizard getting two forms and Venusaur/Blastoise only getting one.

Let's just keep the megas in the 3DS generation games and quietly move on and pretend they never happened.

I hate content because it's not the content I wanted for my favorite! Take it all away!

What is this bullshit?

Also, we don't even know if the game even has Pinsir or Mawile. At all.

Let's just quietly leave them in the 3DS era, and pretend they never happened shall we?
 

Bard

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
12,582
Hated megas and was indifferent to zmoves so I don't see this as a negative.
 

Zellia

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,769
UK
Megas actually involved Pokemon getting cool redesigns and, while they made missteps, it gave some underappreciated Pokemon a day in the limelight.

I can see why they don't want that overshadowing 'uh it's a Pokemon but it's big'
 

Benzychenz

One Winged Slayer
Member
Nov 1, 2017
15,411
Australia
I hate content because it's not the content I wanted for my favorite! Take it all away!

What is this bullshit?

Also, we don't even know if the game even has Pinsir or Mawile. At all.

Let's just quietly leave them in the 3DS era, and pretend they never happened shall we?
Bullshit?

It's called an opinion.

You like megas. I don't. That's fine. Cut the aggression.
 

Rand a. Thor

Banned
Oct 31, 2017
10,213
Greece
So basically fuck consistency, we'll just keep adding new battle gimmicks with Kanto exclusive forms and power ups, only to abandon them one gen later. Yep, Gamefreak has lost it for me. Sword and Shield is looking yo be a great addition to the series as a region and new pokemon go, but holy fuck are the devs going on a war path of bad decisions.
 

Valkerion

Member
Oct 29, 2017
7,277
I really liked Megas, Z moves were just overly long animations to one shot something though. Also not that surprised. Pokemon regularly has a crisis when it comes to keeping old mechanics.

Actually, I'm pretty surprised to see Megas go. It became clear they were not going to expand on the idea but some of those forms became very popular.
 
Oct 25, 2017
2,947
RIP

SphericalCircularBlacklab-size_restricted.gif
 

AlexFlame116

Prophet of Truth - One Winged Slayer
Member
Nov 17, 2017
23,187
Utah
Y'all make me mad.

RIP Mega Evolution. I loved seeing some Pokemon achieve a new form past the one they had. And it should have just stayed as a fourth evolution.
Depends, no content is free. Has to be designed, produced, implemented, tested ... all that gets in the way of making new stuff for a new game.

Lets Go was for Pokemon Go players, S&S is for people who dont like portable gaming and are curious about what a console game will be like. Focus on the new stuff and make that compelling instead of forcing legacy stuff in, thats generally a good idea.
Oh this makes me so mad. Sounds exactly what Game Freak is saying in regards to cutting out groups of Pokemon from being transferred from Home to Sw/Sh and using Dynamax as a reasoning along with animations.
 

Normal

Member
Oct 26, 2017
6,296
Getting rid of Mega's is so dumb. It finally give Pokemon like Charizard,Beedrill, Mawile, etc a chance to be useful. RIP Beedrill, back to PU you go along with Charizard.
 

AnansiThePersona

Started a revolution but the mic was unplugged
Member
Oct 27, 2017
15,682
This is such fucking trash because it means I'll never see Mega Ampharos ever again. Goodnight, my sweet, L'Oreal prince
 

Death Penalty

Avenger
Oct 27, 2017
3,318
Wow, RIP mega evolution, I really liked that mechanic and how it revitalized lots of Pokemon. Dynamaxing really just seems like a stupider version of it.
 

Pokemaniac

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,944
The battle gimmicks are really getting out of hand. Especially with Dynamax seemingly purposefully designed to never appear again. They really need to break out of this mentality they have where they feel the need to introduce a new one every generation.
 

AnansiThePersona

Started a revolution but the mic was unplugged
Member
Oct 27, 2017
15,682
I hate content because it's not the content I wanted for my favorite! Take it all away!

What is this bullshit?

Also, we don't even know if the game even has Pinsir or Mawile. At all.

Let's just quietly leave them in the 3DS era, and pretend they never happened shall we?
Yeah I am pretty confident Pinsir an Mawile aren't in that PokeDex lol
 

Deleted member 6230

User-requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,118
Removing megas is fucking BOLD but I can't say I hate it. Definitely not going to miss Z moves. To be honest this is something they had to do for competitive play at least. Imagine having to worry about a mega, a z-move, and now dynamaxing all in the same match. Yeesh.
 

Darknight34

Banned
Apr 29, 2018
210
This 1-2 punch of absent pokemon and removing these..goodness..pull a sonic and delay it because my excitement is in the trash.
 

Pokemaniac

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,944
While I can mostly understand removing Z-moves, taking out megas is pretty dumb and emblematic of the issues with Sword and Shield in general. They're basically a full form change, so they should be kept around just like all the Pokémon should be kept around.

Seriously though, the really need to pick a gimmick and stick with it and build upon it.
 

Kaseoki

Unshakable Resolve
Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,291
Kill these generational gimmicks and just give us the goddamn national dex!
 

Corrie1960

Banned
Mar 19, 2019
1,888
Jesus game freak your slowly becoming the absolute worst

Only half the Pokémon and your butchering mega's and z moves

I know your hard up for time because you can to sync up the release with the next anime, card game, movie and more but still

So what happens in Gen 9 no gigamaxing it's gone for the next game.

Hire more staff
 

Benzychenz

One Winged Slayer
Member
Nov 1, 2017
15,411
Australia
You're defending cut content on a game that might not even have the Pokemon you so want "real evolutions for"

It's bullshit.
I mean, that's fine if those Pokemon aren't in this game. If they actually commit to removing megas for all future generations then yeah maybe Pinsir will get an actual evolution in gen 9 or 10 or whatever, and I'll see this as the best way to go. Megas were a mistake that should be rectified.
 

Nali

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,675
There's some neat designs among the megas, but they never sat right with me as a way to make unloved pokemon more appealing, since it focused all the attention on a handful of lucky winners and left hundreds of others in the dust. Never mind that a good chunk of the megas were for species that were already popular and useful and didn't need the help, so the design intent of it was muddled from the beginning.

Still kinda surprised they're gone, though. Seemed too marketable to die.
 

ToddBonzalez

The Pyramids? That's nothing compared to RDR2
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
15,530
Game Freak's gimmicky battle mechanics that are basically tossed out after 1 gen are definitely one of the most frustrating parts of recent Pokémon games.

And for the record- Mega Evolution was pretty cool. Z-moves were meh. Dynamaxing seems lame, but I'll withhold final judgment until I play it.
 

Titik

Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,490
I loved some of the designs for Megas too but I'm glad they removed it.

Either you keep adding to it or don't even bother adding it in the first place.
 

Deleted member 8593

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
27,176
Between this and the national dex fiasco there's a hollow satisfaction in knowing that Game Freak's shortsightedness is finally coming back to bite them in the ass. I was never a huge fan of Megas and even less so of Z-Moves so their exclusion doesn't bother me that much personally but it's become a really dumb practice of theirs over the years to throw in stuff just to remove it again. There was a subset of the fanbase that kept defending it and now it's finally affected the one thing the hardcore holds dear - the Pokémon roster.
 

riq

Member
Feb 21, 2019
1,690
So when Game Freak said they considered Megas new Pokemon they weren't kidding huh?